Bowie wrote: » They aren't responsible for anything and powerless...so when it was going well that was on the public too? What do we need the government for so? Should we not pay them PUP and get on with it ourselves or maybe put accountable solid leadership in? What do you think?
McMurphy wrote: » Of course bish, of course it's down to some people visiting beauty spots outside their 5km restriction zones, silly me of course it is. I think the fly in your ointment though, might be the fact hundreds of thousands of folk likely visited these spots when Lockdown restrictions were eased or lifted completely and yet we weren't in the highest infected rates in the entire world. Obviously, the fact we have recently become the country in the whole world less than two weeks after new year, and the govt ignoring the advice given to them by NPHET in the run up to Xmas is an unfortunate and entirely coincidental fluke. Let Michaél and Leo stand on a platform during the next election campaign and try and sell that kind of pup to the electorate and see how they get on. You lads are unreal.
Bishop of hope wrote: » No its not and that's despite the figures being in the thousands. It's the truth.
McMurphy wrote: » White noise, scutter and deflection.
Deleted User wrote: » Yep. Absolute cretins putting themselves and others at risk. “ Gardaí have escalated their policing response after beauty spots across the country were packed over the weekend with visitors outside of their 5km limit.” https://www.independent.ie/news/gardai-can-now-hand-on-the-spot-fines-of-100-to-anyone-breaking-5km-travel-limit-who-refuse-to-turn-back-39956585.html “ PEOPLE HAVE BEEN told to reconsider travelling to the Wicklow uplands partly due to the Covid-19 risk of a rescue situation. A spokesperson for the Dublin and Wicklow Mountain Rescue team, Valerie Hayes, said social distancing is difficult during emergency rescues” https://www.thejournal.ie/wicklow-warning-do-not-travel-mountain-5321617-Jan2021/ “ Kerry Mountain Rescue is asking hill-goers to be considerate of the strain being put on emergency services at this time before attempting a climb. They urge people to avoid "high mountain terrain such as the McGillycuddy’s Reeks, sticking to lowland paths and walkways while strictly observing social distancing principles and the 5km travel restrictions recently re-imposed by the Government." https://www.irishexaminer.com/news/munster/arid-40201829.html
McMurphy wrote: » Headline in the Indo at 1900 on the 11/01/2020 Senior hurlers of FFG allowed for this headline to be created.. There's a shytstorm on the way due to these absolute cretins. Well done lads, well done.
Bishop of hope wrote: » But you and Francie and others are prepared to argue about a few emails that seem to be of the same opinion of Leo a couple of months ago. There's something very troubling about some perspectives on here.
Bishop of hope wrote: » That's the impression the last few pages have been giving. Not singling you out Blaaz, but it's like disbelief that a few emails might have been sent in support of him. Old I'll call it. Obsessive Leo Disorder.
[Deleted User] wrote: » Wha?? That isnt close to what i said,and wasnt implied...i apoligise for giving impression on this to you
[Deleted User] wrote: » I mean like the emails were the focus of . an article in todays paper Like if this isnt current affairs,in light if what has happened since,what is??
Bowie wrote: » Nobody tries to shut down criticism of FG/LV more than yourself. The covid rates were raised you pointed up north and to SF. The PR spin article was commented on, you've spent pages dismissing the claims. I think FG supporters have a voice. Some of us don't have a team and want to talk issues as they arise. Today it's covid numbers and a biased spin article. Personally I'm more interested in the issues.
blanch152 wrote: » So what if half of the 55 supporting him were FG supporters? There were 68 emails on the subject, according to the last Irish Times poll, FG had 35% support, meaning that 24 of the emails would be supportive from FG supporters - not far off the 27 you complain about!!! Are FG supporters not allowed to have a voice?It seems that some are trying to create an echo chamber in here, only criticism of Leo is allowed.
FrancieBrady wrote: » You have denied every criticism of Leo since the thread has started blanch and of FG's role in government. FG are indeed allowed a voice but that still doesn't provide us with any clarity on where these emails came from and from whom. This politician has no problems pulling the wool over people's eyes if it is for party.
blanch152 wrote: » So what if half of the 55 supporting him were FG supporters? There were 68 emails on the subject, according to the last Irish Times poll, FG had 35% support, meaning that 24 of the emails would be supportive from FG supporters - not far off the 27 you complain about!!! Are FG supporters not allowed to have a voice? It seems that some are trying to create an echo chamber in here, only criticism of Leo is allowed.
blanch152 wrote: » Who said he was appeasing 55 random e-mailers??!!?? They came in AFTER his statement, not before.
Deleted User wrote: » I dont thinķ appeasing 55 random e-mailers were worth causing ireland to have worst infection rates in the world
the butcher wrote: » You speak about facts but in reality we cannot confirm the authenticity of the email addresses, how many can we link to real genuine people? Are half of them FG supporters? I'd like to see the factual breakdown of that.
blanch152 wrote: » Except it wasn't. It was a journalist making a factual FOI request and reporting factually on what he discovered. You see it as spin because it runs against your biased worldview, nothing more, nothing less.
Jinglejangle69 wrote: » Posters here conveniently forgetting NHPET were gonna allow household meet ups at the start of December but the government delayed it for weeks.
Bowie wrote: » ...and factually spinning PR for Varadkar/FG. It's an article showing people agreed with Varadkar taking a strop with NPHET during a pandemic. Nobody denies he took a strop. Only 55 people allegedly disagree, that we know of, yet this is considered a worthy news item? It's spin because it puts Varadkar's foolishness and childishness in a better light. Any article doing such can only be read as spin.