893bet wrote: » With Rolex you ain’t paying for high end finish. You are paying for the brand. From a bang for buck point of view the comparisons are pointless as it depends on your motivation as a buyer. If your tipple of choice is finishing and innovation you might tip toward the GS.....if you tipple is brand recognition and strong residuals you will choose the Rolex.
Wibbs wrote: » Quartz accuracy and a sweeping mechanical movement that never needs a battery? Sign me up. IMHO anyway the Seiko Springdrive is the only true innovation in personal timekeeping since quartz.
Wibbs wrote: » The Snowflake would be the exception for me. It's its own watch as it were.
CarProblem wrote: » In terms of liking GS but not buying - can I ask why? Is it that people on here flip a lot and the market is smaller? Unless my circumstances change and I can afford a 40mm ALS Saxonia I'll be keeping this one
CarProblem wrote: » In terms of liking GS but not buying - can I ask why? Is it that people on here flip a lot and the market is smaller?
unkel wrote: » When I ordered the big one from China that came in the post today, I had no idea, not even any hope, that soon I would own the little one too
Wibbs wrote: » seems to be missing the cyclops.
unkel wrote: » There is no cyclops on the Sea-Dweller Deepsea Bonus question for the experts though: how from the dial can you tell the wall clock is based on the older version, the 116660 and my watch is the 126660?
Fitz II wrote: » Now I dont mean to piss on your chips, but I think the big one is fake.
unkel wrote: » Watch this space. Picture coming in a few weeks. Where do I get a (fake) gold chain?
njburke wrote: » Unkle, like most watch guys I love detail, as an engineer I like technical detail.With the GS I've read there is more to be seen with an optic than the naked eye, to me that's more tangeble value than just having the value in the brand. It took effort to put that in the product, i'ld like to at least see it.Trust but verify. I had a longer personal story about a trip to fuji in japan I made in the 90s. We designed and built world class Inspection robots for component placement machines. Fuji made the placement machines and wanted our tools to monitor theirs during manufacture. They required our tool to perform at more than twice it's stated accuracy. I arrived with our man in japan, a kerryman who loved the culture. Why is nobody talking to us, well one guy had that burden,why do we have to eat in a room on our own? They're shaming us over the accuracy of the machine came the answer. Anyway, it was a long two days, I slept on the floor one night whilst running repeatability studies, woke up under a blanket which wasn't mine. Then I found 7.5 microns additional repeatability buried in the motion control, and more importantly a method to demonstrate it. Bingo, accuracy improved by a factor of 3. They were exceptional customers to us after that, we left with a shoeman sho, a purchase order for 6 tools and an obligation to deliver a waterford stanley cooker. The Kerryman understood the cooker hint, it was wasted on me.They had a special room for gifts from suppliers. What I've bought is the bargain basement GS, an sbgv225,9F quartz,newish and from a private collector in japan. I'll try to answer the question of what do GS include in the least of their current offerings.
Deep Thought wrote: » Would you have a link to the big one?
unkel wrote: » Cost me €130 all-in, including shipping. It did not get intercepted by customs. Not cheap by any means for a Chinese watch (no offense Thirdfox :pac:) but it looks cool and the sweeping seconds hand really makes it. Chuffed to bits that I now have the matching wrist watch too
blue5000 wrote: » Njb, wtf is a shoeman sho? Great story though. Would like to hear a few more sometime.