ReeReeG wrote: » Mon 28th They've 'done up' i.e. tarmacadamed some of the canal walkway near Daingean in Offaly so I met a couple of friends to walk a bit of it. Nice spot, will have to head back for a run there I think. Went into the wind farm for a run on my way home, decided to venture off the parkrun route after looking at a sign showing the different routes. What the sign failed to show were the other roads I might come across... I spent at least 20 mins not really sure where the hell I was and not a sign of a single other person out there! My planned 5 miles turned into 8 (8.38/m) and I got a lovely head cold from being blown out of it under the turbines. Ah no harm done really.
crisco10 wrote: You do know that the turbines have nothing to do with creating the wind right? in fact, technically they slow the wind down.
Annie get your Run wrote: » I'd see no harm in doing a half marathon plan regardless of whether conn goes ahead or not, it'll be decent mileage and probably have lots of tempo, longer intervals? Or find a good base building plan and focus on improving aerobic fitness. Unfortunately I don't see any races happening this side of September but I could be wrong!
ariana` wrote: » It's tough going without races. Hard to see Conn going ahead, it's too early in the year. You could target a fast HM in Charleville in Sept In the meantime maybe a base plan or the Grads 10k-HM plan. That's a nice plan with lots of variety. Or how do you feel about the 10k now, unfinished business perhaps? You could set a date 10-12 weeks out from now for a TT. Restrictions permitting maybe you could drum up interest from a few other runners from here to do it with you.
ReeReeG wrote: » I did the Grads half plan this time last year actually, it is great alright and did me well. I definitely feel like there is much unfinished business with the 10k. The problem is every distance looks tempting right now (which is probably a good sign in terms of motivation), it's just so hard to choose with no definite targets.What are YOU going to do for the late winter / spring?? :pac:
ReeReeG wrote: » I did the Grads half plan this time last year actually, it is great alright and did me well. I definitely feel like there is much unfinished business with the 10k. The problem is every distance looks tempting right now (which is probably a good sign in terms of motivation), it's just so hard to choose with no definite targets. What are YOU going to do for the late winter / spring?? :pac:
Swashbuckler wrote: » Poop...... Now that I've dragged down the tone as promised...... It's a tricky time with no races and given I'm only catching up on your log I'm not sure how you feel about TT's. If you're a fan then a proper race specific block wouldn't do any harm. As you may/may not know I spent most of 2020 base building. That's not to say I didn't have big chunky sessions. I did but there was very little race specific stuff that you'd normally see in a 'plan from a book'. I came on massively. That being said it was a coached base building block and for sure I wouldn't have been able to pluck that plan from a book or online. Base building as I've seen in books/online is very different to what I experienced last year. I almost wouldn't have known I was base building other than I was told! Lol. What am I trying to say. I think there's huge benefit in base building in the absense of any meaningful races but you'll benefit less from just plucking another base plan from Daniels and just rerunning it. It depends what motivated you? Is it the training or is it the target? If you're OK with TT and you're motivated by an end goal then I'd always lean towards 10k (personal preference). HM and M training is a little more draining on the body especially in lockdown and might be hard to keep motivated knowing you only have a TT at the end. 10k has nice sharp sessions to keep things interesting and provides a good base to move down or up in distance after. It's a nice midpoint. But I'm biased as we all know at this stage. Poop........ Awful low tone in this log......
ariana` wrote: » Would you not say this about 10 mile? It seems a million miles from 10k to Marathon or even HM, even in how you approach a 10k race, strategy etc. whereas 10 mile training gives a strong foundation to go up or down from and still without draining the body and mind as a HM or M would (I still can't believe how many people ran marathon TTs last year and did so well in them too, it's mind blowing!). Sorry for the hijack V
ReeReeG wrote: » And now, 2021. I would like someone to just tell me what to do :rolleyes: I don't really know what to focus on. I had signed up for Connemara half but as the days go by, it hardly seems likely to go ahead. So I dunno. If anyone would like to give me suggestions, I'd like that a lot !!!
