FrancieBrady wrote: » Oh... there's figures on it? How many are shouting 'hoax' then? A few vocal FB idiots is all I see. But what 'sizable' is and how it excuses yet another chaotic mess of arrogance and wrongheaded thinking from the get go, will be interesting.
Bishop of hope wrote: » That's fair enough too. They're floundering in an attempt to keep some normals in a time when all needs shutting down. That's coalitions for you, cohesiveness is hard to achieve in short term decision making. Remember there's still a sizable amount of people shouting hoax.
FrancieBrady wrote: » It's worse....the u-turn has been made for them. Not in control.
Bishop of hope wrote: » Yep, disastrous decision for them to have made. They'll definitely have to uturn on it.
Cluedo Monopoly wrote: » I know. Complete disaster for Foley again. Another own goal. What were they thinking?
FrancieBrady wrote: » Open defiance from the ASTI now. A major PFO to the government. U-Turn imminent.
RandomViewer wrote: » So what happened between 1997 and 2011? FG couldn't even win an ugly politician competition
Finty Lemon wrote: » 15,000 vaccinated to date. Plans are afoot to vaccinate Leaving Cert students also
Brendan Bendar wrote: » Amazing all these lads seem to have all the answers and ideas when they have no responsibilities. As soon as they get responsibility they disappear from sight.
Bishop of hope wrote: » Fair enough. But political party's follow a certain ethos, FGs has remained fiscally Conservative throughout. People can change their point of view and that's fine, but that doesn't mean FG have changed much just people's opinion. So Bowie and Cluedo have changed if that's the case, believing the spin that the left and SF are espousing.
Bishop of hope wrote: » I don't believe either above posts, because none of what either of you post now was ever FG ethos, never.
Bubbaclaus wrote: » Looks like he hasn't done the math and realised 135k is the max we can fully vaccinate by end of February with the supply of Pfizer vaccine. We are supply constrained, he seems to think its capacity.
Bishop of hope wrote: » Thats it, what who presided over?
FrancieBrady wrote: » Does it matter? It's certainly not my fault or the fault of those who won't vote for them anymore. And not the thread for it, but I call bull**** on the claim that these two haven't changed. Of course they have, look at what they have presided over.
Bishop of hope wrote: » But it's you who's changed then Francie if that's, the case as with most voters. All that's changed politically is that SF are out FFing FF now, the crash caused most of that. FG haven changed so much or FF either. Just a new party of more of the same. No large shift left.
FrancieBrady wrote: » It's there in the voting stats Bish. The combined vote of FF and FG has fallen from a high of 85% to mid 40's. I am also one of those who lost faith.
Bishop of hope wrote: » Marc MacSharry very critical of the vaccine roll out and administration by our govt and claiming at current speed it will take 5 and a half years to roll it out.https://twitter.com/MarcMacsharryTD/status/1347094948919783424?s=20
The_Brood wrote: » I am yet to meet a single person in real life who admits to voting for FF. FG extremely rare too. Where black holes are all their voters coming from?