[Deleted User] wrote: » Someone was killed, did nothing to prompt continuous inspection/repair
questionmark? wrote: » Its an absolute joke that this keeps happening. Will it take someone getting killed before steps are taken to address what is very clearly an issue in the city centre.
Dermo123 wrote: » https://www.corkbeo.ie/news/local-news/emergency-works-underway-cork-city-19530559 Yet another building in a dangerous condition...
Curb Your Enthusiasm wrote: » Do you have details on that route?
TheChizler wrote: » They related to Marina Quarter Limited?
questionmark? wrote: » Its Glenveagh homes so if its who I'm thinking off will build. There is a but though, apartments aren't financially viable right now for many so it maybe a few years before a build even if permission granted. Looks great though and good use of the site.
TheChizler wrote: » Permission and flip?
major interest wrote: » SHD application gone in for 1,000 apartments for the former Ford distribution site in the marina.https://thesouthdocks.ie/
kub wrote: » At least Bus Eireann are being proactive here with their recently announced new 212 route.
normanbond wrote: » The coronavirus will have a huge impact on schooling and work practices in the near and far future. Remote learning and remote working will substantially increase as lessons are learned from behaviours during this pandemic. Students heretofore needed to move into university cities to attend college, this will no longer be the case. There will most likely be a big decline in overseas students arriving here. It would probably make sense that a moratorium be placed on granting planning permission to high rise student accommodation for a couple of years. Demand for same is hard to calculate now. Student accommodation blocks don’t have a provision for many car parking spaces so it’s unlikely they would be suitable for conversion into family accommodation units. In the event of diminishing demand for student accommodation it is hard to see what alternative use could they provide? Are we going to be looking at more ‘ghost developments’??
[Deleted User] wrote: » You're not doing a science course remotely.
cantalach wrote: » I see what you’re getting at but you have to look at the numbers too. If you compare the student population of UCC today with what it was 30 years ago, it has increased by far more than the total size of the CIT student population. I think neither group of residents could have anticipated the dramatic change of circumstances.
[Deleted User] wrote: » The area is historically desirable because it's situtaed beside the University. It's nothing the residents did. Colleges are a social need and need accommodation. The people being put out are those near MTU, given that many will have been living there before the college became an IT and, now, University
MikeOxsgreen wrote: » At the same time though, why should residents, having invested to make an area desirable, be discommoded and neighbourhoods potentialy ruined, for what is private developers responding to essentially a commercial operation.
[Deleted User] wrote: » You don't get to buy next to a constricted University the size of UCC and expect that your tranquil road will not be impacted. Anything between UCC and MTU is going to grow into student city, over the coming years. It's people on Model Farm Road who will be impacted unfairly (given the rapid growth of RTC/CIT/MTU), people right next to UCC should not be surprised