joe123 wrote: » So took the plunge with the Samsung Q95T - its currently at 1399 euro, same price as the Q90T. Soundbar included. If anyone here has bought qled from richersounds let me know and we can both avail of the refer a friend claim which will get us 100 euro off.
joe123 wrote: » Unfortunately RS contacted me yesterday letting me know that after the order was taken, they didnt realise that they are out of stock so had to cancel the order. They offered another TV but it just wasn't as good. I'll be back to them at some stage as they were very apologetic so I'll post back in here if I manage to pick up a Q90/95T before the offer ends. Have to say I'm gutted now after so much research and finally taking the plunge, to end up with no TV before the Christmas.
Deleted User wrote: » Who was it that said soundbars and Dolby Atmos are a gimmick??? Sweet Jesus someone must be deaf, this is fricking insane!!
Muppet Man wrote: » Sorry... might have sent you on a wild goose chase with the HDMI comment above. I had a look just there and it simply says 4k/120hz for all the HDMI ports. I think my HDMI 2 port is for Arc/eArc... which I'm not using. that probably confused me.
wotzgoingon wrote: » What about this price? https://www.laptopsdirect.ie/lg-49nano866na-49-smart-4k-ultra-hd-hdr-led-tv-with-google-assistant-ama-49nano866na/version.asp
theteal wrote: » Yeah I read that, I assume the poster meant cheaper bars with faux atmos without the actual upfiring speakers. An AVR and separates are always going to be better but will cost a fortune for a 5.1.4 setup - as well as a pain in the hoop for cabling. Some of these new bars have shown impressive performance. I've just bought the JBL 9.1 for about £525 so I'm not expecting world beating sound but it's very tidy solution and should be perfect for what's needed here.
Goose81 wrote: » Think that was me, no I meant any soundbar with Atmos. I'm comparing it to a full system with floorstanding speakers though so not really fair.
theteal wrote: » I think you'd be surprised at the performance of the high end 7/5.1.4 sound bars. Not exactly cheap in comparison to what the average user might expect a soundbar to cost but still substantially cheaper (and less DIY) than an AV receiver and separates that can provide the same number of channels. Obviously you're going to get better atmos with in-ceiling speakers but having had a run through with a few e.g. Samsung Q90R, LG SN11 and JBL 9.1 (I'd also keep an eye out for the new Klipsch 1200 too), I definitely wouldn't call the their atmos credentials a gimmick. I've not sampled the cheaper bars with virtual atmos but going by reviews, the same probably can't be said for these. Anyway, there's a AV section for this kinda stuff, forgive the derail lads.
Goose81 wrote: » I've no doubt expensive soundbars can be great, I'd actually like to hear one to see. I just mean ATM I'm running 5.1 , I could run Atmos if I wanted but I'm not going to butcher my roof. I suppose what I mean is no Atmos soundbar is going to sound better than a proper 5.1 setup with floorstanders that cost more than any soundbar alone. If I had no av equipment I would be spending my money on a decent 5.1 system over any Atmos soundbar and would be advising anyone new to audio to do the same , I suppose that was my point when I said Atmos soundbar was a gimmick.as an audiophile I would only count something as Atmos when there is a separate speaker for everything and they are positioned correctly. Atmos is supposed to fire downwards towards your head, a soundbar or headphones make this impossible to ever achieve. To give context I'm not running mega high end stuff but a pioneer vsx 933 , a monitor audio bx centre and fyne audio floorstander and bookshelf fyne audios in a 5.1 setup. So no Atmos soundbar is going to touch that for quality even though it's only 5.1 But then this is the type of space your giving up so it's a trade off
Deleted User wrote: » You don't need to butcher your roof. They have up and side firing speakers that bounce sound off the roof and walls. The only thing I would say is room configuration is important. I dont think they'd work very well in a corner setup like in the picture you've shown.
Goose81 wrote: » I don't need to butcher my roof man, there's 6 grands worth of av equipment in that pic. My 5.1 setup craps over any soundbar money can buy so relax trying to tell me how Atmos systems work lol, I know alot more than you do about how they work! That one speaker costs more than any soundbar you can buy, my whole room is calibrated as well as it can be. Although I agree it's not ideal. A 1,000 euro soundbar that has Dolby Atmos is 1/100 as good as a proper 5.1 system Sorry to answer your original question, speakers in a Dolby Atmos soundbar is not proper Dolby Atmos as much as you want to kid yourself it is because you have one. Soundbars are toys at the end of the day for people who can't afford a proper set-up or don't have room for one. I have one in the playroom, it's great for what it does but it's a toy.
Goose81 wrote: » Soundbars are toys at the end of the day for people who can't afford a proper set-up or don't have room for one. I have one in the playroom, it's great for what it does but it's a toy.
Cyrus wrote: » I have room for a proper set up and I can afford it yet what I have is a Sonos set up with a play bar subwoofer and two play ones , because it sounds good enough abs it’s way less hassle. You obviously are into av which is fine but you aren’t coming across the best in this exchange.