The Great Reset

Lex Luthor wrote: »

I said its possible as the technology is there

But you've been proven wrong because it's not possible to track nanotechnology RFID without an RFID reader which needs to be placed in very close proximity to the RFID tag.
Provide a link to show it's possible over a wider range or your credibility drops further...if that's possible.

aido79 wrote: »

Would you work in a covid19 ward without a mask?

I doubt they would let me in, but if they would it wouldnt bother me

according to you I'd be safe because everyone else is masked up

Lex Luthor wrote: »

its been covered already, read back and check the mask thread

No... I shouldn't have to track multiple threads if you're pushing a claim...

Lex Luthor wrote: »

Its not that difficult to find information like this if you use your keyboard for other purposes than repeating yourself on here

https://www.armytimes.com/news/your-army/2018/05/18/soldiers-may-soon-have-implantable-health-monitors-and-robotic-surgeries-done-remotely/

"Command posts in the near future will have medical capabilities integrated within them, so patients can be monitored and calls made to a surgeon to recommend life-saving procedures."

Christ alive. This article has nothing to do with tracking people from thousands of miles away. It's about soldiers having devices either external or internal that monitor them.

The way this would work would be the soldier scanning their wrist each day and the information being stored. Or a soldier could have their readings sent to a doctor during say an operation in a post on the front lines even if those monitors weren't available.

It's a Fitbit for soldiers. Not some in-the-body system that can instantly notify command of a medical emergency deep within enemy lines.

If your hot take is that a vaccination could contain your comical misinterpretation of the article, I'd recommend re-evaluating some things in your life.

Lex Luthor wrote: »

2 weeks ago nobody was wearing them in crowded outdoor areas as the concept was outside was ok
Then the narrative is you should wear them in outside places
What happens next, the majority start wearing them in outside places

Well that is an outright lie. Most people on Grafton and Henry streets have been wearing them outdoors in crowds for quite a while.

Lex Luthor wrote: »

I doubt they would let me in, but if they would it wouldnt bother me

according to you I'd be safe because everyone else is masked up

And if everyone wasn't wearing a mask like you'd seem to prefer. Would you still work there?

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

It hasn't though, who is forcing you to wear one?

nobody, but thats not my point

the majority of people in this country and all over the world are wearing masks after they were told or requested by their respective governments they should wear them

Fighting Tao wrote: »

Well that is an outright lie. Most people on Grafton and Henry streets have been wearing them outdoors in crowds for quite a while.

Grafton St hasnt been crowded in a while

The amount of people wearing masks after meehole martin said people should wear them outside in crowded places about 2 weeks ago has increased

prior to August it wasnt requested or recommeneded or suggested, to wear masks in shops, then it was and everyone wore them

I'LL SAY IT AGAIN
THE MAJORITY OF PEOPLE ARE WEARING MASKS BECAUSE THEY ARE BEING "TOLD" TO WEAR THEM

Lex Luthor wrote: »

nobody, but thats not my point

the majority of people in this country and all over the world are wearing masks after they were told or requested by their respective governments they should wear them

Okay and in your view do those masks do something to reduce the spread of Covid, or they do nothing to reduce it?

Poorside

Lex Luthor wrote: »

Grafton St hasnt been crowded in a while

The amount of people wearing masks after meehole martin said people should wear them outside in crowded places about 2 weeks ago has increased

prior to August it wasnt requested or recommeneded or suggested, to wear masks in shops, then it was and everyone wore them

I'LL SAY IT AGAIN
THE MAJORITY OF PEOPLE ARE WEARING MASKS BECAUSE THEY ARE BEING "TOLD" TO WEAR THEM

Oh, all caps, it must be true so.

Lex Luthor wrote: »

nobody, but thats not my point

the majority of people in this country and all over the world are wearing masks after they were told or requested by their respective governments they should wear them

They were not told to though, it was explained how masks can and do reduce the chances if infection and of spreading the virus.

The majority understand this and choose to wear masks, a few idiots cannot understand how it works and choose not to.

So no conspiracy when it comes to masks?

Lex Luthor wrote: »

Grafton St hasnt been crowded in a while

The amount of people wearing masks after meehole martin said people should wear them outside in crowded places about 2 weeks ago has increased

prior to August it wasnt requested or recommeneded or suggested, to wear masks in shops, then it was and everyone wore them

I'LL SAY IT AGAIN
THE MAJORITY OF PEOPLE ARE WEARING MASKS BECAUSE THEY ARE BEING "TOLD" TO WEAR THEM

You realise that adding this makes your posts about 50% more idiotic than usual.right? :rolleyes:

Deleted User wrote: »

"Command posts in the near future will have medical capabilities integrated within them, so patients can be monitored and calls made to a surgeon to recommend life-saving procedures."

Christ alive. This article has nothing to do with tracking people from thousands of miles away. It's about soldiers having devices either external or internal that monitor them.

The way this would work would be the soldier scanning their wrist each day and the information being stored. Or a soldier could have their readings sent to a doctor during say an operation in a post on the front lines even if those monitors weren't available.

