Baggly wrote: » You are missing the point. They may not have been able to change the extra vote in the scenario I outlined.
Katie WW wrote: » I don’t agree with that, based on Angus’s posts Frank was the most wolfy left, it was the right call
Necro wrote: » Because it's nothing, I've already explained it
Baggly wrote: » You are an idiot but I do agree with the analysis.
JP Liz V1 wrote: » Did you take a shot today Eva yet, if so on who or was it blocked?
Eva WW wrote: » I really should have tried to shoot Conor again.
Katie WW wrote: » Why are you ignoring this Necro? Your tenses are wrong on the first post for your explanation. You’re speaking in the present tense when you should be speaking in the past tense. Either I felt stupid or I feel stupid for having mentioned it It feels like something from a BR
Necro wrote: Someone idiot check me please
Conor WW wrote: » Morning folks Struggling with something from last night. Orla isn’t evil based on her voting strategy, but she flips as a non- village team (I don’t actually know what neutral team means- good/bad/ in the middle). In a tight vote I don’t get her strategy. Anyone got any thoughts on why she’d play that way when self pres is an option and she’s a powerful role?
Conor WW wrote: » What are everyone’s thoughts to on the second team. Does it rule out an SK? Ellis is mentioned in the op but nothing there to indicate a second team. What sort of split makes sense in a17 player game with potentially two teams and an SK. 3/3/1 maybe?
Conor WW wrote: » Eva’s ffa was basically a pile of poo with lots of holes. That’s my issue with it. Her votes aren’t consistent with that in a tight race though, hence my confusion. It’s not helped by orlas flip since her vote looks village too What is your read on Eva?
Conor WW wrote: » Serial killer- a one person team
Angus WW wrote: » I dont buy both Eva and Orla having a shot, Eva survived and then has been in hiding since relatively speaking. I think they were both on the same time trying to avoid the lynch hence the lack of switching
Eva WW wrote: » Imagine a day 1 FFA being crap...at least I did one. You won't have to worry about me too much longer though as I put in a shot on you and I imagine team evil have a target on me too.
Angus WW wrote: » *same team
Conor WW wrote: » Not just crap, inconsistent as fook
Angus WW wrote: » True, but both won't have a shot on N1 which was what was indicated by Eva last night. We know now Orla wasn't lying even if she wasn't village
Angus WW wrote: » Cool, did you not want any thoughts on who you should shoot today? Given you'd already somewhat revealed you have a bullet, did you not think to ask for some village concensus? Or at least input?
Eva WW wrote: » How inconsistent? You were on it, I voted for you. Here's the thing, generally the only people who can be certain are evil because they know who is good. Not sure how that works in this game with factions but evils usually work as a team so they know more.
Conor WW wrote: » If we’ve a vig they have to be on you, which means I’m dead if you really have a shot. Not a great move for village since I’m village tbh
Conor WW wrote: » Vig should be bg
Conor WW wrote: » Inconsistent as in calls out Necro orla but no Necro on the ffa A pile of poo
Eva WW wrote: » Jesus Christ. Now I wish I was dead. You get that there are more than 3 baddies right? Where was yours?
Eva WW wrote: » Giving you the benefit of the doubt that you didn't read my many explanations. ORLAs interactions with Necro felt forced...as in contrived/desperate/scrambling. When combined with her Angus vote she was on my FFA. I also thought Katie may be evil (though less so now as she moved her vote) but I didn't include her because while suspicious she is more helpful than the 3 who made my list. Where was your FFA? Why am I constantly having to defend mine when so many didn't even do one?
Conor WW wrote: » Hang on there, how many baddies are there. I was trying to work this out based on having a neutral team this morning so if you know maybe you’d share? Also, what’s the story with your shot?
Eva WW wrote: » I am counting neutrals as baddies...ie not team village. We know there were 2 now, and I'm going to guess that there are 3 wolves. Either someone protected you or roleblocked me. I'd guess that it's a roleblock based on lack of BG flavour. If you really are village then that's a good thing.
Necro wrote: » I feel stupid mentioning it on thread tbh. One of those silly brainfart moments.
Katie WW wrote: » What’s this about??
