For Forks Sake wrote: » Where do they find these morons, let alone get them elected?https://www.independent.ie/news/sinn-fein-td-admits-calling-to-party-members-homes-when-he-disagreed-with-social-media-posts-39845642.html
For Forks Sake wrote: » Where do they find these morons, let alone get them elected?https://www.independent.ie/news/sinn-fein-td-admits-calling-to-party-:)members-homes-when-he-disagreed-with-social-media-posts-39845642.html
Mr Browne said that since he became involved with Sinn Féin in 1980 he had gone to members’ doors “to have discussions” about the party, saying: “It was me going to another party member and having a discussion, whether it was a disagreement or an agreement or something or trying to come to a consensus or something. I would never have even think of it as being intimidatory.”
McMurphy wrote: » Dear lord, I really need to "expand" on who "you guys" are? Here's a clue, Bishop posted something in this thread about Twitter, and how his account wasn't trending, you followed up with a similar post also in this thread.Go on Christy, engage the brain, you can do it horse........
McMurphy wrote: » Sorry, I thought when you mentioned "trending" you were referencing Twitter, as bishop had also done shortly before you. (That'd explain "lumping you in" too) I didn't think that would need further clarification, but boards never ceases to amaze me.Bye bye Christy.
FrancieBrady wrote: » Hold on, I'll ask the man with his finger on the pulse. Brendi, could you ask your 'source' to define 'imminent'? Asking for a friend.
FrancieBrady wrote: » If he doesn't see the need to resign on Friday or before (it has been 'imminent' since last week according to Brendi's source) then it will be others dragging it out. Leo and Helen McEntee were left alone after their Dáil appearances.
christy c wrote: » Drag out this story? Yeah seems to have died down a bit to be fair, SF seemed to stop shooting itself in the foot. I think Stanley is going to address the Dail so maybe they'll make a balls of that too?
McMurphy wrote: » Christy, it was an off the cuff remark following on from the twitter references, holy moly, don't take everything literally. If I posted for you to "pull up your socks" would you be bent over tugging on the mid calfs? I don't understand what you mean by this? Are you asking if Stanley's likely to resign in the next week or two?
christy c wrote: » Yes I mentioned trending and therefore Twitter. I haven't tweeted in about a year I'd say, so before posting anything about me tweeting please engage that brain as you said yourself.
Anyway do you think SF will manage to knock another week or 2 out of this?
FrancieBrady wrote: » Drag what out? Bar chat on here, hardly heard it mentioned for most of yesterday and today. Alan Kelly, Michael Martin and McDowell seem to be the political figures trending negative feedback today. I would expect Brexit will knock it for six as a news story tomorrow, and maybe even Friday if the news is bad from Brussels.
christy c wrote: » I read that earlier myself. Do you think SF will manage to drag it out for another week or 2?
McMurphy wrote: » Sorry, I thought when you mentioned "trending" you were referencing Twitter, as bishop had also done shortly before you. (That'd explain "lumping you in" too) I didn't think that would need further clarification, but boards never ceases to amaze me. Bye bye Christy.
christy c wrote: » Why are you lumping me in with him? Why did you reference tweeting when replying to me?
christy c wrote: » Yep, he certainly was trending. I wonder are we getting near the end of this chapter or will SF manage to drag it out for another week or 2 somehow?
McMurphy wrote: » And now he's not, yet Varadkar still is/was as demonstrated earlier today, how many days after the news broke? Do any of you guys think anything through before tweeting posting?
McMurphy wrote: » Dear lord, I really need to "expand" on who "you guys" are? Here's a clue, Bishop posted something about Twitter, and how his account wasn't trending, you followed up with a similar post. Go on Christy, you can do it........
christy c wrote: » I was asking about this Stanley affair. Some people have criticised Varadkar for getting involved. Anyway, please expand on the "you guys" and tweeting rubbish.
McMurphy wrote: » Are you seriously asking me who came out worse Leo Varadkar, as Taoiseach of the state was caught passing on confidential documents to his friend because his friend asked him to. Or, shock horror, a Sinn Fein TD tweeted something about the IRA :eek: You're trying to yank my chain christy, aren't you?
christy c wrote: » Who's you guys? My opinions are my own and I tweet stuff once in a blue moon. Who do you think came out worse out of this? Varadkar or SF?
McMurphy wrote: » And now he's not, yet Varadkar still is, how many days after the news broke? Do any of you guys think anything through before tweeting posting?
Brendan Bendar wrote: » It appears Stanno going to fall on his sword regarding PAC. That seems imminent, sources say. Unable to get definite confirmation, but inside sources have indicated in that direction.
Bonniedog wrote: » It's okay. Sinn Féin are not nationalist or republican anymore. The SDLP and FF with rainbow flags Gas to hear Shinners and Gaelers squabbling over stuff when they agree on almost everything: subservience to EU, abortion, transgender gibberish, mass immigration, Partition, corporation tax, privatisation (in north), the lockdown, and so on and so forth.
Bowie wrote: » Weren't SF actively and openly criticising government over the treatment of immigrants and direct provision centers? Don't SF advocate for anyone born on the island being Irish? Wasn't it FG courting the woman who wanted re-education centers for immigrants for support? I won't get into the similarities between Trump/Johnson and FG, (such as FG using the Tories very own election PR team).
McMurphy wrote: » Now you're confusing a tweet with a trend. Stanley might have been trending on Twitter, but his account/profile wasn't the trend. Just stop. :pac:
Bishop of hope wrote: » Well it was trending strongly then whoosh, gone.
McMurphy wrote: » A twitter account isn't a twitter trend FFS. Jeez bish, pretend to know what you're talking about at least when attempting a funny one.