It's a Fitbit for soldiers. Not some in-the-body system that can instantly notify command of a medical emergency deep within enemy lines.

If your hot take is that a vaccination could contain your comical misinterpretation of the article, I'd recommend re-evaluating some things in your life.

I'm glad at least you accept that the technology is there to do what I had said it would
What I said was that there was technology out there that can be used for certain purposes
too many people put 2+2=5

Lex Luthor wrote: »

Grafton St hasnt been crowded in a while

The amount of people wearing masks after meehole martin said people should wear them outside in crowded places about 2 weeks ago has increased

prior to August it wasnt requested or recommeneded or suggested, to wear masks in shops, then it was and everyone wore them

I'LL SAY IT AGAIN
THE MAJORITY OF PEOPLE ARE WEARING MASKS BECAUSE THEY ARE BEING "TOLD" TO WEAR THEM

So what's the conspiracy? What do you know about mask wearing that hasn't been disclosed? Do they contain nanotechnology?

aido79 wrote: »

And if everyone wasn't wearing a mask like you'd seem to prefer. Would you still work there?

absolutely

Lex Luthor wrote: »

I'm glad at least you accept that the technology is there to do what I had said it would
What I said was that there was technology out there that can be used for certain purposes
too many people put 2+2=5

No it isn't, your own link said it may be available in the future, just admit that you lied about something you obviously have no idea about.

Lex Luthor wrote: »

Grafton St hasnt been crowded in a while

The amount of people wearing masks after meehole martin said people should wear them outside in crowded places about 2 weeks ago has increased

prior to August it wasnt requested or recommeneded or suggested, to wear masks in shops, then it was and everyone wore them

I'LL SAY IT AGAIN
THE MAJORITY OF PEOPLE ARE WEARING MASKS BECAUSE THEY ARE BEING "TOLD" TO WEAR THEM

Your ignorance is showing again about Grafton St. While it is not at the Xmas week elbow to elbow jammed, it is still very busy. Most have been wearing masks there for way longer than the 2 weeks you mentioned. I know because I am on it regularly. So don’t try to push that lie on me.

Lex Luthor wrote: »

I'm glad at least you accept that the technology is there to do what I had said it would
What I said was that there was technology out there that can be used for certain purposes
too many people put 2+2=5

Says the man doing 2+not reading a book=grand conspiracy.

Dohnjoe wrote: »

Okay and in your view do those masks do something to reduce the spread of Covid, or they do nothing to reduce it?

In my opinion the risk v benefit of wearing a mask doesnt justify wearing one

Lex Luthor wrote: »

I'LL SAY IT AGAIN
THE MAJORITY OF PEOPLE ARE WEARING MASKS BECAUSE THEY ARE BEING "TOLD" TO WEAR THEM

Most people are wearing masks because we know it reduces the risk of spreading the virus. Keyword: most.

There's a minority who don't want to wear masks, so rules have to be made.

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

They were not told to though, it was explained how masks can and do reduce the chances if infection and of spreading the virus.

The majority understand this and choose to wear masks, a few idiots cannot understand how it works and choose not to.

So no conspiracy when it comes to masks?

covered already in the mask forum but got banned because somebody didnt like my opinion

Lex Luthor wrote: »

In my opinion the risk v benefit of wearing a mask doesnt justify wearing one

What's the risk of wearing a mask?

Just to get this straight - you believe that masks do nothing to reduce the spread of an airborne disease?

Lex Luthor wrote: »

absolutely

So you would have no problem with contracting covid19 and possibly passing it to someone who may be vulnerable and might not survive?
I'm not sure many people could live with themselves knowing they were responsible for someone's death which could have very easily been avoided but obviously you could so that says a lot about you.

Lex Luthor wrote: »

covered already in the mask forum but got banned because somebody didnt like my opinion

Has it ever occurred to you that you might be wrong..

Lex Luthor wrote: »

In my opinion the risk v benefit of wearing a mask doesnt justify wearing one

What is the risk of wearing a mask? So far everything you've claimed has been proven to be nonsense fyi.

So what about the great reset? Do you know anything about it Lex? Anything at all, or is it all huff and puff on other topics because you know nothing about the great reset?

Lex Luthor wrote: »

covered already in the mask forum but got banned because somebody didnt like my opinion

Yeah, I have never read nor posted in the mask forum so for those of us who may have missed it why not post the conspiracy here for us to discuss (in the conspiracy forum) or post a link to your post where you explained the theory?

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

They were not told to though, it was explained how masks can and do reduce the chances if infection and of spreading the virus.

It was explained that people should wear masks in outdoor crowded places

If the majority take that as gospel and law, then thats up to them

and as people have shown by their actions by wearing them more since that speech, then it proves that they are wearing them because of what he said

aido79 wrote: »

So what's the conspiracy? What do you know about mask wearing that hasn't been disclosed? Do they contain nanotechnology?

you'd have to ask Susan down the street who's making them for her friends & relatives what she's doing