jh79 wrote: » That's exactly what I'm asking, which sections of the report are extrapolated from the subvention/transfer rather than figures such employment levels in NI versus other regions of the EU?
Junkyard Tom wrote: » It's all trivial. We've been at this for hundreds of years and you puke up two opinion pieces on possible problems and think you can derail unification? You're really not getting this, are you?
droidman123 wrote: » This is the most disingenuous post i have read on this thread
downcow wrote: » I am just now watching bbc news and there is an article on about the mother and baby homes crisis in Roi. Something like one in seven kids ended up dead. My mind went to the arrogance of this thread title and some of the posters on it. For somebody living in a state with the many horrific closets that Roi has over last 99 years - to question if your neighbouring state has been a failure over the same 99years is just sheer arrogance and deflection. Quite simply unbelievable. Ni has had huge challenges and problems over last 99 years but it would be rediculous if the focus of our interests were, considering has our neighbouring country been a failure.
jh79 wrote: » It'll be 100 years more if Republicans like yourself keeping burying your heads in the sand instead of looking for solutions.
grayzer75 wrote: » The two main parties in government are the same parties that governed through the whole thing and should be held accountable.
ELM327 wrote: » Theres clearly solutions in place already and we're working towards it. The GFA provides the mechanism and we're nearly at the 50% +1 vote which is all that is needed.
jh79 wrote: » According to this about 20 years away.https://www.reuters.com/article/us-britain-nireland-poll/poll-shows-northern-ireland-majority-against-united-ireland-idUSKBN20C0WI
jm08 wrote: » How many times has it to be explained to you that people in NI when asked for how they would vote, won't say what they think. They need the secrecy of the ballot box. Its doubly true when someone with an English accent asks them the question (as happened in that poll - it was an English polling company).
jh79 wrote: » Maybe that's true for some people but to have a significant effect seems unlikely to me.
Looking at opinion polls can provide more confusion than clarity. For instance, in February this year two polls offered widely different results on the constitutional question. A poll by Liverpool University and Britain’s Economic and Social Research Council found 29 per cent would vote for a united Ireland “tomorrow” while 52 per cent would vote against. Excluding the “don’t knows”, it had 65 per cent favouring the union, 35 per cent for unity.Brexit The same month a LucidTalk poll, commissioned by the investigative website The Detail, examined how Brexit was affecting views on Northern Ireland’s constitutional future. It found 46.8 per cent would vote to maintain the union while 45.4 per cent would vote for a united Ireland. Those figures were flipped around in a survey by pollster Lord Ashcroft, former Conservative Party treasurer, in September last year. If there were a Border poll tomorrow, that poll had 46 per cent saying they would vote for a united Ireland and 45 per cent voting to stay in the union. When the “don’t knows” were excluded the result was 51 per cent for unity, 49 per cent for the union.
What's your excuse for those in the Republic? We've already had Francie's risible "its not a tax it's a contribution" excuse. Do you think the average PAYE worker thinks the USC is not a tax?
downcow wrote: » I am just now watching bbc news and there is an article on about the mother and baby homes crisis in Roi. Something like one in seven kids ended up dead.
jh79 wrote: » Maybe that's true for some people but to have a significant effect seems unlikely to me. What's your excuse for those in the Republic? We've already had Francie's risible "its not a tax it's a contribution" excuse. Do you think the average PAYE worker thinks the USC is not a tax?
FrancieBrady wrote: » The average PAYE wrker has paid for almost everything this state has done. That is what you are up against here. Had those who took the leap to independence been so selfish as you are, we'd be still a part of the UK. People, or not all of the people, won't frame it in totally economic terms jh79.
jh79 wrote: » The opposite is a reckless approach where we borrow and end up with a dysfunctional 32 county republic.
Junkyard Tom wrote: » Everyone in Ireland is appalled and ashamed of this. Meanwhile, every summer, you lot still celebrate the death, destruction, and disenfranchisement, you've wrought on Ireland for centuries. To this very day Unionists still kick-and-scream over the visibility of the native language. We won't take lectures from Unionists on such issues.
Natterjack from Kerry wrote: » There is a lot of obsolete thinking in this post. With the issue of any 32 County country now settled, it is the responsibility of all on the island to work together. There is a great opportunity for all. NI is in a terrific position to develop itself, and th South can both help and benefit from this too. The deal also presents a super opportunity for the South. It can benefit from a booming North, and its close contact enables it to piggyback on many of the advantages NI has now gained. Talk of unification and border polls etc has no role anymore and is only counter productive to what really matters - the peace, prosperity, and every closer links between both jurisdictions, without getting hung up on petty issues like a single 32 county sovereignty. Such a discussion was valid speculation during the Brexit process when an entirely different outcome was possible. But no longer. Both Irelands can now move on, leaving its disputes of history as for historians only, and work on the betterment together of the island, with its two jurisdictions, as a whole.
FrancieBrady wrote: » :D From where I am sitting partition has a lot to do with why we are still a dysfunctional society. Like it or not, those cast aside and ignored by the oh so 'functional' members of our society are going to get a say and it isn't going to be all about finances.
Natterjack from Kerry wrote: » With the issue of any 32 County country now settled...
Natterjack from Kerry wrote: » There is a lot of obsolete thinking in this post. With the issue of any 32 County country now settled,
jm08 wrote: » I'd say considerably more babies died in the UK through abortion. Thats how the UK dealt with it.
Junkyard Tom wrote: »
FrancieBrady wrote: » Amost as mind numbling shocking to see that written as it was to read downcow gloating about still having all the benefits and rights of the EU. Reality checks incoming for some.
ELM327 wrote: » The amount of side steps attempted by some sides is funny. From claiming the "petty" issue is settled, to trying to strawman in everything from the tuam babies to abortion. The reality is you can only bang the drum so many times before it breaks. And I think in terms of reuinification, the levee was broken, ironically, by a brexit vote driven by English nationalists.
FrancieBrady wrote: » Huge conundrum