Marcet wrote: » Hi, I'm struggling alot recently with my father-in-law. He's a difficult man to deal with. Liable to blow his temper at anything. Everyone has to walk on eggshells around him. The problem is, I've gone along with this for too long, and his behaviour now is essentially death by a thousand cuts. I have three kids of my own and simply have no patience left for dealing with a fourth. I have alot of anger towards him, that I've been bottling up and I can feel it having a huge negative effect on me. For a start, not sleeping, being irritable with my wife, constantly on edge. I'm not sure how to handle him. My preference is to simply not have anything to do with him, but it's quite difficult, as he lives close to us. He's extremely passive aggressive, although when challenged on anything (and I mean, anything), he becomes flat out aggressive and rage-filled. He's quite terrifying to be honest...feel a bit embarressed to admit that. In my eyes, he's an abusive bully who's gotten away with treaing his family like dirt for years. I think my anger towards him has gotten more intsense over the years because I now have kids of my own, and I really don't want them exposed to that type of behaviour, or more specifically, I don't want them seeing that type of behaviour being rewarded. Anyway, I just wanted to vent a bit and get this out of my head. I've spoken to my wife about it and she's very supportive, but we're both struggling with how best to deal with him. Regards, Marcet.
Marcet wrote: » <Snip> Unnecessary quoting of entire text.
Princess Calla wrote: » <Snip> No need to quote the entire preceeding post.
Marcet wrote: » <Snip> No need to quote the entire preceeding post.
Princess Calla wrote: » Yeah but you've just told a grandmother that she won't be seeing her grandchildren because of the actions of her husband, a man who she's married to for decades and had her children with (For the next month they shouldn't have been seeing them anyway, so having that conversation at the moment was unnecessary)
Sunrise_Sunset wrote: » Did I miss something? He didn't say anything about her not seeing her grandchildren. And he also didn't say that his wife is going to pull back, only him.
Princess Calla wrote: » Sorry your right, he just said he explained to his mother in law why he was being less available. I read it as "they" as in the full family unit, where as he's talking just about himself. (I think) I still find it weird he needed to do that especially right now when everyone is being asked to "make themselves less available" , it's just bringing unnecessary drama.