FrancieBrady wrote: » Quite possibly, yes. Why would it happenig last year make a difference? A border poll is relevant since Brexit. You can see the quote I posted, where Lockhart talks about what Robinson said. It's in 'quotes'. I asked you to tip us off whenever the two politicians deny they said it. The Telegraph are quoting stuff people never said now too???? :D:D
Junkyard Tom wrote: » I'd imagine Belfast will get sailings in a few months time when the north's economy reorients itself.
downcow wrote: » So Francie, you think that Gavin Robinson is telling lies about the fact that he did not mention a border poll
and that the interview was an old one from last year? Which the Irish News decided to misrepresent as breaking news on a no news day?
I cannot see what the other two sitting Unionist politicians said as I do not pay for the Belfast Telegraph. Maybe you could help us and shared the actual quotes you are talking about? - quotes from the politicians please, not from journalists
downcow wrote: » if they hold to those identities then they come in second place to the Northern Irishness.
jm08 wrote: » So, in other words its a compromised 'identity' that people can live with. Great.
downcow wrote: » ........ again, that is not even close to what I said. In fact I did not even in what Northern Irish indicated. But now that you raise it, I believe it indicates a growing number of people who are very comfortable not being referred to as either Irish or British, and if they hold to those identities then they come in second place to the Northern Irishness.
BonnieSituation wrote: » I dunno about that, I see more disgust and hatred levied towards FF than I do FG among my nationalist friends. Whatever about oul wans long memories over John Bruton and VAT on children's shoes, Jack Lynch's lilly-liveredness is still a sore point around Tyrone and South Armagh.
Junkyard Tom wrote: » Trust me, when people from a Catholic/Nationalist background catch on to the fact that Unionists, like you, are using the term 'northern Irish' to indicate support for British rule they'll drop it quicker than the Tories did the DUP.
downcow wrote: » A few posters on here - I am not sure if you were one of them - some time ago suggested that Northern Ireland would be at the bottom of the pecking order with regard to vaccinations in the UK. That seems to be another Republican fantasy. You are making a very subjective thing about people across the world thinking the UK is a basket case. The UK is still in the very top, if not the top, of places in the world that young people want to relocate in and/or spend a gap year in. So this is just more Republican fantasy
jm08 wrote: » You are hoping. If that was the case, why did Cosgrave bury the agreement for 50 years? What was he afraid of? Was it that no one would ever vote for Fine Gael again if they knew that? Edit: Obviously, the problem that FG has in the event of a UI, is that they know they will never get a nationalist vote from north of the border. They will be finished as a political party unless they can do some sort of a deal with unionists.
downcow wrote: » I think it reflects the rise Northern Ireland identity - but a scary thought for Republicans
Junkyard Tom wrote: » I'm happy for people in GB and the north of Ireland that they're getting vaccinated. That said I don't think you understand that the UK is a viewed as a veritable basket case in the world media, with some of the worst COVID19 death rates, as well as the self-inflicted harm of Brexit.
jm08 wrote: » At the bottom of one of those articles linked about, there was a comment from that pollster from Liverpool university who said that at the time of the GFA, 40% of those polled described themselves as unionist. That has now decreased to 28% (I think without checking - in the 20s anyway). That doesn't suggest support for a UI, but it says very clearly that support for maintaining the Union is decreasing.
downcow wrote: » This will be more evidence for some here that Northern Ireland is a failure, and another reason to get out of the UK quick LOLhttps://ibb.co/HY37q9j
blanch152 wrote: » The argument that the ROI can't afford NI has absolutely nothing to do with historical issues, it is a simple fact of economics and politics.
Junkyard Tom wrote: » That Unionists are so terrified of a border poll shows that they have no real confidence in their 'precious union'. I personally think Unionists would win a border poll fairly comfortably if it was held soon.
jm08 wrote: » We don't know the criteria as to how he decides that. Someone posted here that Colin Harvey was an eejit for writing to the SoS asking him what the criteria are for his decision. Its typical British ambiguity/fudging. If I was FG, I'd be shouting for a referendum now before a few more 100 year anniversaries are arrived at, because when the period of the foundation of the State is more widely known, FG will not have a leg to stand on. For instance, the argument that the ROI can't afford NI when NI was basically sold off by Cosgrave to clear the national debt and this agreement then buried until 1969.
downcow wrote: » I see we have slipped into second place in Europe, behind England, on what is undoubtedly the most important issue facing every country in the world at this time. This will be more evidence for some here that Northern Ireland is a failure, and another reason to get out of the UK quick LOLhttps://ibb.co/HY37q9j
downcow wrote: » haha. Tom just sums up the reason why Unionists would be mad to start discussing a border poll. It would just feed his fantasy. He would hang on every word discussed and twist it to suit his dreamy thoughts about a beautiful united Ireland. Tom you are not on your own - there is a small minority out there who think like you.
FrancieBrady wrote: » Good to see you agree that is rubbish. Of course Unionists are discussing a border poll because they have to, they would be fools not to, as you say.