smurgen wrote: » What anti vax stuff? Sounds like the usual straw clutching again.:) You realize Switzerland has put the breaks on vaccine approval for now? Citing incomplete data from the manufacturers. "Switzerland’s medical regulator Swissmedic says it lacks the necessary information to sign off on three different coronavirus vaccines ordered by the government."https://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/incomplete-data-stalls-swiss-authorisation-of-covid-19-vaccines/46196598
PearseCork92 wrote: » How about former FG junior minister John Paul Phelan?https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.thesun.ie/news/1488740/fine-gael-vice-president-defends-raising-concerns-about-hpv-vaccine-but-says-there-is-no-need-for-review-group-to-look-into-side-effects-health/amp/
Phelan, Minister for Local Government and Electoral Reform, refused to stand by his call for a review group. He told the Irish Sun: “A woman contacted me because her daughter was ill sometime after having received the vaccine.“Personally speaking I am happy to believe the medical evidence which is to state the vaccine saves lives. “Ninety per cent of what a politician does is raise issues of constituents. You don’t have to believe or disbelieve what you are being asked. Your job is to raise it.”On the symptoms he highlighted, he replied:“From the point of view of the lay person there are similarities. But every medical expert is of the view it is not related to HPV. And the potential benefits of taking the vaccine are hugely significant. I am not in a position to argue with any medical expert about anything.“I am not in a position to demand any review be set up if the people who administer public health in the country are of a particular view. In a sense, the question was asked blindly as a representation for a family I know well.
For Forks Sake wrote: » Did you actually read the article?
micosoft wrote: » Of course he didn't. 14 posts in but has a repertoire of whataboutery posts from other parties two decades ago to avoid discussing SF today.
[Deleted User] wrote: » Matt Carthy on CB Live tonight was priceless. When asked about anti vax and fluoride, immediately brought up student nurses not being paid and in a later breath accused Kate O'Connell/FG of deflection :rolleyes: Good to see they have members who can read and implement the playbook.
PearseCork92 wrote: » I love the way you highlight him backpeddling after being raked over the coals as if he wasn't casting doubt on the vaccine in the first instance. Another FG genius Mary Mitchell O'Connor said that she received a text from a GP saying that she wouldn't allow her daughter take the same vaccine. You can find it on record if you care to look. If being a vaccine skeptic and anti-water fluoridation maketh a party of numpties, the boys and girls in blue need not look too far outside their own party. And if pointing out this amusing reality makes me a shinnerbot in your eyes, then a shinnerbot I be.
astrofool wrote: » But you know they will likely approve them once they get that data, right? Are you implying that Switzerland is anti vax?
For Forks Sake wrote: » https://twitter.com/NextIrishGE/status/1332852770920132610
Deleted User wrote: » Matt Carthy on CB Live tonight was priceless. When asked about anti vax and fluoride, immediately brought up student nurses not being paid and in a later breath accused Kate O'Connell/FG of deflection :rolleyes: Good to see they have members who can read and implement the playbook.
6 wrote: » Is that a reliable poll? Why are a large portion of SF supporters anti vaxxers? Assuming it's an educational issue?
smurgen wrote: » As one poster said of Switzerland they will likely approve once they get the data
6 wrote: » No party wants to be labeled anti vaxxers. That would be disastrous.
smurgen wrote: » But they're not. That's on other people labelling them that.
Ireland2020 wrote: » https://twitter.com/MaryLouMcDonald/status/1336218281913573377?s=19 The Anti Vaccine party have spoken
FrancieBrady wrote: » Kate O'Connell on Primetime...is that the best FG have? Disastrous performance. Reduced to muttering 'anti science...anti science at the end'. Carthy was good and on message...what is currently important, not some old ****e about flouride. !
FrancieBrady wrote: » Kate O'Connell on Primetime...is that the best FG have? Disastrous performance. Reduced to muttering 'anti science...anti science at the end'. Carthy was good and on message...what is currently important, not some old ****e about flouride. Most anti vaxxers are young and SF have the young vote seems to me be why they are higher than FG and FF. Mary Lou was spot on saying that they need to work at informing and convinced those with concerns...not pillory people and demean, like some do. But Kate O'Connell! Senior camogie folks senior camogie, don't be sending them out there without a hurley!
McMurphy wrote: » I thought Kate O'Connell lost her seat in the last election, why are FG choosing to send out someone who was clearly rejected by the electorate to go toe to toe with Carthy?