EagererBeaver wrote: » Because it's the cheapest one they'll have on the shelf, not for any mixology reasons.
cloudatlas wrote: » A lot of bar staff seem to use Paddy's for hot toddy's.
degzs wrote: » What whiskey makes a good hot whiskey? Has anyone tired any of the Jameson caskmates in a hot one ?
Nijmegen wrote: » If Irish whiskey goes the way of bourbon in recent years the discussion of what goes into what will become hyper sensitive as everyone tries to get a bottle of the ‘famed, rare, now $100 a bottle black bush’ from something similar with a different label. Meanwhile I’m sipping a good ole reliable bottle of Wild Turkey Rarebreed... also got some Lustau edition Redbreast on the go. Like cheese and chalk but lovely in their own ways.
odyssey06 wrote: 5% - 26 Year Old Single Malt Ex-Sherry Butt 27.5% - 11 Year Old Single Malt 27.5% - 15 Year Old Single Malt 40% - 7 Year Old Single Grain I think Bruichladdich have a QR Code you can scan for similar, or even lower level data.
the beer revolu wrote: » I think I might know where this idea comes from. Originally they wanted to put a breakdown of a blend on the label. Eg. 50% 3 year old grain , 40% 8 year old malt and 10% 10 year old rye. (made up figures as an example) This wasn't allowed as you can't mention 10 year old whiskey on the label unless the youngest component is 10 years old.
Quackster wrote: » Agree 110%. At the risk of further raising temperatures on this thread, I must say I'm a big fan of the rebrand! By way of comparison, Powers 70cl is €16 duty-free at Dublin Airport.
Ivefoundgod wrote: » Thats actually mentioned in the article by Louise where she gives a scenario of blended whiskey, its not clear from it if its an EU rule or an Irish one.
Quackster wrote: » Picked up two bottles of Powers for €18 a pop in Dunnes. Used a €10 off €40 spend voucher so effectively paid €13.50 a bottle. What a time to be alive!
the beer revolu wrote: Originally they wanted to put a breakdown of a blend on the label. Eg. 50% 3 year old grain , 40% 8 year old malt and 10% 10 year old rye. (made up figures as an example) This wasn't allowed as you can't mention 10 year old whiskey on the label unless the youngest component is 10 years old.
Ivefoundgod wrote: » Hmm, not sure I buy that. Louise McGuane who's quoted in the article says nothing about it but does mention revenue issues around becoming a bonder and asking for the technical file to be updated to include bonders. I suspect the interviewer asked her because the very next paragraph is Aidan Forde from Torc Brewery/Killarney Distillery company complaining about misleading labelling.
Cazale wrote: » I think they were going to tell the provenance and makeup of some of their liquid on their labels but were told not to by customs.
Ivefoundgod wrote: » What are your thoughts on JJ Corry labelling themselves as a bonder only as per the article at the weekend? I wouldn't mind it if they were a bit more upfront in explaining where its sourced from.
Nicks delight wrote: » Powers is a severely underestimated whiskey...no longer referred to as the working class whiskey. That was a SUPER deal you got.:D
Ivefoundgod wrote: What are your thoughts on JJ Corry labelling themselves as a bonder only as per the article at the weekend? I wouldn't mind it if they were a bit more upfront in explaining where its sourced from.
the beer revolu wrote: » What? A company with distillery in the name who don't have a distillery? Never! What next? Companies that don't distil having a "master distiller"? There's another scenario, too. Source your whisky for several years, then put in a little distillery which does actually produce whiskey, but then continue to source the majority of your whiskey, But, we have a distillery!
kjbsrah1 wrote: » Hi I missed that. Where was it on offer? Its a whiskey I am keen to try myself.
Indestructable wrote: » I have to say I was quite taken with the Lambay whiskey finished in cognac casks, it definitely added something unique. It was posted here a few weeks back on offer at 30 euro, so thanks for that.