Necro wrote: » I feel stupid mentioning it on thread tbh. One of those silly brainfart moments.
Katie WW wrote: » What’s this about??
Necro wrote: » I literally said out loud that I thought Brendan was a JOAT
Katie WW wrote: » Your tenses are wrong though
Conor WW wrote: » Morning folks Struggling with something from last night. Orla isn’t evil based on her voting strategy, but she flips as a non- village team (I don’t actually know what neutral team means- good/bad/ in the middle). In a tight vote I don’t get her strategy. Anyone got any thoughts on why she’d play that way when self pres is an option and she’s a powerful role?
Conor WW wrote: » What are everyone’s thoughts to on the second team. Does it rule out an SK? Ellis is mentioned in the op but nothing there to indicate a second team. What sort of split makes sense in a17 player game with potentially two teams and an SK. 3/3/1 maybe?
Conor WW wrote: » Eva’s ffa was basically a pile of poo with lots of holes. That’s my issue with it. Her votes aren’t consistent with that in a tight race though, hence my confusion. It’s not helped by orlas flip since her vote looks village too What is your read on Eva?
Conor WW wrote: » Serial killer- a one person team
Angus WW wrote: » I dont buy both Eva and Orla having a shot, Eva survived and then has been in hiding since relatively speaking. I think they were both on the same time trying to avoid the lynch hence the lack of switching
Eva WW wrote: » Imagine a day 1 FFA being crap...at least I did one. You won't have to worry about me too much longer though as I put in a shot on you and I imagine team evil have a target on me too.
Angus WW wrote: » *same team
Conor WW wrote: » Not just crap, inconsistent as fook
Angus WW wrote: » True, but both won't have a shot on N1 which was what was indicated by Eva last night. We know now Orla wasn't lying even if she wasn't village
Angus WW wrote: » Cool, did you not want any thoughts on who you should shoot today? Given you'd already somewhat revealed you have a bullet, did you not think to ask for some village concensus? Or at least input?
Eva WW wrote: » How inconsistent? You were on it, I voted for you. Here's the thing, generally the only people who can be certain are evil because they know who is good. Not sure how that works in this game with factions but evils usually work as a team so they know more.
Conor WW wrote: » If we’ve a vig they have to be on you, which means I’m dead if you really have a shot. Not a great move for village since I’m village tbh
Conor WW wrote: » Vig should be bg
Conor WW wrote: » Inconsistent as in calls out Necro orla but no Necro on the ffa A pile of poo
Eva WW wrote: » Jesus Christ. Now I wish I was dead. You get that there are more than 3 baddies right? Where was yours?
Eva WW wrote: » Giving you the benefit of the doubt that you didn't read my many explanations. ORLAs interactions with Necro felt forced...as in contrived/desperate/scrambling. When combined with her Angus vote she was on my FFA. I also thought Katie may be evil (though less so now as she moved her vote) but I didn't include her because while suspicious she is more helpful than the 3 who made my list. Where was your FFA? Why am I constantly having to defend mine when so many didn't even do one?
Conor WW wrote: » Hang on there, how many baddies are there. I was trying to work this out based on having a neutral team this morning so if you know maybe you’d share? Also, what’s the story with your shot?
Eva WW wrote: » I am counting neutrals as baddies...ie not team village. We know there were 2 now, and I'm going to guess that there are 3 wolves. Either someone protected you or roleblocked me. I'd guess that it's a roleblock based on lack of BG flavour. If you really are village then that's a good thing.
Necro wrote: Someone idiot check me please
Katie WW wrote: » Why are you ignoring this Necro? Your tenses are wrong on the first post for your explanation. You’re speaking in the present tense when you should be speaking in the past tense. Either I felt stupid or I feel stupid for having mentioned it It feels like something from a BR
Eva WW wrote: » I really should have tried to shoot Conor again.
JP Liz V1 wrote: » Did you take a shot today Eva yet, if so on who or was it blocked?
Baggly wrote: » You are an idiot but I do agree with the analysis.
