Deleted User wrote: » Can I ask what firm that is? Arthur Cox had an assessment to submit with their milk round application last October too ��
Lawstudent123 wrote: » I'm wondering if anyone can help me with the case note for Constitutional. Is there a list of cases you need to learn or is it best to just go through past exam papers and make a list of all the cases that have come up in the last 10 years or so? Would appreciate any guidance
Hazel774 wrote: » Has anyone been receiving responses to their emails to the Law Society?
BookFast wrote: » Sorry if this is an annoying question but I can't find information on it anywhere on the LS website (shock), does anyone know when the awards for results are announced? And what results usually obtain an award, are we talking 75% plus?
IgoPAP wrote: » If remote sittings are the reason why the exams have seemingly - - and in plenty of cases, arbitrarily - - marked harder, it needs to be done away with as soon as possible.
123456789j wrote: » Hi guys... seeing as the last year has been such a mess regarding disruptions to fe1s, would it not be reasonable to seek an additional sitting sometime in the summer, similar to last year? I know in my own personal case, I had difficulty booking work off for November as I has already taken leave in October. Has put me under enormous pressure for September now.
FE1Hopefully1 wrote: » I’d definitely would help but I just can’t see them doing it - the august sitting caused the same Problems with results and timetables and no time between the sitting and the October one Unless they try hold one in June/July but I just can’t see them doing so tbh I could be completely wrong and they may even be considering it so no harm asking
AlexTG356 wrote: » Would wonder if it's a combination of this and the introduction of the new rules, such as the sit before you graduate and the removal of the sit four and pass three (not that I have anything against them, as I've benefitted from them). It makes the exams more accessible so I wonder does that make the standard of marking goes up?
IgoPAP wrote: » Extra exam sittings, although creating some complications, would be beneficial I think. A summer sitting would be great.
Sesh0nm0m wrote: » This would be the dream and it would be fair also to those of you starting TCs but from the way your one sounded on the phone yesterday they don't care about extra sittings and they definitely won't be pushing it back. Also I don't think the examiners will want to write new papers. In August it was only the EU examiner who had to write a new paper as nobody sat tort so they could use the same one. Important to note the examiners probably caused this issue in the first place by just pulling grades out of their ass with no justification.
FE1student560 wrote: » Well that's my training contract revoked. Just off the phone with my would-be employer. No point resitting company in March now. I've been in complete shock for 24 hours. I had no expectation of failing that exam and I found out I was 13% short. This year has just been awful and this certainly caps it off. No idea where I go from here. I hope everyone else has better luck than me and manages to get through these nonsensical exams.
nmurphy1441 wrote: » I know it has been said in this thread already but can someone tell me what to know for company and what topics appear most frequently!!!???
