rounders wrote: » Covid. They are doing consultations over the phone and video call if you want one. There will be no in person ones or at least there is no plan at the moment unless a lot changes in the next month
neddynasty wrote: » Will be interesting to see if there is more or less feedback because it's virtual. I'm not sure I'd have known about it other than this thread.
The proposed M20 route that follows the N20 route is being strongly opposed by hundreds of Whitechurch residents who say the motorway could potentially rip communities apart and destroy family homes and farms.
A newly formed action group has been actively engaging on social media and through virtual meetings since the public consultation on the new motorway opened on November 19, 2020.
Cork Trucker wrote: » I get the feeling that the 'M20 Steering Group' has been formed.https://www.echolive.ie/corknews/M20-route-option-could-decimate-local-connectivity-say-residents-in-the-area-f97e60cd-5177-4766-ae62-fe872057aa09-ds#.X8_gWA9dEzg.twitter
marno21 wrote: » This shouldn't be too much of an issue. It's the blue (offline) route south of Mallow they are taking issue with. It would be daft if the existing N20 south of Mallow wasn't an online upgrade. It's a 15m+ wide road in places with earthworks complete. The alternative would be ferociously expensive.
Cork Trucker wrote: » I agree with what you’re saying, it’s wide enough in many places. Are they basically stating their case to keep it online? This thing will be costly enough without legal challenges
Isambard wrote: » if it's online, then surely it would not split communities and would be an improvement to now as suitable bridges and underpasses would have to be installed , which would keep their local journeys off the main roads
Cork Trucker wrote: » I get the feeling that the 'M20 Steering Group' has been formed. What makes me laugh......
E36Ross wrote: » Just been looking, Is they're any semi-detailed proposed routes? (Roughly the townlands they plan to go through?) Or do they first decide on which route and then plan it after that?
cjpm wrote: » It’s a public consultation. People are entitled to canvass for support for or against a particular route. Completely different to a few NIMBYs taking legal challenges to a selected route. Trucker you’re a great poster, but it’s bad form to go publishing their spokespersons details. Maybe you should consider editing the post. IMHO
Cork Trucker wrote: » Edited. However I have no control over any quotes that fbyhe original post.
cjpm wrote: » Fair play. We are all frustrated with the state of Cork roads but it must be 1000 times worse for truck drivers.
Cork Trucker wrote: » It is. I remember one time being stuck in traffic when heading back to the depot in Mallow to finish a shift, there was a car crash involving 3 vehicles between Ballygibbon & Rathduff, the delay was over 1 hour stuck in traffic due to diversions, stop/go etc. Frustrated is definitely one way to describe it, when it’s the main artery to/from work 5 days a week it’s a nightmare,
Isambard wrote: » wait until they start building it. I recall suffering the Nenagh bypass rebuilding to motorway standard online and it wasn't a picnic.
Bass Reeves wrote: » All because Tipp Co Council who did the by pass refused to do as requested by the NRA
Limerick74 wrote: » Can you please explain what you mean by the above post? Limerick were the lead authority for this project so not sure what Tipperrary could have done against the wishes of the NRA.
Cork Trucker wrote: » I've never been to Nenagh :pac: On a serious note though i can only imagine as it sounds similar to what happened with Watergrasshill when the bypass was "robbed" as some of the locals said in 2008
Isambard wrote: » completely off topic but last time I was that way, the village street had been re-opened to through traffic, rendering the expensive local bypasses pretty much redundant
cjpm wrote: » There is an online map that shows 2 500m wide corridors.Www.corklimerick.ie