Baggly wrote: » "Baggly is being quiet, he only does that when evil, let's get him guys" That kind of thing.
Frank WW wrote: » emily and orla voting angus for no reason is suspicious
Katie WW wrote: » No idea yet Why are you voting me? Because I’m the only one who has tried to dissect the OPs? Seems like as good reason as any
Patrick WW wrote: » But its a crap shoot, as you said. You're as good as any, right?
Frank WW wrote: » i think wolves are eager in werewolf and occasionally like to post a lot early so im looking at katie, emily and necro . emily also casting a vote on angus for nothing makes her my number one wolf so far.
Baggly wrote: » I am not
Emily WW wrote: » Sod this. I know how to get you chatting. I’m off to the lynch thread.
Frank WW wrote: » 1. emily 2. orla 3. katie 4. necro theres your wolves right there. /thread. must get back to my job.
Katie WW wrote: » I always found wolves are more likely to lay low, not say too much to get caught out on I also think Necro has posted FA for him but I’d imagine that’s cause he’s nor at work rather than any other indicator
Eva WW wrote: » Based on OP I'm guessing Harry Ellis is SK and terrorists are wolves. I'm no good with balance but could there be 4 wolves plus an SK in a 17 player game? I think possibly depending on village powers.
Necro wrote: » Potentially yeah. yoss does bring up an interesting point though why does Frank 'point out' 4 wolves exactly. Inside knowledge?
y0ssar1an22 wrote: » 2 questions... are those 4 above based on anything? and 2, how do you know its 4?
Necro wrote: » Agreed, especially anon accounts that say absolutely nothing. Of the non-anons, four (yosser, JP Liz, Baggly and fixXxer) have one post each, I presume they will come alive later today.
Emily WW wrote: » You forgot Kathleen
Emily WW wrote: » You gotta start somewhere and seeing as Angus is at the start of the list, I chose the simplest option.
Orla WW wrote: » I joke not, this is a Christmas present a friend gave to me today The weather outside is frightful but the FHD fire on my Tv is delightful, but since nobody has no place to go, let it snow let it snow let it snow (it’s snowing that sleety sh*t where I am, would rather no snow to be fair)
Angus WW wrote: » Two people voted me, im less offended by Emily's one and Orlas just jumped on which is sussy. Quick flick of the posts and they all seem a little tasky! Tasks dont indicate alignment necessarily but I'm good and shes voted me so ill work on that logic.
Rikand wrote: » General Game Rules:Win Conditions: Any faction will have won the game when the game mod informs them as such
Necro wrote: » Can you explain that to me a little more Angus? The game mod has said they want as many Die Hard quotes as possible so I'm not seeing tasks being a thing in this game? And why does Emily's vote not bother you?
Angus WW wrote: » Didn't say it doesn't bother me, less offended! Its more the poetry element of the post I quoted. Not hugely up on Die Hard bar the basics of seeing it a couple of times over the years. All Orla has done is posted that guff
Orla WW wrote: » Can you See if you can find who has the detonators while you are there?
Orla WW wrote: » You are most troublesome for a security guard.
Orla WW wrote: »
Necro wrote: » Let's put that to the test then. Orla's 4 posts below: Die Hard and Let it Snow stuff. Guff. Die Hard Quote Another Die Hard Quote And a gif. Point taken, it's all fluff yet they piled onto you?