hurlingman97 wrote: » It wasn't a proper ACCA tho It was a PP power price thing Atletico Real Barca all to win @5/2 I'll see I suppose
Loafing Oaf wrote: » Yeah, generally tHey void that part of the acca and run with whatever the cumulative odds were for the remaining legs
hurlingman97 wrote: » What happens with bets involving Atletico? Game postponed due to snow Treble becomes a double?
shmeee wrote: » Exactly, the draw was 20/1 so it's an error firstly on the market and the price. In fairness it could have been priced at a huge price if correct, basically a double of the game finishing a draw in normal time and then over 4.5 in ET so TBH a price of 250/1 wouldn't even have been crazy.
ShamoBuc wrote: » But not pre match, or in play a minute like the screenshot surely. The draw alone would have been a high price. Add 5 ET goals on top for 8/1 clear error really, normally after 90 mins and in play during ET for the extra time goals option.
ShamoBuc wrote: » But not pre match, or in play a minute like the screenshot surely. The draw alone would have been a high price. Add 5 ET goals on top for 8/1 clear error really
ianburke wrote: » Over 1.5 Goals 21/10 Extra Time Over/Under 1.5 Goals - Celtic v Hearts 14:15 20 December 2020 it's a totally different market to the usual overs market. that's why he got 8/1 for over 4.5 extra time goals when i was on over 7.5 goals at 9/2! that's a bet from the celtic cup game same type of market and can back before it goes to extra time a lot of the time
ianburke wrote: » it would have been a poor price yes. but there would have been bets for over 0.5, 1.5 etc. i bet his bet was only voided after the final whistle?
mailburner wrote: » No and I've been betting over 30 years,was sure the lads were reading it wrong It's a very bizarre bet, surely an error by pp
ShamoBuc wrote: » I'm not surprised it got voided, I've never seen that option as a bet before. Has anyone?
Joe_ Public wrote: » That 8/1 would have looked just a tad skinny if it all came down to e/t. More like 80/1 and still not sure that'd be value.
ianburke wrote: » if it went to extra time he'd have needed 5 goals in extra time for bet to be a winner. they often put up those markets in running and will void if no extra time is played
Joe_ Public wrote: » It looks like a computer glitch to me anyway. No way over 4.5 goals was 8/1 at kick off. Too good a price to be true usually means palpable error. It's hard luck to winners all the same. There's never any palpable error for a punter when he makes an honest error on his betting slip.
Irishphotodesk wrote: » bet made at 7.46pm - any chance it was refunded because it was after kick off ?
Basq wrote: »
bassy wrote: » there mistake not ours........