schmittel wrote: » WFH here to stay:https://www.irishtimes.com/news/ireland/irish-news/new-laws-will-give-employees-in-the-state-the-option-to-permanently-work-from-home-1.4458770
PropQueries wrote: » Many workers now have up to an extra two hours a day to play with due to less commuting etc. Maybe they are using that time to seek additional approvals so it wouldn't be impacting much on their "productivity".
PropQueries wrote: » I wonder how this would play out under EU law? Can an Irish company really force someone to live in Ireland if they're WFH permanently?
Cyrus wrote: » yes there is a broader answer here regarding permanent establishments for tax etc but you can look into it yourself.
PropQueries wrote: » Well, given that it's only now that the Irish and other EU countries are looking into updating their WFH laws to reflect this new reality, I don't believe tax residency etc. to keep workers tied to Ireland will play out at an EU level much longer, especially if the relatively low cost countries in the EU spot an opportunity to gain from the WFH.
tigger123 wrote: » I would imagine that any rules regarding WFH would/could include that you must be ordinarily resident in the State, and that you can be called to attend the workplace at short notice, should it be required. I highly doubt it will be a cart blanche to live on a Mediterranean Island.
Mic 1972 wrote: » In order to pay tax in Ireland an employee must work at least 6 months in Ireland. Companies can however applying further limitations to that. I was hired into a WFH position with no space for me in the office, however I need to sign companies forms and get approvals to work from another country for limited time
PropQueries wrote: » Isn't that the same kind of logic as saying back in say 1860 that the motor car will never take off because the laws, regulations, infrastructure etc. don't currently allow for it?
Timing belt wrote: » what are you are implying isa standard Eu tax at all levels...if that is adopted the there might be validity in what you are claiming.... maybe you should read up on the topic
Cyrus wrote: » id say the devil will be in the detail, look at the headline you quoted, gives employees the right to request to WFH, what does that even mean?
Cyrus wrote: » it takes 15 min to get AIP and why are you putting productivity in inverted commas?
schmittel wrote: » No doubt the devil is in the detail, but the big picture is nonetheless interesting: the government is positioning policy changes to maximise WFH where possible. One of their key pillars is heavy investment in regional infrastructure to create as conducive an environment as possible for both employees and employers to embrace WFH. This will accelerate the trend of internal migration in Ireland out of Dublin - this is what the government is trying to achieve. I'm quick to criticise them when they introduce half baked policy with obvious unintended consequences, so credit where it is due, I think this is a good initiative by government.
PropQueries wrote: » Well, I think it would be interesting if the data was there to look at. Two years ago, people might have applied to 2 or 3 lenders seeking approval. Now they might apply to 4 or 5. The approvals statistics might then show that e.g. 3,000 unique people were approved for a mortgage in November, when it may have only being e.g. 1,500. It's a big difference when attempting to predict future demand for housing and would be especially important to developers when planning their construction targets for 2021?
Hubertj wrote: » Definitely opens opportunities for people to make lifestyle changes. Only not of caution would be how policies differ between employers. For example, current employer might allow full wfh or only 1 day in office requirement. Based on that you move to clifden or roundstone. You then change job for some reason (redundancy, career progression etc) and are required in office 3 days a week. Clifden to Dublin is not feasible multiple days per week despite what some have suggested in the past. Big decision to make but good to have the option to consider it.
odyssey06 wrote: » I thought I read something to the effect that multinationals need to have certain employees based in Ireland to qualify to be taxed under Irish corporate tax rates... They might be ok with some exceptional cases of employees working from another EU country, but not as a general policy.
schmittel wrote: » This idea about people suddenly working from the beach abroad sipping pina coladas is a ridiculous red herring.
fliball123 wrote: » Where are you getting this bull why would someone a few years ago suddenly jump to 4 or 5 from 2 to 3 my god your really spinning there slow down your going to make yourself dizzy
schmittel wrote: » This idea about people suddenly working from the beach abroad sipping pina coladas is a ridiculous red herring. The impact will be felt because a certain amount of people who may intend to buy or have already bought in Dublin/Kildare/Wicklow/Meath etc will now be able to consider options further afield within Ireland.
Browney7 wrote: » The landlords of boards.ie need a 6% minimum rental yield to pay them and compensate them for the remote risk of a rogue tenant blowing their house up so it'll be interesting to see how low yields go and whether it will be fuelled by reducing rents or increasing property values.
PommieBast wrote: » Out of interest what is the going rate for insuring against this, or is it one of those things underwriters will not touch with a barge-pole?
PropQueries wrote: » I wonder how this would play out under EU law? Can an Irish company really force someone to live in Ireland if they're WFH permanently? Especially since Ireland is only a 2 to 4 hour Ryanair plane ride away from most other EU countries. Not much more commuting time, in many cases, than commuting from Galway to Dublin for an important meeting etc.?
PropQueries wrote: » The internet. More advanced online meeting tools e.g. zoom, skype etc. A bit quicker than a few years ago.
PropQueries wrote: » I wonder how this would play out under EU law? Can an Irish company really force someone to live in Ireland if they're WFH permanently? Especially since Ireland is only a 2 to 4 hour Ryanair plane ride away from most other EU countries. Not much more commuting time, in many cases, than commuting from Galway to Dublin for an important meeting etc.? With our government worried about the impact of the upcoming OECD tax reforms on our future corporation taxes, maybe they should be more worried about the future income tax competition from the Mediterranean countries who are already trying to lure remote workers with tax breaks etc. Given how reliant we are on our relatively high income taxes and will be on future carbon taxes, property taxes etc., this could cause more problems than anything the OECD tax reforms throw at us over the next two years. Link to CNBC article on Greece income tax breaks for remote workers here: https://www.cnbc.com/2020/11/12/greece-to-cut-taxes-for-remote-workers-in-post-covid-recovery-effort.html
We are targeting companies that want to open offices in Greece due to Brexit, Greeks abroad who want to return to Greece, digital migrants or tech companies; anybody or any company that wants to open (an) office in Greece
fliball123 wrote: » Skype is here over 10 years ,internet even longer. Poeple have been able to go through mortgage approvals online for 8/9 years now at least if not longer. I cant see a reason why suddenly in 2020 why the jump to 4/5 approvals per person would be true. You have absolutely no evidence of it so unless you do please stop using your thinking to be truth.