McMurphy wrote: » There's a very comparable case imo* (an opinion is passed as fact in here these days) Keep up - Reilly was sceptical about vaccinations in the past because a family member had a bad reaction to one (that was presumably passed here as safe), but apparently Reilly was bang on to be sceptical, but anyone else worrying about a vaccination having a nasty affect on them or a family member is a headbanger. FG logic. I never said you were Reilly, nor give a shiny shyte whom you vote for, but I will add that your demeanor is very FG, and that's grand by the way.
Kraftwerk wrote: » Why do you keep talking about FG, FG logic, FG demeanour, things FG love getting caught up in, people in glass houses etc etc?What has any of that got to do with me being critical of a woman who refused to pay rent on her charity house until she was forced into doing it? It's got nothing to do with it. It's all bog standard Shinner whataboutery. No matter what the topic just keep rambling about FG.
McMurphy wrote: » This bit was comparable with James Reilly, he is of FG stock, FG are in Govt, basic enough stuff.
Bowie wrote: » There was also a post from Sarah Carey posted here in regard to the FG spin of SF running the whole covid measures up north. This led to a chap talking about Wynne and O'Snodaigh for some completely unrelated reason and off we went.
blanch152 wrote: » Some immune systems do not cope well with vaccines, and there is usually a genetic component to that issue. Therefore, there are medical reasons why Reilly would be careful with later vaccines. That is nothing compared to the type of anti-vaxxers that inhabit Sinn Fein. I have ensured that all of my children got vaccines and me myself. However, if one of us had leukemia or some such disease, for medical reasons they would not have been vaccinated. So, if you do not understand the difference between medical advice on vaccinations compared to anti-vaxxer nutters, then you need to consider it.
blanch152 wrote: » So Wynne and O'Snodaigh are off-topic in the Sinn Fein thread, but we can talk about some nonentity claimed to be a member of FG. That is funny.
McMurphy wrote: » Irony..... Complains about people not reading things properly. Then completely misreads who the poster is he's quoting. :pac:
Yeah_Right wrote: » I'm glad she paid what she owed. 4 years too late. It was still theft. I believe it's quite common for criminals to make reparations to their victims after they get caught. Sorry Bowie, IMO it was still theft.
Yeah_Right wrote: » Do you really need me to explain that I was replying to the post I quoted (the one by JM) and in that reply there was a nod to an earlier exchange with another poster (Bowie). If you had read the thread, even just the last few pages, you might have understood that and not made yourself look like a fool. Irony?
Bowie wrote: » That's cula bula chief. I was correcting someone else before you chimed in to defend. That poster called her a thief like it was fact. Again, if she was she was, just clarifying, she was not in reality. She paid money to a charity or something. There were no reparations as nobody was robbed. This was raised to deflect from Sarah Carey. Got the spotlight off Reilly making an arse of the SF anti-vaxxer claims
Yeah_Right wrote: » Apology accepted.
blanch152 wrote: » Your logic is deeply flawed. The occam’s Razor conclusion is the reason there are more articles criticising Sinn Fein is that there is more to criticise.
TheTruth123 wrote: » All the name calling, attempts to stop the rise is support has actually improved peoples outlook on SF as anyone with a bit of sense will have seen 6 months of attacls by FFG to SF, with Leo even telling everyone SF dont want you if you are white or a male
hatrickpatrick wrote: » Even FG's own backbenchers sounded the alarm over how the relentless attacks on SF were causing the public to dig their heels in. When the party's own rank and file has rejected a tactic as disastrous and self-defeating, you'd think their supporters on a discussion forum would stop defending it
Bowie wrote: » Reilly fits the criteria put forward as anti-vaxxer on here. I wouldn't call anyone having reservations, fear or questions an anti-vaxxer, but some folk like yourself set that bar. Or are you claiming that measles and the vaccine were brand new? What about the anti-vaxxers that inhabit FF/FG? Are they merely raising concern or having reservations, but not anti-vaxxers? :rolleyes:
hatrickpatrick wrote: » Bullsh!t. By definition, any government which is as much of a clusterf*ck as our current government merits more hit pieces than their opposition. They're actually making decisions which are directly affecting peoples' lives, the opposition far less so due to the current whip system. It comes across as extremely biased when there is article after article about relatively minor Sinn Fein issues such as social media crap, and comparatively less about the utter chaos currently at the heart of the actual government.
Brendan Bendar wrote: » Someone has to warn the public, a chara. Look at Derren, if you can’t get in via election come in from underneath. We are not all tubes. Plenty more to come.
FrancieBrady wrote: » A bit like how Leo got to be Taoiseach? And then the electorate turfed him out when they got their...all but 21% of them that is. He's hanging in there to bring FG back to the low 20's though, fair play to him.
blanch152 wrote: » A government that has a country in the top 10 of every possible metric? Again Occam’s Razor is against you on this one.
McMurphy wrote: » Brenner didn't think that brainfart through too well
Kraftwerk wrote: » The brainfart here is yourself and Francie thinking an elected TD is the same as an unelected councillor. People don't vote for party leaders, parties do. Then again shinners don't seem to understand elections too well. SF won the election :pac:
mattser wrote: » Their obsession with Leo in their thread is box office entertainment :D Happy Christmas.
McMurphy wrote: » **Whoosh** It is better to remain silent..... Than to open your gob and remain all doubt. You need to reread Francies post, especially the Taoiseach bit, and the electorate throwing them out, then when you've done that, go back and read it again, maybe s further time for the craic, and when you have that done, come back here and add another emoji to your post.
Kraftwerk wrote: » I've read it. The usual Shinner gob****e stuff. In response to a comment on an unelected councillor sneaking in the back door he said its like how an elected TD was then voted leader of the party. And now we'll have 3 pages of shinners trying to justify their idiotic comments. Hilarious how ignorant shinners are elections :pac:
FrancieBrady wrote: » The 'electorate' said 'No thanks' to de Party Kaftwerk. Tough reality that for you all.
