Fitz* wrote: » SHU have a number of positives but their game is going ahead tonight.
Ace2007 wrote: » I think the issue with City was when they received news that their players/staff were positive - from reading reports it appears that they were all together - hence their bubble was breached. Although a West Ham game was similar when Moyes and someone else tested positive an hour before the game and it still went ahead. If Sheffield united on the other hand got the results yesterday, their bubble may not have the same level of breaches. Also depends who has it etc, if for instance for city - if it was the physio or the Masseuse who tested positive and found out after treating a number of players - then it's understandable to cancel the game. Having games so close after xmas was probably asking for trouble - footballers are generally not the smartest and will probably let their guard down.
dahat wrote: » Twitter alive with rumours of a 2 week break from football due to the outbreaks in England.
wonski wrote: » Rumours after the deadline don't matter anyway. Not sure why people bother with them. I already picked my team and captain. Nothing will change, unless you play that sky game where you can change things after the deadline.
Ace2007 wrote: » Balbuena has been a disaster for me - since bringing him in - he has been dropped/injured out of the blue twice and not even in the squad to night - sigh.
wanderer100 wrote: » Bowen benched ffs
Jim Gazebo wrote: » Was hoping lamptey would rise from the dead.