Thelonious Monk wrote: » I think this is great news. Some of the things that were revealed by wikileaks needed to be seen. Massacring Iraqi civilians in cold blood. It's great news forthe freedom of the press and I'm glad someone stood up to the US murderous bullieshttps://www.theguardian.com/media/2021/jan/04/julian-assange-cannot-be-extradited-to-us-british-judge-rules
Deleted User wrote: » They say it's because of his mental health. Do you think he'd rather have his full mental capacity and be extradited or instead be mentally limited and not be extradited?
Thelonious Monk wrote: » I think most people would rather anything over being extradited to the US. No doubt the yanks will appeal this they wont let it go.
Deleted User wrote: » So you would personally rather have serious health issues than be extradited to the US?
Thelonious Monk wrote: » It's great news forthe freedom of the press and I'm glad someone stood up to the US murderous bullies[/url]
Thelonious Monk wrote: » Yes!
Deleted User wrote: » It would be great news for the freedom of the press if he was extradited and not charged. The fact that he is not being extradited on health grounds has no impact on the freedom of the press (in my opinion).
Deleted User wrote: » So you would have rather have any kind of health issue ranging from mild to severe instead of being extradited for a crime you may be found innocent of or not charged with?
Donald Trump wrote: » I'm not a psychologist. But I'd imagine that getting locked up in the US wouldn't be too good for the oul' mental health anyway even if you went over 100% grand
Thelonious Monk wrote: » I think most people would rather anything over being extradited to the US.
seamus wrote: » Extradited to the US specifically.
Deleted User wrote: » Again though, I was replying to Thelonious Monk's statement where he said he would rather be mentally imbalanced than be extradited to the US, regardless of how small the crime is. I just cannot understand that logic (personally).
Thelonious Monk wrote: » Jesus let it go
Deleted User wrote: » I will once you explain your logic? You would really rather have any kind of health issue, even the severe kind, than be extradited to the US for any kind of crime, even petty ones? Do you not see how bizarre that statement you made is?
carq wrote: » a few conjugal visits from Pamela Anderson would do wonders for anyone's Mental health.
Thelonious Monk wrote: » They extradite people for petty crimes? I skipped a court date while I was on my J1 for drinking in public, I haven't heard anything from them since.
Deleted User wrote: » There have been many instances of people being extradited for aggravated assault due to a small bar fight. Do you think such people would rather have severe health concerns than be sent to the US for trial?
Deleted User wrote: » A quick Google will tell you the answer to that is yes. :rolleyes: There have been many instances of people being extradited for aggravated assault due to a small bar fight. Do you think such people would rather have severe health concerns than be sent to the US for trial? If so, it's one of the most bizarre opinions I've heard on Boards in many years.
Thelonious Monk wrote: » Ok well I'm glad I've given you something to think about today
seamus wrote: » I'm not gonna lie to you; it's a toss-up. Considering that you could be in prison for weeks or months awaiting trial in the U.S. even for minor crimes, many people find themselves acquitted but their lives ruined anyway. If it was a choice between that or having a health condition which could (and would) be treated and managed long-term...then I'm not sure what I would pick. If you didn't have a mental health issue going into the US justice system, you'd sure as hell have one by the time you came out.
Deleted User wrote: » So you're not going to answer the question then?
[Deleted User] wrote: » So you would have rather have any kind of health issue ranging from mild to severe instead of being extradited for a crime you may be found innocent of or not charged with?