unkel wrote: » The only application for hydrogen is if you can make it practically for free with overproduction of renewable electricity that really, really can not go anywhere else - used directly, stored in EVs, or in other home and grid attached batteries, in pumped hydro, stored heat or stored hot water, even almost given away for free to other countries via interconnectors In that case the lamentable efficiency of the process of making hydrogen is not really relevant, as the source is pretty much free, abundant and of course renewable
kanuseeme wrote: » LOL thats crap, is the 3kWh including losses making the H2 from water or methane? or just 3 kWh worth of H2 makes only 1kWh ? LOL thats not going to come to market unless then can get it for nothing. Fuel cells can run on methane as well, from what I remember, something like an 600 c operating temp and 8 year life span. :D:D
garo wrote: » Hydrogen is only good for very specific applications. Things like high temperature furnaces where electricity cannot generate a high enough temperature. Or possibly ships and aeroplanes where batteries would be much heavier than the fuel cell + fuel. Though honestly ships could be plastered with PV panels and recharge their batteries that way.
graememk wrote: » There is Telehandlers either on the market or very near right now that are electric powered. Seen a post about electric tractors somewhere but they are still only the tiny ones, Its a step in the right direction. Working time will be an issue because when you need it, you need it. usually due to a brief window of good weather. Our tractors can burn 18-20L / hr when working hard in the summer. Maybe we'll end up with a 150 -300KW DC charger at most farmyards - We do stop for lunch, Tea, etc... My nearest three phase is about a mile away, or 3 if you follow the actual power line we are on. Or even some sort of Battery storage in the yard, charge them with A load of solar panels or cheap night electric.
graememk wrote: » Seen a post about electric tractors somewhere but they are still only the tiny ones, Its a step in the right direction.
ELM327 wrote: » You could have 3 phase 22kW going for 9 hours overnight to store the energy along with daily solar topping it up and connect it to a 150kW charger.
graememk wrote: » Also Long days people get tired and make mistakes, which are generally just costly but could end up being much worse. Machines can be fixed/replaced, People cant.
cruisey1987 wrote: » Being a jackeen from Dublin, I've almost no knowledge about tractors, but it seemed like it was a 'normal' size tractor They claimed it had around 5 hours of working power, which is apparently a typical daily workload. Seemed a bit low to me, however if you had a decent 3 phase power supply on a farm you could plug in for an hour or so in the middle of the day and probably gain back 50% battery power, which would carry you over another 2.5 hours
unkel wrote: » You're a bit behind This yoke runs on electricity, generated by itself. It is loaded with stuff at the top of the quarry, regen charges it batteries going down the quarry with a full load, then only uses a part of that to travel back up to the top empty. Never have to charge it. At night it powers the mining village. Saves 50 million liters of diesel per year.
Merrion wrote: » A lot of the fuel use of a tractor is "lost" in torque reduction - whereas an electric motor has its highest torque at zero rpm so electric tractors would be very different vehicles. (Which is good because current tractors are causing terrible soil compaction issues)
cruisey1987 wrote: » On the topic of electric tractors, would they stop being tractor shaped (2 big wheels, 2 small ones) The advantage seems clear with a diesel engine to gain massive amounts of torque. With electric the advantage isn't so clear, would it make more sense to have something that looks more like an oversized quad bike and engines on each axle? I imagine there would be a running cost advantage to having smaller tyres, plus a more stable platform would make it safer to operate
cruisey1987 wrote: » Bit of a tangent, but I heard a similar argument regarding electric intercity buses. Someone pointed out they only need around 500km of range because the driver is legally obliged to take a break then anyway As frustrating as it is, sometimes imposing breaks on people is a good thing, especially when it reduces the risk of accidents with a piece of heavy machinery
cruisey1987 wrote: » Yeah I saw an article ages ago about an electric tractor. Can't remember where I saw it unfortunately so can't post a link
unkel wrote: » This yoke runs on electricity, generated by itself...........Saves 50 million liters of diesel per year.
graememk wrote: » gotta get the PTO power from somewhere...
graememk wrote: » But Electric tractors wont sort the Soil Compaction, that's a whole other ball game.
Merrion wrote: » Autonomous swarms of small electric tractors would do. A lot of the reason tractors got so big is to maximise the amount each driver can do - remove the driver and you can just go with many rather than bigger. Plus - of course - farms have huge potential for electricity generation with PV on all the shed roofs and small windmills on field boundaries.
ELM327 wrote: » I still think H2 is a wasteful use of energy as it's less efficient than an efficient fossil fuel engine. However if it's a way to use excess energy that would otherwise be switched off then that's of course good. Battery storage would be possible too though, and such ferries already exist in Norway.
timsey tiger wrote: » That's great for short hops. How large would the battery be to get you across an ocean. Remember ships measure their fuel consumption in tonnes.:eek:
liamog wrote: » We don't have to solve every scenario on day 1
Kramer wrote: » Electric "JCB"s are entirely doable though, just need a decent 3 phase farm supply as previously said. Think his one went cheap enough on Done Deal - went to a small farmer in West Clare who wanted something green to open a few dykes . Details here:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Brutus :pac:.