Necro wrote: » Because it's nothing, I've already explained it
Katie WW wrote: » I don’t agree with that, based on Angus’s posts Frank was the most wolfy left, it was the right call
Baggly wrote: » You are missing the point. They may not have been able to change the extra vote in the scenario I outlined.
Katie WW wrote: » You’ve given an explanation Explain why you’re speaking in the wrong tense
KathleenGrant wrote: » Ok some questions. What does "flips" means as in if someone "flips wolf"? What is this ISO that people mentioned? If wolves vote at 6 is that somewhere else or on the lynching thread? Because surely if they only vote after 6 people would see that.
Katie WW wrote: Then why use it? Or who did it benefit?
Baggly wrote: » He could be. Peek wasn't a lie but there is precedence from other games where peeks on alpha return a false positive result. All I'm saying is don't assume he is home dry good. Until we get conclusive proof keep questioning him.
Baggly wrote: » I don't know Katie tbh. It could have been a punt or an educated guess. It might not have been a wolf. It could be a RV as well. I'm just speculating based on mechanics I've seen before.
Katie WW wrote: It’s the motive that I’m struggling with
Katie WW wrote: What do you think of Necro using the wrong tense this morning?
Katie WW wrote: » Conor - agreed with my now (DEFINITELY) wrong assessment of Eva D1, I obviously liked that
Katie WW wrote: » FWIW I’m more than happy to lynch Patrick. I said it yesterday loads of Qs and no As. Said he’d explain his Kathleen vote and didn’t Conor - agreed with my now (probably) wrong assessment of Eva D1, I obviously liked that@necro when I did the ISO of Angus yesterday I identified Frank as most likely wolf buddy and I had Baggly second, you disagreed, why? After him was Fixxer and JP I think
Necro wrote: » I think Baggly's reaction to being suspected has been very consistent. Look at when Angus FFAs him: Then a comparison to when I FFA him: And finally when others start mentioning him. Fairly consistent throughout, more outraged at the fact he could be suspected, I see it as villagery tbh. He didn't hide from Angus FFAing him either.
Baggly wrote: » I think Conor is our best bet for the lynch as things stand. I'd like to hear from him first though.
Necro wrote: » I'd agree with that Baggly. I'd also like to hear from fixXxer but alas that doesn't seem to be happening
JP Liz V1 wrote: » An agreement from you too :eek: At present I'm on Baggly or Patrick WW for lynch tonight
Eva WW wrote: » yosser, you mentioned that you brought up Angus as a peeked wolf before I did... can you point me to that post please?
Necro wrote: » Who else would you be looking at so if we leave Eva and Brendan alone for now
y0ssar1an22 wrote: » would emily of had a peek yesterday? yourself, baggly, katie off the top of my head
Eva WW wrote: » It's too early for me to have a definite FFA. Frank and Conor stay on my list. Frank's neat posts and feck all since has him top of it. Katie has moved down my list. Baggly's fixation with you is suspicious but he isn't the only one who is latching onto one and running with it. Angus is one I'll be looking at. Emily had a Night 0 peek and chose him to vote for when she was rattling cages.
Necro wrote: » See below, went into detail this morning. Take a read back through the last two pages about Conor and Patrick and see what you think too
Katie WW wrote: » I agreed with your reading on his consistency That doesn't mean that you should ignore the evidence from Angus's ISO This is going to sound paranoid but I've found loads of time in this game where either you or Baggly or both just dismiss stuff. Especially this morning - the extra vote, its like you're both determined to just ignore it when I'd expect ye both to be all over it. Above you're using deflection tactics to ignore something. You said D1 that I know you wouldn't bus but I'm pretty sure in your head you could frame this as Baggly bussing you. And I know from bitter experience that Baggly has no boundaries. Why do I feel like the two of you are playing?
Necro wrote: » I can only speak for myself but I'm not trying to play you, I'm just a villager trying to figure things out myself. I haven't dismissed the extra vote, I provided a possible alternative theory for it, Orla's No Vote not counting. Problem is both of our suggestions are pure speculation unfortunately, I'd love to know how I ended up in the mix tbh
