ClanofLams wrote: » Cork should definitely be more competitive. Tipperary isn't that small relatively speaking. Some people should realise that throwing out cliches about sport and how it always changes etc and other nonsense is irrelevant in the unique context of GAA when talking about a county with 20% of the population on the island and a massive funding advantage who are growing the gap as they win six in a row. Just delusional and detached from reality stuff.
Kalani CoolS Filet wrote: » Maybe the AI could be reduced to 5 teams - Connaught, Munster, Leinster (without Dublin), Ulster, and Dublin.
lawrencesummers wrote: » Population has always been skewed towards Dublin but this period of dominance s is only recent. If all things were equal then I would accept population as an advantage, but the ability of many counties to actually put a competitive inter county team out that is based on long term support, development and investment is completely lacking in many counties. Cork are a perfect example, the incompetence of their administrators has been clear to see across the development of Pairs Ui Caoimh. Old power hungry dinosaurs with dodgy stuff going on all over the place. Look at the experience of Eddie Brennan and what he has to say about the most recent county board he was involved with. Eddie knows what it takes to win. The truth of the matter is that the administrators in many counties are holding back GAA in that county
olestoepoke wrote: » All the accusations of Dublin receiving more money from the GAA than anyone else are they true? Has anyone any evidence that they receive more per capita than any other county in funding? Or is it all just emotive salty tears, give me my ball back I'm not playing anymore, I'm going home because you're too good and I can't win? Where they always given more money than the rest of the country or does the increase coincide with their recent success because I cant remember any complaining when they were terrible and won one AI in 25 years or so. What about Kilkenny in the hurling? Didn't they win a record amount in a row? Did they ruin hurling? Why weren't they split in two given less money and told to stop winning. Stop the whinging, dont get mad just get better and challenge.
the kelt wrote: » Are you genuinely asking if it’s true Dublin have been receiving more money from the GAA than other counties???
ClanofLams wrote: » So GAA is unique amongst sports and funding has no impact?
FromADistance wrote: » Administrators in most counties have full time jobs. They are being asked to run multi million euro businesses (effectively) whilst trying to set the direction of games in the county and hold down a full time job. Dublin can head off to the likes of AIG and pocket 800k p.a for selling their 'brand'. And attract all sorts of other corporate sponsors without too much hassle. That pays for their full time admin setup, paid CEO etc. Leitrim for example are sponsored by a pub in New York. Their last sponsorship deal was worth 20k p.a. so I very much doubt they get much more. 20k might pay for 1 part time official. Having a full time administration setup allows counties the time and space to setup structures and craft strategic direction. You need time and money to do that and as far as I can see most counties do not have either. 'Volunteering harder' wont solve those basic issues. The GAA have allowed this to happen so this problem is squarely on their doorstep. Unless county boards stand up for themselves and start challenging this, nothing will change.
olestoepoke wrote: » Yes I am. Money from the GAA per capita more than any other county.
piplip87 wrote: » I dont think the problem is so much with Dublin as it is with the Leinster Championship, Dublin get to the 1/4 finals every non COVID year playing training games, where as the likes of Tyrone, Kerry and Mayo will have had at least 1 close hardly fought game. This makes a massive difference, Dublin can have their off day in Leinster and still win by 10 points. Where as if Kerry or Tyrone have one it's the backdoor tour of the country. Dublin are a completely different beast to what we have seen before. Their possession based play, while effective is so boring to watch and adds nothing to the game. There needs to be some serious changes to football and the structure of the championship. I know my local club started playing this possession based crap of hand passing it around centre field and I stopped going to games. I'd imagine I'm not alone
ooter wrote: » Kerry have been getting money pumped in to them for the guts of 25 years now and that was grand while Dublin were being sponsored by arnotts but once they got their house in order and realised their value it's suddenly a problem
doc_17 wrote: » The people trying to defend the current situation by saying “it’s up to everyone else to get their own houses in order” are the worst kind of people to listen to. They are like Tories who say it’s up to the poor to pull themselves up by their own bootstraps - despite these Tories having been handed their wealth by someone else. That’s the current Dublin situation.
jimmytwotimes 2013 wrote: » Some figures to back that up
StupidLikeAFox wrote: » What would you suggest for a middle of the road team like Kildare/Meath/cork to do to sort their **** out and possibly replicate what Dublin have?
Gooey Looey wrote: » https://bfy.tw/Py7l
olestoepoke wrote: » Whats that?
Gooey Looey wrote: » Plenty of articles written about it. DYOR. Here's the 1st 4 links to get you started:https://www.rte.ie/sport/gaa/2019/0614/1055359-dublin-funding/https://www.sportsjoe.ie/gaa/dublin-receive-e15-million-more-than-any-other-county-in-games-development-grants-over-the-last-decade-149534https://sportforbusiness.com/is-dublin-gaa-funding-fair-and-proportionate/https://www.thesun.ie/sport/gaa-football/3725588/dublin-gaa-development-funding-1-3m/
olestoepoke wrote: » https://sportforbusiness.com/is-dublin-gaa-funding-fair-and-proportionate/ Did you actually read this one? Because it goes against your argument.
Gooey Looey wrote: » No I didn't, I provided the first 4 links for you to do your own research!
namloc1980 wrote: » So we're at the stage that we have people denying Dublin have neither a financial nor a population advantage.
olestoepoke wrote: » So you randomly put forward articles to back up your argument without reading them?
elefant wrote: » 1. A massive population and huge funding/professionalism to get the best out of that statistical advantage. 2. A massive population without huge funding/professionalism, and consequently not maximising the statistical advantage. 3. A much lesser population and huge funding/professionalism to get the best out of those numbers. 4. A much lesser population without huge funding/professionalism. These are the options. Dublin were at 2 for years, and are now at 1 and will likely remain there forever. Many other counties are at 3 and 4, and some have populations so small it takes a remarkable crop of players to even challenge those in 3 and 4. In any case, no other county can ever reach option 1 or 2. Unless Ireland, as a nation, bucks the global trend of urbanisation this is where we are at, in perpetuity. The GAA have just accelerated Dublin's move into the top tier, way beyond what any other county can replicate. Any argument that statistics don't kick points is so outdated at this stage it's not worth even engaging.
olestoepoke wrote: » They've always had a population advantage, this was never an issue that was brought up when they won one AI in over 2 decades.