Gavin Chubby Asteroid wrote: » Watch some Karen videos on youtube, that's you!
Deleted User wrote: » I don't think the above posters realise that these are customised calenders. The customer sends their pictures and the calander is printed using these. The OP received someone else's calander with their family photos. And OP is concerned that their own personal photos may have been sent in calander form to another person. I would continue to annoy the hell out of the company, they don't seem to be taking this very seriously, when it's a pretty amazingly stupid mess up. They sound like they need to cop on to themselves, not the OP!
Barbara Fresh Vender wrote: » I am not a woman
Barbara Fresh Vender wrote: » There were normal pictures of my family (some under 12) on the beach in their togs. I would just like clarification that these pictures have been sent back to the company, and this doesn’t happen again. I don’t know who now possesses the images. I just don’t want this to happen for other families
eviltwin wrote: » If you are so worried about the content of the photos you sent why would you use them in the first place A mistake was made, it happens. What exactly do you want this company to do?
Bubbaclaus wrote: » The only result of escalating a complaint about this will be someone in the company getting fired for an innocent error.
ted1 wrote: » Or the company put in place policies so they don’t make such f@@k ups. If the policies aren’t in a pace then they can’t really be fired. The company could be fined for failing to report GDPR breaches
Barbara Fresh Vender wrote: » I don’t know whether to tell my family about the incident. Since it is their children in the pictures, I think that they have a right to know. I basically gathered our family WhatsApp pics, and made them into a calendar because my loved-one has cognitive impairment, and I thought that this would put a smile on her face. Now I feel stupid and wish that I got her some nice chocolates instead
Bubbaclaus wrote: » I don't think GDPR would apply here, unless you can point me to the exact part of the regulation that does, which I may have overlooked?
Barbara Fresh Vender wrote: » I agree. But this is not the employee’s fault at all! This is a problem with company procedure. They had a turnover of 180 million last year (they are not some small business aiming to make a living). They can afford to do a risk assessment. The poor employee was probably working a long day for pittance. The fact is that it happens regularly, the company is the one at fault
Jequ0n wrote: » You don’t know if it happens regularly, the employee might just have tried to calm you down