Rows Grower wrote: » The incident happened inside the premises and the CCTV recordings did not disappear but don't let the facts get in the way of your little rants there lad.
the beer revolu wrote: » I'd like to be clear here. The only people I called scumbags are people I witnessed behaving in a scumbag fashion - and I witnessed this several times over the years. I did not witness what happened outside sidetrax and have not referred to these people as scumbags. The gentleman that you are quoting doesn't seem to understand this. (in my experience, compression and reasoning, generally, wasn't a big thing amongst security staff of that era) However, afaik, a lad was beaten to death and the security tape mysteriously disappeared. Make of that what you will.
the beer revolu wrote: » A fella lost his life outside sidetracks. It wasn't all fun and games. I saw bouncers in action plenty of times (while not being involved) and I saw plenty of behaviour that would have warranted prosecution. I also saw them having a good ole laugh afterwards. There were plenty of scumbags in suits who enjoyed the agro with the drunk scumbags but they were all scumbags in my eyes.
Straight Talker wrote: » In fairness like a fella died tragically, due to inappropriate behaviour by security staff.So there is no doubt that pubs and clubs etc, have had people working the doors, that shouldn't be working the doors, if you know what i mean.As the old saying goes, if the cap fits then wear it.;)
Rows Grower wrote: » Stand by what you want lad. Call people scumbags all you want, just don't be surprised when you get called out on it lad.
JP Liz V1 wrote: » Was that Nancy Spains?
Padraig Mor wrote: » Maybe I'm wrong (God knows, I often am) but is the Three Ones not Tom Barry's now?
Flesh Gorden wrote: » For a few years before the current owners took over, The Friary had an interesting cliental and a nickname I'd get permabanned if I typed out; "B & K" if anyone can decipher that. I've a memory burned into my head of a heavily pregnant woman balancing her pint on her bump outside there whilst lighting a cigarette.
Deleted User wrote: » Is the Quinryan on Barrack Street still open?
Dav010 wrote: » Who hasn’t?
IAMAMORON wrote: » I rode a bird in the Jacks in the Wash one night, how phucking rough is that?
the beer revolu wrote: » I will, thanks, lady.
the beer revolu wrote: » Firstly, don't refer to me as, lad, please. You said "everyone knew everyone else and when the few clatters were thrown and the trouble makers were sober there was no problems". This gave the impression, to me, that violence wasn't serious to you. Now, I stand by what you quoted me as saying and I stand by my claim that I am not tarring everyone with the same brush. I am calling security staff that enjoy agro scumbags. All of the security staff that enjoy agro. (all of them were scumbags - both the drunk scumbags and the suited ones) I did not call all security staff scunbags - just the scumbag ones - and I saw plenty of them in action. Understand, now, little boy? (do you like that form of address?)
Rows Grower wrote: » No lad, I didn't actually. I never mentioned banter or craic. And yes, you did tar everyone with the same brush. You said and I quote "There were plenty of scumbags in suits who enjoyed the agro with the drunk scumbags but they were all scumbags in my eyes".
the beer revolu wrote: » Actually, you did suggest that it was all a bit of banter and craic and not really serious - that's what prompted me to post. For me violence is always serious. I didn't tar anyone with any brush. I mentioned my observations of violent behavior and called out the perpetrators as scumbags. If I see 4 or 5 lads dragging a person down an alleyway for a hiding while another 2 block the alley, I have no hesitation in calling them scumbags. And yes, the suited scumbags had a great ole laugh about it afterwards. That's just one incident that I witnessed over the years. I have no doubt that there were some decent security staff around back then but I saw a lot of bad behaviour - criminal behaviour.
Rows Grower wrote: » I never said it was all fun and games and you can judge all you want and tar everyone with the same brush if you want.
Deleted User wrote: » Mangans was rough alright, Chandras was grand imo, De Lacey house was usually fine, I saw a few fights outside the Cruicin but nothing major. I can't think of anywhere that was very rough tbh.
Rows Grower wrote: » It was a Celtic supporters club venue in Passage West, often went to a few Celtic Rangers matches with a few of the lads from there.
Cona wrote: » Catwalk and Mangans were rough ?!?!? Full of 17-21 year olds, hardly the criminal underworld.