ReeReeG wrote: » No worries - it's a good question! I'd put a 10 mile as much the same thing as a HM in my head interestingly...
Swashbuckler wrote: » Yep definitely. I wouldn't really differentiate much between 10k and 10M training to be honest. As you move up in distance the emphasis shifts more towards the longer, harder sessions (high end aerobic and threshold but high volume). Some of those sessions you'd see healy and AMK running for Marathon training are frightening. I don't think the gap from 10k to HM is as big as you think. Just a slight shift in emphasis. Same working down from 10k to 5k. That's why I see it as a nice midpoint. Well trained 10k runners have a really good base for HM and M training. 10M training and 10k training are very similar (in my opinion). Maybe your just getting a slightly better base off the 10M if plan is to move up in distance after.
The Black Oil wrote: » 'Process, not outcome' is how Ben Parkes put it in one of his recent videos. Mind you, he's aiming for 4,000 miles this year. But yeah, he's right and you'd understand this mindset too, both theory and practice.
ReeReeG wrote: » Haven't watched that lad before.. does he not feel like a bit of a tool getting his mate to film him running in busy London :pac: But yes, he is not wrong about process
ariana` wrote: » Yeah interesting. I see 10k as being a bit like 5k, uncomfortable pace from the start. But i've yet to run a 10k race that i'm happy with so maybe i'm doing it wrong. 10m is more like HM, in that the pace is quite comfortable in the early miles and it's the distance that makes it start to hurt. But i haven't done one of these in almost 2 years so maybe i'm doing these wrong too :pac: The difference for me between 10m and HM is two-fold, 1 fuelling isn't an issue on 10m whereas HM (at my pace) probably need to factor it in. And secondly those last 3 miles! Not much I know but the longer training runs bring me into a zone where I take a bit longer to recover and have a bit less enjoyment! I love long runs up to 12 miles and don't mind the occasional 14m thrown in to the peak weeks, perfect for 10m. Once I'm up around 14+ mile week in week out I need significantly more recovery and sleep etc.
ReeReeG wrote: » I'd headed to UCD to use the trails but had to change my plan after some a$$hole ignored my polite request that he put his very boundy dog on a lead.
Bungy Girl wrote: I hear ya! It's got to the stage now where I don't even ask, I just avoid, because it gets me so wound up it's not worth it. I've heard it all : 'He's just a puppy' (he's the size of Digby!), 'He's just playing' (he's slobbering over my leggings?) etc. There's a lot of new owners out there at the minute who don't have a clue
Bungy Girl wrote: » I hear ya! It's got to the stage now where I don't even ask, I just avoid, because it gets me so wound up it's not worth it. I've heard it all : 'He's just a puppy' (he's the size of Digby!), 'He's just playing' (he's slobbering over my leggings?) etc. There's a lot of new owners out there at the minute who don't have a clue
ReeReeG wrote: » There are so many more dogs in the last 10 months or whatever its been. Most owners are grand and do use leads or get the dog onto one very quickly when I ask, but there's always the odd inconsiderate dope around sadly. They just don't comprehend that not everyone is OK with four legged creatures. Someday I'll tackle the problem from my side..
ReeReeG wrote: » Going to add back in some faster stuff this week now, probably with a mind to starting some 10k stuff next week..?
Murph_D wrote: That's some change of pace between the first and second half of the Fri session alright. How are you getting your paces for these - VDOT values based on recent race/TT times? I know you're feeling your way into it, but I think it's really important to nail down the target times for this kind of stuff. 41 to 50 secs is quite the range.
Murph_D wrote: Are there many cars on the old UCD track at the moment? Last time I was over there there was probably enough of it available to do 200s. I think it's good to do these reps on the same piece of ground for accurate comparison. 200s are just too short to be accurately measured by the watch (which might account for some of the range).