Ok, bear with me...
This is a memory I had a couple of days ago about an inebriated debate with a good friend in my college days, probably at a party.
We were talking about the consequences of the availability of full Star Trek style teleportation and how it would radically alter the human geography of the planet.
Basically he was arguing that if everyone had access to affordable teleportation, they would mostly want to live in warm, resort parts of the world, such as the Mediterranean, Caribbean, California coast, Florida, Brazil and South East Asia. Migration would dramatically increase, to the point where a country’s population could double over the space of a year.
All these places would be swamped by demand for housing so strict controls on the would have to be enforced.
I argued that we were much more likely to see very strict controls on who has access to such radical new technology, to the point where it was hugely restricted.
Who do you think had the more credible opinion? Please feel free to add your own.

:cool: