sumo12 wrote: » Got talking to a very helpful tech guy in Pure this evening, here is the explanation he gave me: Router sends out signals in 2.4g or 5g. Phone, laptop randomly connects to either. Max speed on 2.4g is 100mb. This explains the fluctuations in my connection speed. He split my wireless networks into 2.4g and 5g and told me to connect phones etc, to 5g and smart home stuff to 2.4g. Download consistently 400-450mb on phone now - he says this is the max you will get wirelessly and older devices will not be capable of this speed anyway. Some laptops even with ethernet not capable of top speeds. Apologies if you all knew this anyway and a further apology for being late to the knowledge....
schmoo2k wrote: » I thought you said you had tested when connected via cable to router? As long as your cable was a cat6 or cat 5e you should be getting the full speed?
sumo12 wrote: » Not unless the laptop ethernet port can handle the speed is what tech guy explained to me, only newer laptops will be capable of the speed. My ethernet laptop is old and my new laptop doesn't have an ethernet port
Stone wrote: » You can get gigabit speed USB ethernet dongles ..... readily available on e.g. Amazon etc.
oscarBravo wrote: » I'd say it's highly unlikely that a laptop too old to have a gigabit Ethernet port will be able to reliably deliver gigabit on USB.
Stone wrote: » True perhaps ... yeah, my bad But if it has USB3 ports then it will work ....
jelem wrote: » 10 year old laptops with gig lan - SO dont sound too factual as reason unless your devices are rated lower
Marlow wrote: » Gig lan port does not mean CPU can utilize a gig. It just means it can utilise more than 100 Mbit/s. Important difference. /M
jelem wrote: » lol i just one of majority whom because government is involved in and supports Cartel and Monopolies in telecom in ireland-- status is unless i sign up to a monopoly (there is no competition and competition authority has NO teeth - purposefully set by corrupt government to avoid criminal charges), i cannot get more than 11Mb and i am in estste in south county dublin paying "THEFT" charges and no option but to move to poorer service "resellers". This thread along with its contributors constantly Fail to point out "it is the government that is guilty of you receiving a poor service". even the eu funds for nb rollout is going to private profit companies with political timetables for political sound bites. YOU (not abusive CAPS but to highlight) are responding to an individual whom is very tech savvy and learning each day more of how the citizens are being abused and ripped off by corrupt and incompetant FF\FG governments. even the pathetic excuse greens are willing to plant a large environmental footprint ie x kilometres of cable (manufacure\raw materials\transport etc. instead of hi-tech 5G towers which cover 1 tower 18 miles - hence 2 towers cover dublin and more. this of course so it can be broken up ans given away to telcos. whom will rip off the citizens with what has been paid for by citizens and eu. read my posts on many subjects and all point to the theft by corrupt government.
jelem wrote: » ...2 towers cover dublin and more.
jelem wrote: » lol i just one of majority whom because government is involved in and supports Cartel and Monopolies in telecom in ireland-- status is unless i sign up to a monopoly (there is no competition and competition authority has NO teeth - purposefully set by corrupt government to avoid criminal charges), i cannot get more than 11Mb and i am in estste in south county dublin paying "THEFT" charges and no option but to move to poorer service "resellers". This thread along with its contributors constantly Fail to point out "it is the government that is guilty of you receiving a poor service". even the eu funds for nb rollout is going to private profit companies with political timetables for political sound bites. YOU (not abusive CAPS but to highlight) are responding to an individual whom is very tech savvy and learning each day more of how the citizens are being abused and ripped off by corrupt and incompetant FF\FG governments. even the pathetic excuse greens are willing to plant a large environmental footprint ie x kilometres of cable (manufacure\raw materials\transport etc. instead of hi-tech 5G towers which cover 1 tower 18 miles - hence 2 towers cover dublin and more. this of course so it can be broken up ans given away to telcos. whom will rip off the citizens with what has been paid for by citizens and eu.read my posts on many subjects and all point to the theft by corrupt government.
dionsiseire wrote: » I've been running a speed test from a hard wired Raspberry Pi every 5 minutes over the last 3 days. Never once did I break 300mb on the speed tests to a local vodafone server. I feel like something is being throttled, if it was contention in any way at night the numbers would have jumped. I've restarted the router a few times and tried double checking configs for anything that might be limiting but still no joy.
schmoo2k wrote: » What version Pi - if its a 3 then that is all you would expect to get?
dionsiseire wrote: » Nope it's a 4, gigabit ethernet port on it. Was part of the reason I decided to use it for this purpose. Here's an example of ithttps://www.evernote.com/shard/s467/sh/bb81bf9a-1c66-4e70-8ebe-6580391709fa/bab7aa2f1cfbc4c7/res/1f2ee925-6056-4fd7-a2f9-f7112d23dd51 Changed to link. Image wasn't showing when embedded
Both boards (3 and 4) have gigabit Ethernet, but the speed of the Raspberry Pi's 3's Ethernet is constrained by relying on a USB 2.0 bridge, which limits the maximum throughput to about 300Mbps, compared to true Gigabit Ethernet on the Pi 4.
TheDriver wrote: » Have you gotten gigabit speeds on it before? Over a LAN even? Just to rule out device issues
schmoo2k wrote: » When I saw your 300mb upper figure, it rang some bells...
dionsiseire wrote: » Yeah with ethernet I expect 10/100/1000 to be upper edge limits. 260mb seems the average pretty universally across the board right now. During the day it's probably expected with others on the line but overnight it not spiking to the 700-900 is unusual I would think.
CoBo55 wrote: » Got their email this morning, yep still no sign of it going live, the rolls of fibre dotted around the town are almost a year old now, what a shambles of an outfit.
schmoo2k wrote: » Getting fibre to my Pole on Thursday!
CoBo55 wrote: » There's fibre outside my front door and there it stops. Did you get an install date?
schmoo2k wrote: » Nope - but I am in contract with Virgin until November anyway. Its just this pole is about 4 hops in from the road on private grounds (serving about 4 houses), so the fact they are doing it "unprompted" is great.