BBall2015 wrote: » For EU legislation we're allowed use, what one did people find more useful in the exam? Blackstone’s EU Treaties & Legislation or The Consolidated European Union Treaties and Charter of Fundamental Rights by the Office of Official? I'm not sure which one to buy!
L.E.D wrote: » Hi everyone, Attempting property this time around, anyone have any tips etc? I know succession comes up in two questions, is that definitely? And any other topics that would be good to learn? Thanks a million
fe12021 wrote: » I had 4 in a row with the old timetable and I'm not convinced it makes a massive difference to how you revise (until much closer to the time ofc), especially since either way they're taking place within a two week period (as opposed to being scattered across a month and therefore dictating which you revise first etc). Sorry, just think this sort of thing is always about luck and it's not really fair to ask for that to be changed since this will always be a problem for some people.
Sesh0nm0m wrote: » Does anyone know now will our rechecks be back before the application deadline at the end of February? And if not can we add extra subjects on to the application later if we apply for the ones that we were gonna be sitting anyways and then just add another subject on if your recheck isn't successful?
nmurphy1441 wrote: » It’ll be cutting it tight before the deadline! I’d imagine they’ll do their best. From what I remember on this thread, a few people had to apply to sit an exam or two because they’re rechecks weren’t back in time. If the re check was successful, they were allowed to claim a refund. Although I think you’d be waiting months for a refund. Someone on this might be able to clarify this though...
NewFe1 wrote: » I used the email address that they use to email me on all the time.
Sesh0nm0m wrote: » Can you add them on to your application after the 22nd of February though? Also I don't feel like studying for them again to be honest when I know that at least one of my grades was dead wrong
mydogwentroof wrote: » What bloody difference is pushing it back 3 weeks going to make??
Lallers96 wrote: » Is there anything to be said for setting up a Training Contract thread? I feel as if there is little to no support for people who have graduated on how to get one, bar generic advise about what to include on a CV which is all very obvious anyway.
FE1Nov20 wrote: » There appears to have been one set up recently regarding TC's - if you search Law Firm Milkrounds 20/21. I tried to attach the link but it won't let me post it unfortunately
Lallers96 wrote: » Thank you I did not notice this! Not used to boards
malayali wrote: » The Final Examination - First Part (FE-1) is the entrance examination to the Law Society of Ireland. As you will be aware, the public health environment has deteriorated significantly and unexpectedly over the past weeks. The Society realises that many candidates are experiencing difficulties preparing for the next sitting of the FE-1 while adapting to these very challenging circumstances.
APower79 wrote: » Hi, I hope most of you are ok with the pushing forward of the next exams and congrats to those who passed the November exams. I’m sitting criminal (my first exam, not a law graduate and much older than a lot of you!) next March. I’ve got my notes sorted and have most examiners reports. Have a few sample answers but need some more. Starting to work on those from next week. I only have a a couple of hrs max a day. Any advice?! Thanks!
APower79 wrote: » Why can’t they return a script with comments like in most exams? Then you know where you’ve gone wrong or why you did well. Why just a mark and no explanation. So lazy. This wouldn’t be accepted in many institutions
IgoPAP wrote: » It's so they can arbitrarily give you whatever grade they like.