markodaly wrote: » I know its nice and all to beat the government over the schools issue, but is any blame going to go to the Teacher Unions who seem to be dictating policy now. The people elected the government, we didn't elect the Unions to run our education system.
smurgen wrote: » Well this is awkward. Mate of then Taoiseach gets copy of confidential contract before Minister of Health. In any other country he would be gone or arrested.https://twitter.com/PearseDoherty/status/1351787381398102016?s=19
FreudianSlippers wrote: » Wait again, or is this just a repost of the same story from before Christmas (early November?)?
McMurphy wrote: » Read the linked to article. It covers foi documents previously not covered. It's not difficult really.
Bowie wrote: » The unions represent the teachers interests. Maybe the government should take responsibility for whatever it is they do.
FrancieBrady wrote: » Would finish off any normal TD in any normal party.
FreudianSlippers wrote: » It's considered good form to provide a bit of background to your posts and to be open to questions on what you're posting. It's not difficult really.
Deleted User wrote: » Any normal country,what went on there would be a serious offence,with likely a jail term of several years In eire,its somehow the oppositions fault,and no responsibility needed
FrancieBrady wrote: » Simon Harris dragged into the mire too. Shows himself to be a servile lackey tbh.
Bishop of hope wrote: » It looks like Leo jumped the gun. The minister hadn't got a copy because the deal wasn't finalised even as Leo posted a copy to a nobody really. Of course it's back in the headlines, it looks incredibly bad and this is a new twist given that everybody on the govt side said the deal was finalised, but it now appears that wasn't the case.https://www.irishtimes.com/news/politics/varadkar-leaked-gp-contract-while-minister-for-health-was-urgently-seeking-copy-1.4462651?mode=amp
smurgen wrote: » It's his main defense torpedoed. He mislead the Dail. Also Simon Harris said he had fill confidence in Varadkar. What basis was that on? Did he know that Varadkar had sent a document that he as minister of Health was waiting on out to someone not involved in the negotiations?
Deleted User wrote: » because the government worked to.coverup school outbreaks.. The unions,particularly teachers,are often chancers,but in this instance,their 100% in right to look after the health and welfare,and working conditions of their members Its incomprehensible to me,that the government didnt plan for possibility of having to close schools a 2nd time, Did government slash ppe money to schools?
McMurphy wrote: » Really? I thought it was expected to provide links to a story you were commenting on, which happened here on this occasion. I think what you did, was jump in two feet first with a comment, instead of actually reading the article linked to. People won't be taking you by the hand and guiding you I'm afraid.
smurgen wrote: » The new details are in the tweet. Literally right there.
Floppybits wrote: » What you need background to the then Taoiseach leaking a confidential document to his mate before it published. The the same Tainiste stands up in the Dail and lies about it and now under FOI the Irish Times and discovered that not only did he leak the document to his mate, the then Health Minister didn't have a copy of it. Varadkar has lied through his teeth through this whole thing and anyone with an ounce of decency can see that and by right Varadkar should be sacked.
smurgen wrote: » It's his main defense torpedoed. He mislead the Dail. Also Simon Harris said he had full confidence in Varadkar. What basis was that on? Did he know that Varadkar had sent a document that he as minister of Health was waiting on out to someone not involved in the negotiations?
Deleted User wrote: » why are you cursing?
Deleted User wrote: » Shopworkers can manage. Why not teachers of special needs children?
grayzer75 wrote: » Who's going to look after the teachers kids?
Deleted User wrote: » Seems so....didnt holohan say schools represent significant risk?