irishbucsfan wrote: » It was an unconstitutional referendum, so that’s why the result was so one sided. Same reason a Scottish independence referendum would absolutely need Westminster backing before it could legitimately go ahead. The last poll I saw the majority of people polled were against independence.
errlloyd wrote: » 3 cases of the South African variant detected here in Ireland. (Presumably, Munster are considering signing them)
Dubinusa wrote: » Just thinking about the covid. Would it be wrong to postpone all pro sports? Wouldn't player safety be the 1st priority?
The Inbetween is mine wrote: » Looks like Donald Trump's twitter is suspended again Actually... looks like a permanent suspension
Deleted User wrote: » He's now gotten 4 other people suspended trying to tweet from their accounts. Hilarious.
[Deleted User] wrote: » If he was in any way a good business man, he would have set up his own twitter years ago.
dregin wrote: » If parler doesn't work out, I'll be surprised if they don't just throw up a mastodon (https://joinmastodon.org/) instance.
[Deleted User] wrote: » There is no existing legal mechanism or precedent for Catalan to secede from Spain. The 2014 referendum provides an existing mechanism and precedent which makes Scotland's situation significantly different. There is division amongst constitutional lawyers as to whether Scotland could assert a legal right to hold a referendum through the courts but I suspect this is the initial route they will go if Westminster outright rejects whatever mandate emerges from the May elections.
Dubinusa wrote: » Looks like the Moderna vaccine will be available to my work soon. I suppose I should get it!
Dave_The_Sheep wrote: » All these brave companies coming out a week or two before Trump's losing of the presidency and banning/punishing him and his. So unique and brave of them to do it so late in the day. They wouldn't have said boo six months ago, even though if they give half the ****s they claim to, they'd have done it a few years back. Easy to stick the boot in now. Yes, I know it's just the way things are.
irishbucsfan wrote: » The Demecratic house whip is suggesting they bring impeachment proceedings to the Senate later this year. That’s an interesting idea, would mean a democratic senate would be able to vote to impeach Trump without his presence in the White House which maybe means they can convince a few extra republicans to vote with them. Still a very difficult task to get the votes they need.
sydthebeat wrote: » There's talk of removing the "seditious six" through the 14th amendment now, presumably through section 3 That would be delicious and a stark warning against any future similar actions
Deleted User wrote: » You would wonder what is keeping Pence from ousting Trump, given his wife and child had to go into a secret secure location with him with a noose sitting outside the building with his name on it.
Zzippy wrote: » He would need a majority of the cabinet to back the move. A lot of cabinet secretaries are acting, so its not clear if their vote would count, but most are Trump appointees following the sacking of previous secretaries and may have more loyalty to Trump. Regardless of the above, I don't think Pence has the balls anyway.
Deleted User wrote: » DeVose and Chao resigning immediately was very telling in this regards. I still think if Pence said that article 25 was appropriate and necessary then it pile pressure onto the cabinet. It might also force the Senate to convene and potentially convict. But as you said - he doesn't have the balls and with the rumours of Democrats withholding the articles of impeachment for a few months he may be happy to let the clock run out. I'd imagine Trump is pretty neutered at this stage. If he did anything particularly bad before January 20 it would be problematic for Republicans so I'd say his powers are limited and with no social media his voice is also largely muted. I do also wonder does Democratic leadership know what else is coming out in the coming months and think a delay will increase the likelihood of conviction!