Joeytheparrot wrote: » You are taking the piss. She has spent about 2 or 3 years constantly pushing racist agendas; against the Ryan family, against black children, against Muslims, against Hazel Chu, against Aneta Safiak. She is completely and utterly racist.
V8 Interceptor wrote: » Skin colour is the way you put it. Demographics is the way I'd put it.
Joeytheparrot wrote: » "I'm not racist but....the demographics around here are getting very diluted"
Deleted User wrote: » It's a pretty ****e analysis of the demographics of a population to use a single photo to push a claim btw.
Nekarsulm wrote: » I didn't, when was it up? Been trying to keep away from the crazies, to be honest. Since her broadcast in the Phoenix Park shouting about the clouds and the planes... Enough crap going around withCovid....
V8 Interceptor wrote: » The "Ryan" family. She rightly called that out for the bullsh1t it was. Black children? I presume you mean the class photo. Highlighting the huge demographic change is not racist. Muslims, not a race. What racist thing did she say about Chu? Chu is a race baiter herself. (Never heard of the last person)
V8 Interceptor wrote: » How is that racist Joey? It was a very good one which is why it drove you guys nutty. It highlighted a trend across many parts of Ireland and because it was such a vivid photograph you guys couldn't bullsh1t your way around it.
V8 Interceptor wrote: » Five times you said racist in one post. Forgive me if I don't believe your claims given your quite frankly ludicrous idea that you provided above of what you think actual racism is. But regarding the so-called Ryans she rightly mocked a pathetic advert from Lidl, the kind of which we're seeing more and more of in Ireland now. The typical Irish family Lidl captioned "the Ryans" even though the guy was clearly not fecking Ryan. Black man with white Irish wife, the usual crap and never the other way around that we're just supposed to swallow as the new normal. Do you think these big Corporates should be above ridicule when they treat the public as though they're stupid?
V8 Interceptor wrote: » The "Ryan" family. She rightly called that out for the bullsh1t it was. Black children? I presume you mean the class photo. Highlighting the huge demographic change is not racist.Muslims, not a race. What racist thing did she say about Chu? Chu is a race baiter herself. (Never heard of the last person)
Joeytheparrot wrote: » Wow. You're defending her over the Ryan family and attacking children because of their skin colour. Just wow. Says it all really. Defend her racism and claim she's not racist. The truth is Gemma is a racist. You cant really deny it. You can deflect and argue over silly things. But none of it works. Gemma is racist. She's racist. She attacked the Ryans because Ms Ryans partner is black. She attacked school kids cause some of them are black. She attacked Hazel Chu cause she is of Chinese origin. She set her attack dogs on Aneta Safiak.
Deleted User wrote: » Eh, it outraged people because it resulted in white supremacists on social media sending around photos of children for a racist agenda.
Deleted User wrote: » A study of demographics doesn't tend to be based on photos btw. Things like censuses and others statistical data tends to be what such assessments are based on.
Deleted User wrote: » I'm also lost on what relevance the skin colour of anyone has on society outside of annoying bigots. Cause that's the only detail that is possible to highlight from the image... Nothing else.
Deleted User wrote: » Ya... Honestly, the very fact the ad pissed you off so much says a lot about you. You've endorsed targeting families and children multiple times now. The reason each time being race.
Deleted User wrote: » Why don't you like white people marrying non white people? It's a bit weird to have an issue with such a thing. But you clearly have an issue.
Nokia6230i wrote: » That old line? Trotted out by Dee, Gemma and you of course; while in the same breath banging on about them coming to "our country" and all that goes with that about "respecting our culture" and "obeying our laws" too not to mention you & your lot saying, repeatedly, they should go back to where they came from if they don't like it here.................cos all Muslims come from 1 Country apparently? Huge if true!!
cryptocurrency wrote: » Think she picked the wrong causes, doubled down to try and gain more traction, and the more nuts she looked the more the spiral went on....once in the bottom of that well it is hard work to try to climb out.
V8 Interceptor wrote: » Crypto I just liked your last post!
V8 Interceptor wrote: » I'm glad Crypto. But do the native Chinese consider them Chinese?
V8 Interceptor wrote: » If it wasn't the occasional one and large numbers of white settlers began arriving to such an extent that Chinese schools began having more white kids in them than native Chinese, would the latter still see it as entirely benign?
V8 Interceptor wrote: » I see. Are you Chinese Mam?
V8 Interceptor wrote: » Very fair point Mam. We're all pretty much the same when you get right down to it. I did that DNA hair thing and it came back 60% Irish 37% British (Ulster Prod Da) 2% Iberia and 1% Scandinavian. My mother's people from the west all had jet black hair and used to say summat about Spanish sailors (Armada wreck I guess). So there's the Iberian. (Dasdog I don't know what that means)
dasdog wrote: » Most of the boxes are being ticked in today's update. Bizarre Babylonian Towers is a new one.https://twitter.com/aciquestion/status/1332328589879029761?s=20
dasdog wrote: » When you associate with such people January 6th will be the first wake up call. A week and a so half later a realisation might set in that not all Americans are cvnts.
Deleted User wrote: » I think you should go to bed, you’re talking absolute rubbish.