ToddDameron wrote: » It says a lot about your view of the world when someone questioning whether there is police bias is automatically right wing.
ToddDameron wrote: » So serious that someone got shot in the neck and killed, justifiably so. Not buying the police bias on this one, the issue in the beginning was that police were outnumbered, and you know why that was. Yet the narrative is that they willingly let them in, not sure how a handful of police are expected to stop thousands of people.
FatherTed wrote: » Podium guy is arrested in Florida...https://twitter.com/miamiherald/status/1347883517145919494?s=21
correct horse battery staple wrote: » 7 years back they wouldn’t let me in, Library of Congress beside it did allow people in but security was strict, was told by I presume plainclothed Ss officer to move along when taking photo outside White House, same for federal reserve nearby The whole area around mall probably has highest concentration in world of security yet these rioters just walked in.
Joeytheparrot wrote: » I didnt think they would try to impeach him but if they do he cant run again in 4 years so I think they will
Carfacemandog wrote: » Police have announced that a pickup truck with guns and bombs has been found nearbyhttps://nbc-2.com/news/national-world/2021/01/08/police-found-a-pickup-truck-full-of-bombs-and-guns-near-capitol-feds-say/
FatherTed wrote: » I toured the Capitol building about 10 years ago and it’s not a building you just walk into. I had to sign up ahead of time and on the day of visit itself, had to go through many checkpoints, searches, metal detectors etc. Not one or two, it was a lot. Also they don’t allow tours when Congress is in session. The Capital police carry guns so why didn’t they use them before the crowd gained access to the building? Either they are complicit or badly neglected their duty, no matter how out numbered they were.
Itssoeasy wrote: » I know the defence of the trump crowd has been that they didn’t hurt anyone, which isn’t true because their actions directly or indirectly caused five people to die and many more were injured. I think it was this thread or the election thread where there was the picture of the guy with the cable ties(which apparently are used by police as handcuffs) and the “Murder the media” writing is seen on a video on an outside door with cable ties around the door handle. I mean if you weren’t trying to hurt anyone why would you be trying to cable tie doors shut ?
Carfacemandog wrote: » And why would you plant bombs at the rnc and DNC hq? And why would you have a dozen or so more bombs, us guns, in a truck nearby? And why would you attempt to crush and mace a cop? Haven't heard a peep about these from the 'blue lives matter' boards brigade either. And why would you bring tasers that you accidentally set off on your own balls to the point that you kill yourself? And on and on the list goes.
Brussels Sprout wrote: » https://twitter.com/NateSilver538/status/1347950669647532032 pretty decent argument for proceeding with Impeachment by Silver
Water John wrote: » Pelosi intends following through on the 2nd impeachment and rightly so. What he did was inexcusable. The GOP each will have to make a choice.
From Day One at the Trump White House, up has been down, yes has been no, failure has been success. Sean Spicer set the tone with the inauguration crowd size – the worst kind of whopper, as it demanded that people disbelieve their own eyes. The next day, Kellyanne Conway defended Spicer’s lie with a new term, “alternative facts.” Spicer’s successor, Sarah Huckabee Sanders lied at scale, from smearing those who accused Trump of sexual harassment to conjuring jobs statistics. Her successor, Stephanie Grisham, over the course of a year, never even held a press conference, though the BS continued unabated across friendly outlets. And finally, Kayleigh McEnany, Harvard Law graduate, a propaganda prodigy at 32 who makes smiling falsehood an art form
Let it be known to the business world: Hire any of Trump’s fellow fabulists above, and Forbes will assume that everything your company or firm talks about is a lie. We’re going to scrutinize, double-check, investigate with the same skepticism we’d approach a Trump tweet. Want to ensure the world’s biggest business media brand approaches you as a potential funnel of disinformation? Then hire away.
this standard needs to apply to liars from either party. It’s just a realization that, as Daniel Patrick Moynihan famously said, in a thriving democracy, everyone is entitled to their own opinions, but not their own facts. Our national reset starts there.
looksee wrote: » Also getting on the banned wagon - along with a whole lot of more likely sites, Pinterest and Pornhub... Pinterest?
jill_valentine wrote: » I wonder how much we're going to learn about the cause of Graham's loyalty in a few weeks time.
Spanish Eyes wrote: » There is not enough outrage about this coming from US. That is the problem. Doesn't matter what we think. Think about it and the effect on Trump. Not much really, just a waiting game until the 20th January, with talk about impeachment. Was an outrageous thing, totally unreal. But it seems to be glossed over in the hope that 20/1 will happen and Trump will be silenced. Somehow I doubt that.