Necro wrote: » I literally said out loud that I thought Brendan was a JOAT
Katie WW wrote: » Your tenses are wrong though
Conor WW wrote: » Back for at least some of the evening run in. I’ve caught up so going to put some thoughts here Angus is apparently peeked and doesn’t appear to be disputing it so he’ll likely be the vote tonight. I if you think you’ve caught a. Wolf you kill a wolf. Of the rest; Eva- I’ve given them a pretty hard time over the inconsistent ffa yesterday. It was and is jank though as they pointed out, day1 ffas aren’t going on much. I still can’t figure the voting since her vote is not wolfy last night but equally orla voted strangely. They’re pretty active which is good, they’ve also claimed a role we need in play so unless it’s countered we wait and see Necro was peeked good by Brendan, it’s a good look for Necro (see below for Bren and why) it’s possible a wolf is inpeekable but for now we kind of roll with it I think unless something else pops up Bren- I don’t see a wolf making Seer peek claim this early. He’s been pretty consistent in explaining the peek too so if he’s wolfy it’s the crazy wolf strategy. Couple of notable insights on other players too. Villager for me Baggly- lots of contribution, but a real fixation on Necro. Seems very meta in his conclusions. I don’t see a wolf staying in that tunnel tbh because it would eventually come back to bite. I’m not seeing what he is at this point so feels like a tunneller Fixxxer- nothing! That’s really surprises me there. Maybe there’s good reasons I dunno. It’s a bit meta but fixxer isnt a quiet player, although he’s actually too quiet for a wolf at this stage Phil- another that has nothing. More posts alright but no substantive content. I see questions, I see comments on comments, I see no actual independent thought process. Not a great look there tbh Frank- 9 of his fifteen posts are one line.15 of his fifteen posts do nothing to solve the game. He hasn’t even engaged on last nights events. I see why he’s being called out tbh So far of this set Frank and Phil stick out. Bren I have as village. Necro &Baggly feels like a village/village tunnel but the peek is probably influencing me there tbh. I’d be leaving fixxxer to self resolve at the moment, I don’t see him being here long if he doesn’t engage Going to look some more in a bit of detail now.
KathleenGrant wrote: Ok i didn't know about the random stuff so i suppose i should shut up about stuff i know nothing about.
KathleenGrant wrote: » Ok i didn't know about the random stuff so i suppose i should shut up about stuff i know nothing about.
Katie WW wrote: But why would the wolves want a tie with Orla? She wasn’t on their team And I switched to Necro at 8.50
Baggly wrote: » What doesn't make sense to you Katie. Mods say you get an extra vote but it has to be in by 6pm. Wolves submit at 6pm. Lynch unfolds as it does, tips Necro from 2 votes to 3 and forces the tie.
KathleenGrant wrote: » I am explaining my vote from 2 days ago. You were both deflecting at that time. There could be a scenario where you are both villagers but i am inclined to doubt it. You are both too strong to be put on the same team so one of you is probably not. I just haven't figured which one yet.
KathleenGrant wrote: I am explaining my vote from 2 days ago. You were both deflecting at that time. There could be a scenario where you are both villagers but i am inclined to doubt it. You are both too strong to be put on the same team so one of you is probably not. I just haven't figured which one yet.
Baggly wrote: » I did give reasons. And what I went after was him deflecting. Why are you accusing me of deflecting when I was going after him for the same? There is also a scenario where we are both villagers. Is there anything else about my posting that leads you to believe Im a wolf apart from me going after Necro?
Necro wrote: I think we lynch Conor tonight and Eva can blast Patrick if Conor flips wolf
JP Liz V1 wrote: So Necro is the top wolf, Hans, peek was a lie
Patrick WW wrote: » Brendan isnt claiming seer Conor.
Conor WW wrote: » Sorry, not well phrased Patrick. I mean that a wolf outing themselves as having a peek like that in a game with several teams is unlikely I think. It’s a red flag to other teams as well as a difficult lie to keep going for the rest of the game
Baggly wrote: » He hasn't been proven good FYI. That peek could be wonky if he is an alpha wolf. There is also a scenario where we are both villagers. Is there anything else about my posting that leads you to believe Im a wolf apart from me going after Necro?
Necro wrote: » See KathleenGrant, that was my point.
KathleenGrant wrote: Baggly, i voted for you because you were after Necro. You called him a wolf without giving reasons to back it up and when he tried calling you out on it you started deflecting. I didn't trust Necro, i didn't trust anyone really but you seemed to just want Necro gone. So i distrusted you more. Nothing more, nothing less.
JP Liz V1 wrote: At first I thought you were in the same team as Necro and you were going after him to throw us off scent but he has been proven good by a peek so I think you and Patrick WW are in the same team which is wolf
Necro wrote: » I think Brendan might be a JOAT.
