blanch152 wrote: » I don’t think your posts on this issue can be taken seriously. Holohan is a disgrace. A racist sexist homophobe, as demonstrated by his utterances, well suited to Sinn Fein.
Bowie wrote: » You are shown to be a complete hypocrite on this. He said he preferred a family man who raised kids. Thats homophobic to you. But a man arguing that gay people shouldn't be allowed raise children, that a man and woman is the natural way isn't? As I say I don’t think either are, less so Holohan IMO. He may be but not based on that interview he isn't.
a very cool kid wrote: » Mary Lou very quiet on the Garda incident yesterday.....
McMurphy wrote: » What do you think she should be saying? Politicians should rightly be keeping the fcuk out of it - too easy for anyone to jump on their comments and try and assign a "side" to them on it. If McDonald makes a statement either people will be claiming she is anti AGS and what about the shop worker etc etc, or she's anti black/immigrant etc etc. I know some of you would love to stir that cauldron, but thankfully common sense has prevailed there. Btw, I'm of the firm belief that colour/race is irrelevant when it comes to brandishing and threatening people with a feckin knife.
Brendan Bendar wrote: » As I posted previously,Randal, the reason she and any other SF dude or dudess will not be heard is that this is not an open goal. Nothing to gain politically, you see;) Shinners will from the lowliest councilor to the highest Army Councillor will stay away from this like the plague. If there is a comment it will be more ambivalent than ambivalence itself.
McMurphy wrote: » Your prayers have been answered so.
McMurphy wrote: » What you talking about, Paul Donnelly (TD for the area) has already made a statement about it FFS. Bit of research before engaging the gears of the brain fart dispenser perhaps Brenner?
FrancieBrady wrote: » Talking himself into yet another cul de sac.
Brendan Bendar wrote: » Heh he ...knew you guys would rise to trying to getting a cut at the Bren. If you read back through the posts you will see I referred to the guy earlier. However you bhoys didn’t read the last line, and as I have always reminded you, the Bren rarely writes owt without it having a meaning Best read it again lads ............. and weep:D And put on the safety catch on your keyboards.
FrancieBrady wrote: » Take the safety catch off your dictionary maybe Brendi? Why you bother with these fruitless declarations one will never understand. But have at it.
you wrote: the reason she and any other SF dude or dudess will not be heard is that this is not an open goal. Nothing to gain politically, you see Shinners will from the lowliest councilor to the highest Army Councillor will stay away from this like the plague.
McMurphy wrote: » Ok, sorry and pardon me, because obviously I thought when you posted - You were saying no-one from Sinn Fein, from the lowest councillor, to the highest army councillor will not be heard is because their was no open goal for them, and theyd have nothing to gain from it. Now when I point out that the TD from the very area the lad was killed in, had made a fairly straight and concise statement, basically stating that your man tried to attack the guards with a big feck off knife, and was deservedly taken out for doing so, and appealed for anyone with info to contact the guards - you obviously, and in hindsight meant something completely different altogether. Get up that yard Brenner. Lol.
Brendan Bendar wrote: » If there is a comment it will be more ambivalent than ambivalence itself.
blanch152 wrote: » You could certainly win a prize for silliest post of the year with that one. Here is what he said, and you walked right into it.
FrancieBrady wrote: » Yes blanch we know he said that. In your rush to defend him you failed to see there was no ambivalence (conflict) in what the representative said. Brendi was trying to cover his ass but failed..spectacularly. Well done you, weighing in to defend...cute.
Brendan Bendar wrote: » “Was deservedly taken out” Where did he say that Randall? I didn’t see that anywhere in the statement. We’ll start there Randall, me auld flower
Brendan Bendar wrote: » https://www.wineverygame.com/words/ambivalent.html Some light reading Mr F...
McMurphy wrote: » The statement that no-one from the Shinners, be they the lowest councillor, or the highest army blah blah would definitely not be making lol? But now it's been brought to your attention that a very clear and concise statement was actually made, by Blanch's local TD you think I want to arse box over the contents of his statement. Btw, he didn't literally say that, but it's there if you read between the lines. Sorry Brenner, this isn't going your way I'm afraid. Read my signature horse.
FrancieBrady wrote: » So what was his statement conflicting with? Your view of a Shinner? No good Brendi, you gogt caught, hands up and admit it.
Brendan Bendar wrote: » So you didn’t bother with the link Francesco.... fair enough.
FrancieBrady wrote: » The Brendi isn't convincing anyone. He threw in a sentence hoping it would cover him, dug the hole and called in air support from blanch.
Brendan Bendar wrote: » Heheh heheheh........you heard me.
McMurphy wrote: » Hehehe's not gonna save you bren, have you outlined What was "ambivalent" about Donnelly's statement yet, (a statement that no-one from the Shinners would make, from the lowest councillor etc etc)? I repeat, it was very clear and concise.
Brendan Bendar wrote: » Lads, this is not a kindergarten, try and think for yourselves. It would appear that I am dealing with ....well...... let’s say, less articulate posters here. All laid out for yez.
bobbysands81 wrote: » ...and there’s the supremacist attitude that gets you and your ilk in trouble all the time.
Brendan Bendar wrote: » What did Bobby say in ‘Deliverance’. “We got a live one here”. And in keeping with previous posts the ‘Bobby’ is not Mr Sands. Seems I have to explain everything now...
