fliball123 wrote: » I replied to Props with this link that shows his figures are completely inaccurate with regard to houses coming on stream of course when you prove him wrong he simply ignores the post..Here it is again for you propshttps://www.housing.eolasmagazine.ie/the-challenge-of-housing-obsolescence/#:~:text=According%20to%20Sirr's%20figures%2C%20a,19%2C000%20is%20due%20to%20obsolescence.
Timing belt wrote: » So you claim obsolescence is inflating the demand figure by 5,000 despite the fact that this is a calculated figure from census data: 2016 housing stock - 2011 housing stock - new builds = obsolesce Also the ESRI do make reference to it and have a full section devoted to why you need to included obsolescence in calculating demand. -see section 5.3 OBSOLESCENCE on page 33 of REGIONAL DEMOGRAPHICS AND STRUCTURAL HOUSING DEMAND AT A COUNTY LEVEL Report published Dec 2020 The ESB reconnections you mention are only 2.5k a year and are mainly due to repossessed properties re-entering the market. yes this add's supply but if you are going to count this you need to reduce supply for properties repossessed. so the overall impact on housing supply is minimal.
PropQueries wrote: » I assume you're talking about pensioners, carers, sick people and the children's allowance for middle income workers etc. Link here to the breakdown of the €20 billion social welfare budget for 2019: https://whereyourmoneygoes.gov.ie/en/socialprotection/2019/
PropQueries wrote: » This is the post I assume you're referring to and I don't see anything wrong with the assumptions
schmittel wrote: » I think we're already seeing asset/commodity price inflation.CPI in the Uk creeping up - I do think we might also have quite a serious problem with CPI inflation looming. Central Banks seem to be trying to tick it up a bit, but if it gathers momentum they'll find it hard to get the genie back in the bottle, and they may end up caught between a rock and a hard place.
fliball123 wrote: » Its all broken politicians not doing what they promise Renters not paying their rent Mortgage holders not paying their mortgage Unions holding too much powerPeople on welfare expecting to have more than those working.. The whole system is broke
MacronvFrugals wrote: » This thread is proof - Fianna Fail broke the economy Fine Gael broke society
PropQueries wrote: » Was referring to the average number of potential occupants per new built unit. But I’d also add in the c. 5,000 (or whatever the figure is, maybe half that?) additional dwellings that are reconnected to the ESB each year (reconnections are only counted if they haven’t been connected in the past 2 years) so are very real additional supply into the market annually. I’d also add in the probate sales at a minimum of c. 5,000 - 10,000 per annum. Contrary to some people’s opinions here, when old people pass away, we don’t send in the demolition contractors and immediately knock down their home so it’s very real additional supply each year. So, new supply entering the market each year is definitely exceeding demand IMO. And I think many people don’t realise that those housing demand projection figures put out by the central bank, ESRI etc. include having to replace c. 5,000 units that they believe become obsolete and vanish into space each and every year in Ireland. I doubt that level of obsolescence (if true) is happening in Dublin, Galway, limerick and Cork each year (where people actually want to live) so the estimates for future housing demand projections are way off IMO, especially as their projections are also based on net inward migration staying at c. 30,000 per annum out to 2030.
PropQueries wrote: » If I remember correctly, just after the last bust, many suppliers to the councils, state etc. found it very difficult to get paid for services provided. So not only do big companies engage in these tactics, so does the state. The banks were the same with the tracker mortgage scandal when they were broke etc. etc. Landlords in Ireland actually get very lucky given how the vast vast majority of tenants continue to pay their rent even through bad times.
Idbatterim wrote: » I agree, its carnage for those on the housing ladder or its carnage for those not on it. I ultimately think, that if it takes carnage, to sort out this moral disgrace once and for all, it is a no brainer! absolute no brainer!
