markodaly wrote: » promise cheap housing and a UI Ireland with all the other stuff like low taxes but world class public services. I have magic beans to sell.
hatrickpatrick wrote: » I can 100% guarantee that those who have flocked to SF due to the ongoing cost of living issue won't give two sh!tes about these stories - and that the relentless focus on this type of crap by the media is fuelling a very real sentiment that there's a concerted effort to delegitimise SF by "official Ireland".
I don't know how many times this is going to have to be repeated, but the cost of living situation for young people is so unbelievably dire that literally no amount of deflection whatsoever is going to make the slightest bit of difference. The only thing that can stem the flow of young voters to SF is the emergence of another viable leftist party. Nothing else is going to work. I don't even think a change in policy or ideology by FF or FG would work at this stage, there's too much bad blood by now and nobody would believe such a policy or ideological change was sincere.
I've said this many times over the years, but if a credible leftist party without SF's baggage were to emerge, many young people would abandon SF. It's not about party, it's about ideology. And no amount of personal crap can change the fact that neoliberalism as an ideology is actively destroying young peoples' lives, ergo regardless of how low SF or its online supporters stoop, they are still seen as a better option than the others.
FrancieBrady wrote: » They aren't 'in charge' but you are correct, it is in another period of chaos. It's a failed state.
Deleted User wrote: » Or people see through pretend outrage and that they dont like being taken for mugs.....FFG screaming house down about paratroopers being killed in troubles had a quare smack of desperation off it. Mere months after wanting to hold commerations for black.and tans......seems they havnt learnt anything and are still working from assumption the electorate is wrong always
tikkahunter wrote: » Might take up this tactic in work , go in do nothing all day shout at everyone else about how much of **** job they are doing . Seems that what makes you popular these days .
[Deleted User] wrote: » Tbf the polling data was likely done before this story broke?? FFG hearts are obviously broken,they've pour extra-ordinary amounts of resources into trying to damage/curtail the shinners (cultural hedgemony in practice fyi).....whereas stories like lads charging e1200 for a garden shed in tallaght,3000 kids homeless this xmas are ultimately what people get when they vote ffg ....and they cant challenge these without hurting their core vote Micheal martin rather bizzare attempt to claim their was no bailout of the banks was in hindsight,just a blantent attempt to raise a pointless controversy to distract from polling data..
McMurphy wrote: » So the Shinners went way out in front of the blueshirts in a poll? Explains the rehashed non story about a "secret Facebook page" so. Btw, I checked yesterday, I'm only a member of two groups on Facebook I joined myself. I'm in a few more (including a rowing club in Western Australia) - that people added me to, without needing or asking for my consent in doing so. I suggest they cease the stupid constant online attacks - you only need to take a cursory look on social media to see the public recognise what is going on. The Shinners are in charge up there now. When did that happen Brenner? You're rattled horse.
Brendan Bendar wrote: » Meanwhile the North is in chaos with the Shinners in charge.......
Deleted User wrote: » Well Thats the important thing here surely
FrancieBrady wrote: » It's not working...try harder:https://twitter.com/sob999/status/1340400319952539648
FrancieBrady wrote: » Do a search or don't believe me. Not bothered either way tbh. If you are unaware of YFG contributions to social media, should you really be debating this point?
[Deleted User] wrote: » Look fwd to seeing that discussed in the fg thread if it turns out to be worthy Now, the group that was reported as administered by sf officials with sf officials as members with what seems to be many extremely problematic posts You'll have thoughts on that, surely?
feargale wrote: » Let's have them. If you choose to engage in whataboutery the least you should do is substantiate.
FrancieBrady wrote: » Examples posted throughout the thread.
expectationlost wrote: » what legislation do you want introduced?
blanch152 wrote: » Schools are among the safest working environments, they are not meat factories, hospitals, nursing homes or retail. SF latch on to every populist cause, hence them calling for schools to close but pubs to stay open. If you want the lowest common denominator, look for Sinn Fein.
feargale wrote: » Or doing! Some do give more than a toss. Some don't. So, parity of esteem means some should say what they like without being countered, while others, in the words of John M. Kelly many years ago, "can't say boo to you." Examples please.
FrancieBrady wrote: » As O'Broin said, there is a very easy way to deal with all this, and it is an issue for people personally and across SM, introduce legislation. In other words, do your job
FrancieBrady wrote: » What's the danger of a closed group? Who gives a toss what they're saying?
FrancieBrady wrote: » Not complaining about YFG at all, they are doing a great job IMO. Just pointing to the fact it happens everywhere.
FrancieBrady wrote: » What have they posted to this group?