Tchaikovsky wrote: » The woman killed yesterday has been named as Ashli Babbitt, a 14-year veteran of the US air force. Seemed to have got sucked into the conspiracy hole that is Trumpism.
prawnsambo wrote: » QAnon actually. Not that there's much separating them. It's terribly sad. There was a chap came up on my Twitter feed who said he'd been sitting beside her on the plane up from California and (although at first he wasn't sure it was her, had it confirmed later) said she was to all intents and purposes a nice friendly woman who he chatted to for the duration of the flight. These people get sucked down a rabbit hole and unfortunately can't get back out. How it starts is anyone's guess. Just tragic.
Hurrache wrote: » All the computers in that place with easily accessible USB ports, it's a nightmare for the NSA.
Tell me how wrote: » There's plenty on Boards gone down the same rabbit hole and I have two friends in their 40's in Ireland who aren't too far behind them. In one of their cases it was conservative Christian commentators who aligned themselves with Trump because of his suppose Pro-Life views but they have gone full QAnon since then.
Parachutes wrote: » Both sides are as bad and as hypocritical as each other. Whether it's the burning down of entire neighbourhood's or breaking windows of the Capitol building. It doesn't matter whether it's Trump or Biden sitting on the throne, it doesn't matter as things are still going to push on relatively unchanged. Such is the paradigm of left/right politics. At the end of the day the little guy will still be getting screwed.
Parachutes wrote: » It doesn't work like that. All of those computers will work on a secure and encrypted intranet system. You can't just plug in a USB and get all the secrets....
rossie1977 wrote: » Yeah no. There was no Democrat leader out inciting violence so both sides are not the same.
prawnsambo wrote: » At the end of the day, the president of the USA incited a mob to try and overturn an election. He failed. But his place in infamy is secured.
Cheerful Spring2 wrote: » A massive crowd arrived in Washington to listen and hear Trump speak. However a notable large minority of Trump supporters broke off to cause trouble and they gave the democrat party a gift here. Due to this. There’s never going to be an analysis now to why 113,000 ballots in Fulton county Georgia on 4th had to be adjudicated after the computers failed to read them. Georgia state representatives have never actually provided an explanation to why the dominion scanners in Fulton county failed to read the ballots? It’s a significant number of ballots. This is not a conspiracy despite some on here will claim.. Richard Barron (Fulton county election director) announced that number, had to be manually reviewed on the 4th. 113,000 citizens not know how to mark a ballot accordingly for their candidate? it shocked me watching the session at Congress that not one of the Republicans brought this up. Republican Senators based the arguments around legal matters, with the courts in swing states changing election voting laws, and its legit point. The Republicans here decided to protect their own jobs, then learn the truth.
Leroy42 wrote: » So they were counted in the end?
Cheerful Spring2 wrote: » it shocked me watching the session at Congress that not one of the Republicans brought this up. Republican Senators based the arguments around legal matters, with the courts in swing states changing election voting laws, and its legit point. The Republicans here decided to protect their own jobs, then learn the truth.
In all, there were 126 counties within 10 votes of their original vote tally, according to the audit data. Of those counties, 54 counties matched their initial results exactly. No county had an error rate higher than 0.73% compared to their original results.
Timberrrrrrrr wrote: » This is not what happened and you know it! Trump whipped those idiots up and sent them.off to the capitol building, he encouraged them, he told them he would march with them and he sent four of them off to thier deaths. Those deaths are on his head, that womans blood is on his hands.
CIARAN_BOYLE wrote: » They were counted manually as the computers couldn't read them. Im not sure why this is an issue that could change the election in any way? Why would adjudicated results be different?
Hurrache wrote: » Are people who believe this in it for ****s and giggles, or have they really been brainwashed from reality?
Cheerful Spring2 wrote: » 113,000 ballots in not a modest number of votes. It’s outside all known modelling. This flagging occurred in just one county in Georgia. Not the entire state . Can you provide an official statement as to why so many votes got flagged by the computer? The reasons?
Cheerful Spring2 wrote: » Trump told them to go and storm the building? Can i get that quote here to read? Law enforcement had surrounded the building and with barrier protection. Trump wanted them to go there and protest outside. For him this was enough. You think differently that's fine.
prawnsambo wrote: » I've asked you to provide a citation for that number. I can't find it. The most I can find is 342. I'm asking you again. Ignore it again and I'll assume it's made up.
Cheerful Spring2 wrote: » Provide you the video to support my claim.https://www.c-span.org/video/?477819-1/fulton-county-georgia-election-update Richard Barron says about 140,000 ballots got counted by 7pm on the 4th ( Fulton county). From 113,000- 106,000 of those had adjudication (manual review) which literally means the computer could not read the paper ballot. So a person had to decide here who the voter wanted to give a preference to.
