The Vaccine

There is insufficient data for the FDA to conclude how safe the vaccine is in children under 16, pregnant women and people with compromised immune systems.

hmmmmm

ceegee

Lex Luthor wrote: »

There is insufficient data for the FDA to conclude how safe the vaccine is in children under 16, pregnant women and people with compromised immune systems.

hmmmmm

No sh*t. The study excluded children under 16,pregnant women and people with compromised immune systems.
As is standard.

Lex Luthor wrote: »

There is insufficient data for the FDA to conclude how safe the vaccine is in children under 16, pregnant women and people with compromised immune systems.

hmmmmm

As a person with a compromised immune system, I have every intention of getting the vaccine. The key reason being that coronavirus is far more of a risk than any vaccine. Reading like faux concern from you tbh.

Lex Luthor wrote: »

There is insufficient data for the FDA to conclude how safe the vaccine is in children under 16, pregnant women and people with compromised immune systems.

hmmmmm

Ok? So are the FDA not in on the conspiracy?
Do you agree with the FDA's conclusions about the vaccine being safe for other people outside that group? Or do you only accept what they say when it can be used against the vaccine?

people with allergies to food & medicines now are being recommended to not take it

Timberrrrrrrr

Lex Luthor wrote: »

people with allergies to food & medicines now are being recommended to not take it

My sister had an allergic reaction to aspirin, I had an allergy to the flu jab one year, I know a lad that is allergic to palmolive soap. People can have a reaction to ANYTHING! Two people have had a bad reaction, how many have taken the vaccine and had no reaction at all?

time will tell

Hands up who's taking it when its offered?
No questions asked

Lex Luthor wrote: »

There is insufficient data for the FDA to conclude how safe the vaccine is in children under 16, pregnant women and people with compromised immune systems.

hmmmmm

Constantly suspicious of medical science, but entertains absurd conspiracies..

Hmmmmm indeed.

The Nal

This sums it up for me

ceegee

Lex Luthor wrote: »

people with allergies to food & medicines now are being recommended to not take it

People with SIGNIFICANT allergies. Strange that the one word you omitted happened to be the one that made your sentence more sensationalist.

define a significant allergy as opposed to an allergy

Lex Luthor wrote: »

define a significant allergy as opposed to an allergy

Sorry to press this, but can you answer some of the many questions asked about the many conspiracies you've suggested..

Is there a reason you can't address those questions or?

Lex Luthor wrote: »

define a significant allergy as opposed to an allergy

A significant allergy would be if a person had a history of anaphylaxis as a result of an allergy. Insignificant are mild things like rashes etc that don't pose a risk to your health ultimately. This isn't the first time where allergies have been warned about in relation to a vaccine so no idea why you're viewing it as a big deal.

Lex Luthor wrote: »

time will tell

You keep saying this as if it helps your case.
It doesn't.
It's a cop out. You are just running away from points and questions you can't handle.

You have no rational reason to be afraid of the vaccine.

So why are you afraid of it?

I'm not afraid of it, I just dont need it

greenspurs

King Mob wrote: »

Why are you asking for this pedantic clarification?
Which of these figures do you believe is being inflated?

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

have you a source that quotes 2 different figures, one for death with Covid and one for death related to covid?

Lex Luthor wrote: »

I'm not afraid of it, I just dont need it

Bravo....

https://www.irishtimes.com/business/health-pharma/allergy-warning-on-pfizer-biontech-covid-vaccine-1.4431784

The 1st people that cant take the vaccine that wont harm you .

"A clinical trial of the Pfizer vaccine in 38,000 participants found that the most common reactions were reactions at the site of the injection, fatigue, headaches, muscle pain, chills joint pain and fever. “Severe adverse reactions occurred in 0.0% to 4.6% of participants, were more frequent after Dose 2 than after Dose 1” and were less frequent in those over 55 years of age, the Food and Drug Administration said on Tuesday."

The cure is worse than the 'virus'

i saw dis guy on youtube and he sed bill gates is tryin contrul us and we shud say no cuz our fredom is gone and big farma make us slave and the scence is rong nyway so i wont k bye

US2

I've an allergic reaction to eggs , missed out on alot of vacations growing up, looks like I can't take this one either. I'll just have to hope I'm one of the 99% of people who survive covid, if I actually get infected

silliussoddius

Deleted User wrote: »

i saw dis guy on youtube and he sed bill gates is tryin contrul us and we shud say no cuz our fredom is gone and big farma make us slave and the scence is rong nyway so i wont k bye

ur an angle fur littin uz no

greenspurs wrote: »

The 1st people that cant take the vaccine that wont harm you .

No one is claiming this. Nothing is 100% safe. All anti-vaxxers use this faulty notion as a crutch to attack vaccines.

People can suffer mild, average or strong effects from a vaccine, meaning they after the jab they can feel almost nothing, feel not great or some can feel sick for a day or two. A very small amount can even develop an injury and in rare cases, some people have even died as a result.

So when you start with the premise "Oh lol I thought vaccines can't harm anyone", that's false, and anyone with an ounce of basic knowledge knows this.

The cure is worse than the 'virus'

Which is not the case. Contracting Covid is far, far more dangerous than being inoculated against it.

Dohnjoe wrote: »

Contracting Covid is far, far more dangerous than being inoculated against it.

Any chance that crystal ball of yours has tonight’s lotto numbers?

ceegee wrote: »

People with SIGNIFICANT allergies. Strange that the one word you omitted happened to be the one that made your sentence more sensationalist.

Significant history of allergies is not the same as history of significant allergies

Lex Luthor wrote: »

Any chance that crystal ball of yours has tonight’s lotto numbers?

Lots of people die from infectious diseases.
Very, very, very few people die from the vaccines used to protect against them.

Is there any part of that you don't understand?

Dohnjoe wrote: »

Lots of people die from infectious diseases.
Very, very, very few people die from the vaccines used to protect against them.

Is there any part of that you don't understand?

You mentioned the COVID vaccine specifically, not in general

This vaccine is new technology so its like apples & oranges

Is there any part of that you don't understand?

runawaybishop

Lex Luthor wrote: »

You mentioned the COVID vaccine specifically, not in general

This vaccine is new technology so its like apples & oranges

Is there any part of that you don't understand?

Sorry, what's your point? Some people may be allergic to medicine. What's the conspiracy changed to now, it's hard to keep up when you move the goalposts after your nonsense is pointed out

Lex Luthor wrote: »

You mentioned the COVID vaccine specifically, not in general

Many of your views in this thread are so irrational it's actually difficult to follow them..

You don't seem to understand this vaccine or vaccines in general, but you appear to be terrified of them

You claim all these vast conspiracies are going on, but you can never provide any details of them

Covid has killed around 1.5 mm people in the last 9 months, but you seem to be far more worried about the common sense measures to curb it from spreading, and perplexed with simple notions like wearing a mask or social distancing

EyesClosed

I've been following this thread from the start and I'm lost now. What's the conspiracy exactly?
The vaccine is going to kill people? Or it isn't needed? Or both?