Wearb wrote: » OP is correct to be worried. It has been shown that drilling isn't enough and that it needs to be removed. They will warp and twist, sometimes with disastrous consequences.
blackvalley wrote: » :eek: Like what ?.
Dtp1979 wrote: » If it’s full of water and blanked off it will explode, killing everyone within 10 metres. If it isn’t full of water and then eventually the steel will be burnt through and carbon monoxide will enter the room from the holes where the pipes used to be. Either way, do not light a decommissioned back boiler.
Wearb wrote: » In one instance that I remember, it warped enough to knock the firefront down on top of a child.
CoBo55 wrote: » Oh god that's shocking... Was it on Joe Duffy? Being a child an all.
Wearb wrote: » I can't remember if it was. I don't hear daytime radio very often.
CoBo55 wrote: » Really? that's terrible. Kind of a bit late for the op to be hearing that now.
Dtp1979 wrote: » He’s mocking ya wearb
bladespin wrote: » Same boat, we have a working firebird BB in the house at the moment, plan to upgrade the system to gas very soon but really want to keep the fire for use the odd time starting to wonder what the best option is all round, reading this has opened my eyes.
Wearb wrote: » Best option would be to put in a stove. Worst option would be to put a fireback in it's place, as this would leave an open flue to draw the heat out the chimney.
bladespin wrote: » I'd like the stove but the mrs hates them, thinking maybe gas fire for the effect.
frankled wrote: » We have a working back-boiler that's still connected to the closed gas system- so lighting the fire is out of the question. Spoke to two plumbers- it seems the approach of disconnecting back-boilers and drilling holes to make them safe isn't really done as much these days for risk of the boiler itself warping/steaming/making noise. To remove the BB entirely would've necessitated the destruction of the existing fireplace, which we like. Spoke to a stove company who don't deal with back-boilers and informed us that to put in one of their stoves they'd also have to destroy the BB. So we have a chimney balloon in the fireplace now, and a candle or two where a grate would normally be.
Dtp1979 wrote: » As sound as you may think the gas installers were, it was very irresponsible of them to leave a back boiler attached to a closed system. System like that have to be left stupid proof. What if you sell the house and the next folk come in and light the fire
BrownFinger wrote: » would it not also act in reverse and become a radiator ? Pumping heat up the chimney .
frankled wrote: » As it happens the original gas installers were not sound at all! Had issues with them. Was a lot less informed back them as I am now. Is there a way to make a fully functional back boiler work safely with a gas sealed system, do you know? Heard something about expansion vessels but haven't looked into it.
CoBo55 wrote: Oh god that's shocking... Was it on Joe Duffy? Being a child an all.
Dtp1979 wrote: » What gas boiler do you have?