pinkypinky wrote: » It is very enjoyable, but massively anachronistic (and not even consistent therein).
Mad_maxx wrote: » awful sh1te , thankfully herself grew bored after three or four episodes
Sleepy wrote: » Watched this with Mrs Sleepy and I found it's use of race very unsettling. Of course there were people of colour in London in that era but they certainly weren't Dukes or Queen Consorts... the whole thing seemed to utterly gloss over the fact that the very type of characters being portrayed by people of colour in this series largely lived their lives of luxury off the backs of the slaves they owned in the colonies..
Aisling(",) wrote: » It is addressed albeit very quickly.The duke and his aunt have a conversation about how their position is precarious as people of colour only rose in status because the king fell in love with a black woman and made her his queen. It's a fluffy period drama/romance.I wouldn't be reading much into it.It meant they had a bigger pool of actors to pull from and its not as though its a true story.
Sleepy wrote: » Yes, but that throwaway line wouldn't justify their whitewashing of Britain's extremely dodgy past imo. If they wanted to include people of colour in the nobility, the way to do it was to set it in a fantasy world, not regency era Britain.
Season 2 teaser