nomdeboardie wrote: » Thanks, though that seems to refer only to the harbour areas proper, which are all 7 days/week anyway
nomdeboardie wrote: » My preference would be to sacrifice that small amount of income on days when most usage is just recreational to give us a small reprieve from the miserableness :pac: of having to feed meters and stress about return times for a quick walk/run in the vicinity. And yes, I should/will probably make this known to the councillors, as Labre34 suggested
Larbre34 wrote: » I guess thats one point of view. Another is that with half the Country on salary life support, its anti-social and anti-Community. The parking regime in DLR County was originally brought in to tackle commuter parking clogging up business and residential areas, often dangerously. This meant the hours of operation were matched to the hours of incoming commuter demand, 8am-7pm, Monday to Friday in most places, Monday to Saturday in busier shopping towns to keep spaces turning over. It seems to me, if the parking regime is now being increasingly used only to raise revenue, that it has exceeded its original raison d'etre, and the local authority and its members need to be asked to justify where traffic management ends and interference in ordinary social and community life begins. Just my opinion.
ted1 wrote: » Nope. They are the council parking bye laws for the area. You need to look at appendix 1. Which is the areas outside the harbour
ted1 wrote: » Use the app. It’s cheaper, removes the need to feed the meter or stress/worry about return times as you can top it it from anywhere
nomdeboardie wrote: » The "Parking Tag" pay-by-call/text (not an app as such)? I suppose that would help if you can pay extra remotely if you're running over (or running too slow!), but still a pain, and requires bringing a phone on the person
Blut2 wrote: » You're talking as if the car parking spaces have been destroyed. They haven't, they're now just pay & display for a few extra hours a week. If the demand is there that people will pay to park then its a great decision. More badly needed funding for works in the local area.
AndrewJRenko wrote: » Why would the more privileged visitors to the area be entitled to free storage space for their private property?
Tea drinker wrote: » BTW there are a lot of car spaces destroyed, at the 40ft, at various lay by along the seafront, and all along killiney hill.
Cyrus wrote: » Genuine qn what car park spaces are gone on Killiney hill ?
Cyrus wrote: » Anyone putting coins in a meter in this day and age needs to get with it the app takes seconds it’s absolutely not a pain and the vast vast majority of people always have their phone on them . Put it this way I’m about 100 times more likely to have my phone than a 2 euro coin . And it is an app, a decent one as it goes.
nomdeboardie wrote: » ? Appendix I doesn't mention bank holidays. The only mention I can find is in Appendix II (harbour)
ted1 wrote: » It is very much an app , used by many other councils such as Dublin City. It you don’t carry a phone you are very much in the minority, abs that reflects on you and not in the councilhttps://apps.apple.com/ie/app/parking-tag/id716673381https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.payzone.parkingtag&hl=en_GB
Tea drinker wrote: » All the spaces on the Vico road. Doesn't help especially with the lockdown the main car park is thronged down to the road on busy days.
ted1 wrote: » Appendix 1 details the parking in the borough Appendix 2 details specifics which relate the the harbour. The bye laws cover the areas in the whole borough
nomdeboardie wrote: » Re having phone on me: In car (while parking) sure, but I don't necessarily always want to have to carry it in my hand /jiggling in a pocket /strapped to me while running (to take advantage of the ability to top up parking if going to be late back, assuming I've remembered to set an alarm...groan )
nomdeboardie wrote: » I still don't see how that would convey that the statement about bank holidays covers the whole borough if it is located only in Appendix I
nomdeboardie wrote: » Ah, I’ve found it on the Google Play Store now – DLR website didn’t make it clear there was an actual app to (presumably) do the equivalent of send the info by text. That’s good, though the reviews (for what they’re worth – I know the motivation to post problems is much greater than praise) are impressively negative. Also someone flags the following interesting (if true) consideration “Allows you car to be identified as soon as your time is up and so clampers can cherry pick your car for clamping...” Also apparently a monthly fee, and automatically tops itself from your bank etc. Re having phone on me: In car (while parking) sure, but I don't necessarily always want to have to carry it in my hand /jiggling in a pocket /strapped to me while running (to take advantage of the ability to top up parking if going to be late back, assuming I've remembered to set an alarm...groan )
ted1 wrote: » Did you rad the doc? Main body contains the laws including the bank holidays Appendix 1 details the charges, zones that the main body relates to. Appendix 2 fire the same but is specific to the harbour
nomdeboardie wrote: » Exactly, Appendix II (sorry - I initially shot mself in the foot by writing I in my last post, then did a ninja edit but not fast enough for your reply!) is specific to the harbour, and it is ONLY there that the bank holiday statement appears.
ted1 wrote: » Didn’t spot that. That means that there is no free parking at bank holidays in the harbour as opposed to the rest. If the county. My take on that is that the harbour police enforce the parking in the harbour and work 365. But that a private contractor look after the rest and dint want to pay staff the bank holiday rate, so there’s no one to enforce parking laws
Marcusm wrote: » Unfortunately, human behaviour is such that the same small number of cars would park for the entire time. By all means advocate for a reduced charge but even a minimum charge like 50c deters all day parking thereby freeing up space.