jh79 wrote: » What info changed? There was never an indication of a problem with HPV. Fluoride too. There was no credible research that it was harmful.
FrancieBrady wrote: » SF did it? So FG FF are responsible for the opinions of all the people that say they will vote for them? Wow...interesting theory.
Bowie wrote: » Top level members of all parties have had vax/fluoride/5G issues. **** happens, we move on. Trying to get political mileage out of it is desperate.
jh79 wrote: » Undermining public health initiatives is not something i think we should just move on from. If she gets the vaccine live on tv and prevents SF social media from spreading misinformation on public health matters then it will be time to move on.
PearseCork92 wrote: » Despite what you might think I have no strong opinions on what Loyalist politicians might say or not say. I'm just having a bit of craic with people calling me a shinnerbot when I helpfully point out Fine Gael carved out a general election position on anti-fluoridation at a general election and even took it to the European parliament. Can we get any Fine Gael cheerleader here to put their hand up and admit that they were the monster raving looney anti-fluoride party not so long ago? Anyone?
Bowie wrote: » I don't believe FF/FG/SD/SF/PBP politicians asking questions is undermining anything. If they or their representatives have concerns they should be addressed. Is 'SF social media' FG spin for 'Liberal fake news media'? That's how that sounds. Can you link to any SF policy on not taking a vaccine? There is a constant effort by FG types trying to push the conspiracy theory that SF rule the opinions of any and every rando on social media. It's desperately poor behaviour from the FG mob/party. FG need up their standards of engagement if they hope to win back votes IMO.
Brendan Bendar wrote: » doubt if any serious posters here give a toss what your opinion is.
jh79 wrote: » What's your explanation as to why SF members on social media keep retweeting conspiracy theories that undermine public health matters? If they were being critical of them it wouldn't be an issue but all they are doing is helping them spread.
6 wrote: » Are they? Ffs Name and Shame
6 wrote: » Hey, it's 45% of SF polled that either will not take the vaccine or dont know. Embarrassing stuff tbh.
A united, if federated, Ireland is a realistic prospect, being forged each day on the ground by the Withdrawal Agreement, while the Scottish National Party is all-too-confident about another independence referendum. Granting it is a price Labour leader Keir Starmer will pay to be in government after the next election.
Nobotty wrote: » Interesting bit in a very interesting article from a Tory and former chancellor in the paper he Edits today Rest of the piece is also a good read on Brexit and bang on the money IMOhttps://www.standard.co.uk/comment/brexit-no-deal-brussels-eu-customs-union-b219100.html
jh79 wrote: » Ni Riada and Wynne are the most high profile. The rest were councillors. It was mostly back when they were less popular and fishing for votes in the looney left pond. It's more associated with the far right these days.
Fine Gael minister Brendan Griffin, SocDem leader Róisín Shortall, Sinn Féin TDs Pearse Doherty and Brian Stanley and Fianna Fáil TDs Robert Troy, Niamh Smyth and Pat Casey, who is now a senator, submitted parliamentary questions (PQs) about 5G's health impact. The wireless technology has been the subject of unfounded claims that it affects people's health in recent years and has more recently been falsely linked to the spread of Covid-19. The International Commission on Non-Ionising Radiation Protection says there is no evidence that 5G causes illnesses.
Fine Gael vice-president defends raising concerns about HPV vaccine – but says there is no need for review group to look into side effects John Paul Phelan is the second Junior Minister to backtrack on previous questions after Finian McGrath accepted the jab was a 'very important part' of Government policy
Brendan Bendar wrote: » How is Stanno’s week off going.. Strong rumours he’s toast in the next day or two..... #notanormalparty
Ireland2020 wrote: » Where are these rumours? Any links
Brendan Bendar wrote: » Rumours don’t usually have links.....:rolleyes:
Ireland2020 wrote: » Your making them up so
Bowie wrote: » You're trying hard to connect such things to SF. Why? Especially when... They don't cancel each other out by any means but this crusade to demonise SF voters is sour grapes and tacky quite frankly.
tikkahunter wrote: » Just shy of 200 posts in 5 days , very impressive. You will be be up to Francies 30k defending SF in no time Bud .
jh79 wrote: » At the time, FF went with the scientific advice and left fluoride alone. FG kept it too and not a mention of it since Leo took over. FG did a good job with the HPV vaccine turn around. Kate O C was good when dealing with Gino's medical marijuana bill. It's a pity her Cancer act targeting those selling quack cures for didn't get finished before the election. Increased VAT rate on vitamins was rightly defended by Leo They all do it to different extents but my experience is that SF are the worst for it.
Bowie wrote: » Fair enough. I disagree. "Ni Riada and Wynne are the most high profile. The rest were councillors." is hardly high profile government ministers.
Ireland2020 wrote: » 12 of your last 15 posts have been about SF in the SF thread. No opinions on anything else Strange that