Patrick WW wrote: » Throw away vote then. Aimless vote.
KathleenGrant wrote: » I do.
Gertrude WW wrote: » Probably the hairy arms.
KathleenGrant wrote: » Ok i have caught up. Patrick claims i visited Necro. People want to know A if i did B if i did, why
Eva WW wrote: » Did that action involve Necro at any point?
Patrick WW wrote: So its a baseless claim. Thanks.
y0ssar1an22 wrote: » thats the thing..no vote is aimless. let people vote for who they wish. by all means call them out if you think there is an agenda. but to say its silly...what does that achieve?
Patrick WW wrote: » No, Im claiming to have tracked you on Monday night, Tuesday morning.... you visited Necro. You can back up my claim that Conor is bad. I tracked him and he attacked Brendan. Did you visit Necro on Monday night Tuesday morning?
Patrick WW wrote: » Its an aimless vote. Stop being so sensitive. Liz didnt catch up and has provided no basis as to why she thinks people are wolves. Its a wreckless vote.
y0ssar1an22 wrote: maybe not why
Necro wrote: » So if a role can perform an action like peek, shoot, roleblock etc then you would have to 'visit' your target to perform an action. A tracker (like Patrick is claiming) is able to follow a person and learn who, if anyone they visited (or performed an action on) the previous night
Baggly wrote: » Jesus will you chill out with the sark
y0ssar1an22 wrote: » how is it reckless. its a 2 horse race. 1 outlier makes no difference
Gertrude WW wrote: » Well, thanks for using my proper name! Long day, two phones, and I actually asked for an anon account when I subbed because otherwise Necro would shoot me on sight. The good thing about joining a game late is the objective reading of posts. You're a wolf. Sorry, but you should be shot.
KathleenGrant wrote: » Ok i "visited" Necro. I must say 3 things. Necro has MASSIVE dangly bits. His choice in music is AWFUL. My intentions in visiting him were good for the village. I am not saying it was good for the village because i don't know but my intentions were meant for the good.
JP Liz V1 wrote: » You want me to vote Conor as you think and proved he is a wolf, does others feel the same?
Gertrude WW wrote: » Good dangly bits, or bad dangly bits?
JP Liz V1 wrote: » So Kathleen is Patrick correct?
Eva WW wrote: » Just to be clear. I think Conor is a wolf but I also think Patrick is a wolf.
Patrick WW wrote: » Youd be wrong. Again, to be clear.
KathleenGrant wrote: » Really good dangly bits Nothing to do with the game. Just acting the maggot.
KathleenGrant wrote: I am absolutely not Patrick
Gertrude WW wrote: Anyway - Patrick is evil.
Baggly wrote: » I think we need the why. Getting down to brass tacks so we need the info to determine if she is wolfy or not imo