ohnonotgmail wrote: » glad you found it funny. There is no point arguing with racists. you can't change the mind of somebody who doesn't have one.
Deshawn wrote: » In the last 3 pages of posts you have used the words "racist" or "racism" 10 times. Sometimes twice in one sentence. When asked to expand you say "nope. Can't be bothered" and then run away. Expand the old vocabulary
Deleted User wrote: » Oh have you yeah? Such as?
28% agree while 47% disagree that it is acceptable for a homosexual person to be a teacher in a school,
Approaching half (45%) of Muslim men and a third (33%) of Muslim women agree that “Wives should always obey their husbands”.
Deshawn wrote: » Wasn't it a photo with the all Ireland winning Dublin team? Hardly telescopic lenses in the bushes type stuff. I originally thought the team had gone overseas working with goal. It was a bit of a shock tbh.
Joeytheparrot wrote: » Jaysus. You were shocked at seeing black people.
doublejobbing 2 wrote: » Oh no. Although I have endorsed Trump, for your lot that is sort of the same so.
doublejobbing 2 wrote: » It was implied.
doublejobbing 2 wrote: » Exactly what is wrong with a tomato and spread sandwich and soup for lunch? How big of a lunch do you require? You have proof for this I take it. They certainly have basic options. Meat or no meat. Chicken or fish. Sounds a bit like hospital. Or a wedding. I'm also going to hazard a guess all meat is halal by default. An option not to my knowledge taken care of in most canteens operated by the state. I couldn't. I doubt the Queen would be mad into a 4 quid chicken fillet roll from Spar but half the country eats them during the week. I'm not exactly sure what your point here is. Asylum seekers deserve a better standard of lunch than the processed bread and meat most people eat five days a week at 1pm?
doublejobbing 2 wrote: » Oh I agree. Let's outlaw backpacking around South America and interrailing around Europe while we're at it. I've shared dorms with all sorts down the years, the Thai government should have given me my own beachside chalet! And don't start me on the culturally inappropriate food. You try getting a garlic cheese chips and quarter pounder in Sihanoukville at 3am, then come crying to me about Aramark. The vast majority of these people are economic migrants there of their own volition. "Whole lives" show me a child refugee who spent 17 years in a single room.
CtevenSrowder wrote: » How about the multiple terrorist attacks that have occurred over the last number of years? Or the teacher murdered for showing cartoons depicting Mohammed? Or the grooming gangs in Britain? Or the views that (British) Muslims have towards gay people and women's rights? https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/apr/11/british-muslims-strong-sense-of-belonging-poll-homosexuality-sharia-lawhttps://www.ipsos.com/sites/default/files/ct/publication/documents/2018-03/a-review-of-survey-research-on-muslims-in-great-britain-ipsos-mori_0.pdf (pg 59, 60). We can also look to Chechnya and Turkey for the negative influence Islam has in these countries (or republic in Chechnya's case). It's a precarious game as it's important to try and not talk about Muslim's as one big homogenous group, but the ideology itself has little positive influence on the countries upon which it exists in. And it's a bit ridiculous to be playing dumb as to the influence it's had in Europe over the last number of years in particular.
AndrewJRenko wrote: » How about the multiple terrorist attacks carried out by Irish people in the name of Ireland over the years? Or the teacher murdered in the UK by her white English pupil? Or the majority of grooming gangs in the UK that are not Asian or Muslim? Should we be banning Irish people and English people too? Or is it just a certain skin colour that you're actually concerned about?
ohnonotgmail wrote: » racist is racist. it doesn't matter what the colour of your skin.
doublejobbing 2 wrote: » If I were an employer I'd have serious reservations with giving any responsibility to an adult with this level of naivety.
AndrewJRenko wrote: » If she wanted to show changing demographics, she should have used demographic data.
AndrewJRenko wrote: » She wanted to rile up her knuckle-dragging supporters with a picture of black children, taken off a school website. And you're defending her.
Nokia6230i wrote: » This evening @ GPO Muslim Sisters of Eire, a fully reg.'d charity were on hand to hand out supplies, provisions to the needy (NB; they also did this on Christmas Day afternoon between 3 & 5:30pm O'Clock approx. and "sold out" such was the demand). Meanwhile Dolores & friends did some sort of a Ballyer-Newry convoy to "Stick it to the Man" & ended up back at the GPO; totally impinging on the good work MSOE were doing there this evening. They may not've know who MSOE are or what they do & it may've been pure chance; but under such circumstances couldn't they've taken their Hatred Campaign elsewhere, even just for today? Not like Custom House Quay for example was busy. Now if I was MSOE (who comprise a number of nationalities incl.; shock horror Gemma fans, Irish people) I'd've been quite intimidated; I know MSOE've encountered much online racial & anti Islam abuse & it's from Dee & Gemmas mob a lot of it comes from; imagine being "inspired" by them like? You should be inspired by MSOE instead; they're literally "Helping Our Own First".....
NovemberWren wrote: » The main political parties run around'about the hinterlands thither and yon, for the votes of the very many poorer Irish there. But somehow they stay poor. These big parties don't have any real regard for the [non-big-farmer] Irish and over time just want to replace them; with people with no histographic link to the areas, or comprehension of the mealy acre-rent origins of themselves.
CtevenSrowder wrote: » Who said anything about banning anyone? Or anything about skin colour? Of that's right, only you. To suggest that Islam hasn't had an influence on Europe over the years, one must be simply burying their head in the sand.
Beasty wrote: » Back on topic everyone
V8 Interceptor wrote: » As said already, a picture can speak a thousand words. Again, she took it from a newspaper.
V8 Interceptor wrote: » 'Twas a local paper HQ'd in Mullingar which is where I believe the school was.
AndrewJRenko wrote: » So what's your planned mechanism to restrict Muslim influence here?
Joeytheparrot wrote: » Doesnt matter. Shes still racist.
V8 Interceptor wrote: » I don't think she is Joey. A bit loopy alright.
V8 Interceptor wrote: » She took it from a Mullingar newspaper.
Nekarsulm wrote: » A few facts for you. She took the school class photo from The Longford Leader website. It was one of those "first day in school" type photos. The school is the Church of Ireland national school in Longford town. A surprising number of people from Central and West Africa belong to various Lutheran churches , and as such tend to send their children to C of I schools, where possible. It wasn't a class photo, it was the entire school. So no need to be worried about a "Muslim invasion" based on her "evidence ". Unless you object to Christian's who are the "wrong" colour, as Gemma does?
Deshawn wrote: » Did you not see the one from Lucan?
V8 Interceptor wrote: » Skin colour is the way you put it. Demographics is the way I'd put it. And how would it be a conspiracy theory if it was there in a photograph?
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://wc.vanillicon.com/v2/c599644a213e5f18742e0afff85076a6.svg)
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://wd.vanillicon.com/v2/dbba4c22aa1d352d2cdbb076e36aea8c.svg)
