Baggly wrote: » Why have you been suss of my liz? Give us that. No issue with anyone being on me, but do have an issue with people being on me for no reason and then not putting in the work on others too.
Baggly wrote: » Can you give us reasons on your suspicions liz
Eva WW wrote: » I really should have tried to shoot Conor again.
Necro wrote: » I feel stupid mentioning it on thread tbh. One of those silly brainfart moments.
KathleenGrant wrote: » Actually Necro Katie is right. You had said you were going and would be back later and then the above. Your answer doesn't really hold water.
Necro wrote: » I was referring to mentioning that Brendo was the JOAT yesterday
Conor WW wrote: » Afternoon folks I’d agree with this. Cant really think of more than a wolf team and sk alignments based on what I know of DH. I guess we’ll find out for sure over the next few days as we piece this together
Conor WW wrote: » 15 posters, 17 playing I think so a few still to post
Conor WW wrote: » Jesus that’s quiet for a first day, and I include myself there.
Conor WW wrote: » Eva, if orlas Necro interaction is forced then why wouldn’t Necro be in your ffa?
Conor WW wrote: » Eva, explain this to me You seem to think Katie is a wolf but when you have the chance to ffa her you don’t- because she’s wolfy but useful? Can you also answer my previous question re orla?
Conor WW wrote: » I haven’t yet
Eva WW wrote: » Interesting that you started posting again after I voted for you. As for explanation: Katie might be a wolf but if she is, she is a posting wolf and they are easier to catch than low lying ones and they can often be useful in finding other evils. As mentioned in OP, there is likely more than one evil faction. As for why Orla over Necro it was the combination of the vote on Angus with the forced feeling of the interaction that landed her on my FFA.
Eva WW wrote: » Conor with a vote on me. Why? Because I voted for you? That's ridiculously lazy
Patrick WW wrote: » Its similar to what you did earlier with katie no? Glasshouses n all that
Conor WW wrote: » Not why orla over Necro, why orla but not Necro based on your reasons for having her there
Eva WW wrote: » Because Necro didn't vote for Angus just after Emily did.
Patrick WW wrote: » You accused Katie when shes FFAd you. Its not hard to see the similarities with Conors vote on you.
Eva WW wrote: » Yes. I accused her. I didn't ffa her or vote for her. I accused her. It is a game where you are supposed to accuse people. I also engaged with you and others who have accused me about those accusations. Conor arrived back on thread after I voted for him and voted for me. He didn't even engage about my reasons for FFAing and voting for him. He just wanted to pick holes in my FFA without mentioning himself. Very, very different
Angus WW wrote: » The scramble feels like a wolf in a precarious situation
Angus WW wrote: » I actually don't believe either! There is a wolf in the two of these or possibly two. The CFD suggestion from Emily is also notable depending on flips
Necro wrote: » I think Brendan might be a JOAT.
KathleenGrant wrote: Baggly, i voted for you because you were after Necro. You called him a wolf without giving reasons to back it up and when he tried calling you out on it you started deflecting. I didn't trust Necro, i didn't trust anyone really but you seemed to just want Necro gone. So i distrusted you more. Nothing more, nothing less.
JP Liz V1 wrote: At first I thought you were in the same team as Necro and you were going after him to throw us off scent but he has been proven good by a peek so I think you and Patrick WW are in the same team which is wolf
Necro wrote: » See KathleenGrant, that was my point.
Baggly wrote: » He hasn't been proven good FYI. That peek could be wonky if he is an alpha wolf. There is also a scenario where we are both villagers. Is there anything else about my posting that leads you to believe Im a wolf apart from me going after Necro?
Conor WW wrote: » Back for at least some of the evening run in. I’ve caught up so going to put some thoughts here Angus is apparently peeked and doesn’t appear to be disputing it so he’ll likely be the vote tonight. I if you think you’ve caught a. Wolf you kill a wolf. Of the rest; Eva- I’ve given them a pretty hard time over the inconsistent ffa yesterday. It was and is jank though as they pointed out, day1 ffas aren’t going on much. I still can’t figure the voting since her vote is not wolfy last night but equally orla voted strangely. They’re pretty active which is good, they’ve also claimed a role we need in play so unless it’s countered we wait and see Necro was peeked good by Brendan, it’s a good look for Necro (see below for Bren and why) it’s possible a wolf is inpeekable but for now we kind of roll with it I think unless something else pops up Bren- I don’t see a wolf making Seer peek claim this early. He’s been pretty consistent in explaining the peek too so if he’s wolfy it’s the crazy wolf strategy. Couple of notable insights on other players too. Villager for me Baggly- lots of contribution, but a real fixation on Necro. Seems very meta in his conclusions. I don’t see a wolf staying in that tunnel tbh because it would eventually come back to bite. I’m not seeing what he is at this point so feels like a tunneller Fixxxer- nothing! That’s really surprises me there. Maybe there’s good reasons I dunno. It’s a bit meta but fixxer isnt a quiet player, although he’s actually too quiet for a wolf at this stage Phil- another that has nothing. More posts alright but no substantive content. I see questions, I see comments on comments, I see no actual independent thought process. Not a great look there tbh Frank- 9 of his fifteen posts are one line.15 of his fifteen posts do nothing to solve the game. He hasn’t even engaged on last nights events. I see why he’s being called out tbh So far of this set Frank and Phil stick out. Bren I have as village. Necro &Baggly feels like a village/village tunnel but the peek is probably influencing me there tbh. I’d be leaving fixxxer to self resolve at the moment, I don’t see him being here long if he doesn’t engage Going to look some more in a bit of detail now.
Patrick WW wrote: » Brendan isnt claiming seer Conor.
Conor WW wrote: » Sorry, not well phrased Patrick. I mean that a wolf outing themselves as having a peek like that in a game with several teams is unlikely I think. It’s a red flag to other teams as well as a difficult lie to keep going for the rest of the game
JP Liz V1 wrote: So Necro is the top wolf, Hans, peek was a lie
Necro wrote: I think we lynch Conor tonight and Eva can blast Patrick if Conor flips wolf
Baggly wrote: » I did give reasons. And what I went after was him deflecting. Why are you accusing me of deflecting when I was going after him for the same? There is also a scenario where we are both villagers. Is there anything else about my posting that leads you to believe Im a wolf apart from me going after Necro?
KathleenGrant wrote: I am explaining my vote from 2 days ago. You were both deflecting at that time. There could be a scenario where you are both villagers but i am inclined to doubt it. You are both too strong to be put on the same team so one of you is probably not. I just haven't figured which one yet.
KathleenGrant wrote: » I am explaining my vote from 2 days ago. You were both deflecting at that time. There could be a scenario where you are both villagers but i am inclined to doubt it. You are both too strong to be put on the same team so one of you is probably not. I just haven't figured which one yet.
Baggly wrote: » What doesn't make sense to you Katie. Mods say you get an extra vote but it has to be in by 6pm. Wolves submit at 6pm. Lynch unfolds as it does, tips Necro from 2 votes to 3 and forces the tie.
Katie WW wrote: But why would the wolves want a tie with Orla? She wasn’t on their team And I switched to Necro at 8.50
KathleenGrant wrote: » Ok i didn't know about the random stuff so i suppose i should shut up about stuff i know nothing about.
KathleenGrant wrote: Ok i didn't know about the random stuff so i suppose i should shut up about stuff i know nothing about.