Cyrus wrote: » who are the elite? and id wager the % of arrears on social properties is higher than that on 'elite' mortgages.
beauf wrote: » The commoditization of housing over recent decades is a problem for most economies. Profits need to be capped but not removed, housing has to be made cheaper, simpler and faster to build. Rather then encouraging economic migration, wealth should be shared globally investing in other poorer
Sweet.Science wrote: » The vulnerable dont have to pay rent The elite dont have to pay their mortgage
Idbatterim wrote: » good points. SF ironically of the larger parties, have oppossed the most amount of new developments. I mean it seems to do no harm at local level, win the nimby votes , then at national level, people dont even see the double standard and vote SF in their droves, based on the housing crisis! it is unbelievable! I mean FFG are a joke. SF are hypocrites and will likely be a joke, but might be the change that is needed, for the **** to all come crashing down the disgraceful system or that happens and FFG can no longer ignore, that they are in effect , totally responsible, if that happens. SF didnt drive the change and voters to themselves, FFG have done it! I agree, its carnage for those on the housing ladder or its carnage for those not on it. I ultimately think, that if it takes carnage, to sort out this moral disgrace once and for all, it is a no brainer! absolute no brainer! Sure isnt your home, your home? price only matters if going to sell! There is way , way too much bull**** spouted about rising property prices etc, people here are conditioned to think in one way, homeowners. But the reality is, rip off property, is actually very bad, for the vast vast majority of society...
schmittel wrote: » Sinn Fein are the giant elephant in the room. The current FF/FG coalition have shown that they are going to continue with the policies that increase prices, presumably because their voter base are property owners/investors/developers. The only way this ends is with SF winning most seats in an election, which is likely to be the next general election. Consider who SF are likely to be able to for a coalition with? PBP and their ilk will be in government influencing policy. SF will be elected on affordability, not supply. It's not going to cut it to say we cannot do anything different to the last lot, you just have to wait a few years while we build 150k houses. SO what are SF/PBP etc likely to do? They'll pursue policies that crash the market from the top down. If you've just bought a 3 bed semi d in Goatstown you might not think it represents the top end of the market, but if you paid 750k for it has a lot of room to drop in SF/PBP eyes. They are likely to be in government in four years time. If this coincides with unavoidable interest rate rises it could be carnage.
If you've just bought a 3 bed semi d in Goatstown you might not think it represents the top end of the market, but if you paid 750k for it has a lot of room to drop in SF/PBP eyes. They are likely to be in government in four years time. If this coincides with unavoidable interest rate rises it could be carnage.
Idbatterim wrote: » oh I totally agree, there has been change. I mean serious change though. SF winning most seats, potential economic carnage, due to them or FFG current ridiculous economic mismanagement. If this pup payment has to be paid out for many months after the expected current march deadline... the insane housing policies. Zero appetite to change course on policies and practices they know are insane and indefensible... Maybe we do need another economic bust, they have learned NOTHING!
Sweet.Science wrote: » But is there risk at the moment for builders at the low end . Councils seem to have to appetite to purchase these en masse at the moment . Especially outside of Dublin
beauf wrote: » There already are. People couldn't get a place to rent if they were in any support payments. So the law was changed. High risk tenants couldn't find any places to rent, the law was changed. Etc. Some of these rules banning evictions etc, are to protect tenants, but they are also to stop LL from leaving the market. Banks aren't willing to risk lending to builders, builders are willing to build property with margin profit, or risk. Especially at the low end. End result shortage of supply at the low end especially. Covid makes this worse, some getting poorer some getting richer. They will build to the market that can pay them.
TheSheriff wrote: » I remember this comment being made multiple times now on this thread, probably two years back. I don't feel sorry or sympathetic for those people who bought: I feel sympathetic for those caught in never ending rent, which is likely to continue.
Idbatterim wrote: » .... I really foresee massive issues here coming down the line, they just take ridiculously long to manifest! way longer than you would expect...
beauf wrote: » Guess LL should do the same regarding any of their costs, also. Stop paying for RTB, all other taxes, mortgage if they have one, repairs etc. Everyone just stop paying for everything.
SmokyMo wrote: » I am sympathetic to people who bought recently as everyone situation is different.
Idbatterim wrote: » totally ridiculous, but is it not more ridiculous that his neighbours are getting it free. I mean seriously, there is outrage that he hasnt paid the rent, and yes the system here with regards evictions is a joke, always the victim, never to blame! I find it hilarious here the way the media wont touch issues like this with a bargepole, its why pretty much the entire population here is conditioned to think that this lunatic asylum, is actually normal. I really foresee massive issues here coming down the line, they just take ridiculously long to manifest! way longer than you would expect...