Necro wrote: » Nah that's why I disregarded in the first place tbh. Any suspicions yourself after the happenings of the last day or so. Sometimes a few of us have a tendency to... ahem... dominate the thread so it can be good to have other opinions come to the fore. Probably gonna take a bit of a backseat today myself and let other people post some more
Katie WW wrote: » Not necessarily, I wouldn’t clear anyone Patrick had a theory that Hans would peek good
KathleenGrant wrote: » Oh right, thanks. And character claiming? That's the actual character, not your role. So Eva saying she is the village vig is not character claiming?
Necro wrote: » Correct. Character claiming would be someone saying 'I'm XXXX one of the characters from the movie'
KathleenGrant wrote: » Ok and just one more thing. Why would a person announce themselves to be something if it targets them. Like Eva saying she has shooting powers or Brendan perking powers if it targets them to be taken out quicker. Like Brendan is gone already and Eva could have been.
Necro wrote: » How many wolves do we think are left?
y0ssar1an22 wrote: » i think for the minute we need to assume there is no neutral team 2. i dont do game design but based on 1 neutral team of 2, 17 players total, how many are likely?
Necro wrote: » 3, max 4. Would make for 5 or 6 non villagers in the group of 17 and 11/12 villagers.
y0ssar1an22 wrote: » lets plan for the worst. 4 wolves left, or 4 wolves total? 4 left: 7 vs 4 3 left: 8 vs 3
Rikand wrote: » Day 1: Automated Votals from #1 to #25Conor WW (1): Eva WWAngus WW (1): Emily WWNecro (2): Baggly, Katie WWBaggly (2): JP Liz V1, KathleenGrantSenan WW (1): NecroKatie WW (1): y0ssar1an22Orla WW (3): Angus WW, Frank WW, fixxxerEva WW (2): Patrick WW, Conor WWNo Vote (1): Orla WWFrank WW (1): Brendan WWNot voting (2):Phil WW, Senan WW, No VotePhase has ended. Just double checking these results and then I will return to you
Katie WW wrote: » If there’s no second neutral team why was Necro on three votes N1? I had kinda assumed that because Team 1 had a vote manipulation then so did Team 2 but that’s shot now Someone obviously had a second vote. Who benefited from that D1?
Necro wrote: » What do we do about fixXxer? Just leave him there? Conor's input isn't much better tbh, ditto with Phils.
Eva WW wrote: » It wasn't a second vote, they could end the day at a point where no more votes would count. I assumed that was how they got the tie with Necro tbh
Baggly wrote: » Morning all
Necro wrote: What do we do about fixXxer? Just leave him there? Conor's input isn't much better tbh, ditto with Phils.
KathleenGrant wrote: » If Brendan only had one peek and used that on Necro, how could he be sure you were good?
Eva WW wrote: » I was just going to mention fixxxer. With the number of missed votes and missed post counts he must be in line for the lynch tonight. We will need a proper strategy for the lynch later to make it harder for wolves to hide.
KathleenGrant wrote: » Angus and Frank both voted for Orla and Brendan voted for Frank so does that mean Frank is bad?
Baggly wrote: » I'd be amazed if there wasn't a protect on you, given you were an outed role. So it's either brendo took the hit or you weren't targeted.
y0ssar1an22 wrote: » what are the chances he is mod killed? bear with me here....if he is a NRV and will be modkilled are we better of lynching him? otherwise its a free kill for the wolves. there are pros and cons to weigh up but there is merit in having the discussion i think
Eva WW wrote: » The only other option would be that he protected Necro but there is always the old "peeks Good" option to be wary of. I'm interested in what you were saying about Patrick and Katie not being on a team because I think they might be.