Wantedbymany wrote: » Where is the pandemic ??I would love to know ????look across the world what is happening, but you will not see it on mainstream media because it's the truth Berlin 2million on the streets
GT89 wrote: » The amount of excess deaths vs the amount of covid deaths
King Mob wrote: » Ok. That's a very specific claim. What evidence do you have that the vaccine was "there for years"? Do you also subscribe to the silly idea the virus was created? What id the overall plan for this "Plandemic"?
Wantedbymany wrote: » Where is the pandemic ?
Wantedbymany wrote: » COVID IS NOT NATURAL
Wantedbymany wrote: » Charles lieber paid to manufacture your so called virus to disperse protesters in China back when the people rebelled against the new government that was forced upon them by the military coup government that got in to place
Timberrrrrrrr wrote: » The pharma companies have said the vaccine will be not for profit as long as the pandemic is ongoing.
King Mob wrote: » Yes it is. Conspiracy theorists like yourself keep claiming this, but you've offered nothing to support this bizarre and untrue claim.
jackboy wrote: » The real question is, was the virus outbreak directly from nature or was the virus released from a lab by accident? .
Wantedbymany wrote: » How to you mean not for profit ?the us government is paying 2billon for the FIRST batch they get as well as many other country's around this green rock we live on IT WILL BE FREE FOR PEOPLE TO GET BUT INDIRECTLY PAYED FOR BY THE PEOPLE
King Mob wrote: » Not really. This is only a question to conspiracy theorists in the same way "is the earth flat" is a question. The virus is natural. There's been no evidence to the contrary. The person I was quoting seems to be of the opinion the virus is entirely artificial. We all know that this is completely false. The real question I've been asking is "What's the real death rate and how is this number verified." Yet no conspiracy theorist seems to want to answer this question.
jackboy wrote: » The virus could be completely natural and have been released from a lab. The source of the virus has not been conclusively proven.
King Mob wrote: » No, it has been shown to be natural. All medical organizations have conformed that it is a natural virus and none support the idea that it is not. There's been no evidence to show otherwise. And again, I was responding to a poster who was claiming the virus was artificial. Do you believe the virus is artificial? The question however remains. Do you personally believe that the number of covid deaths is being exaggerated?
jackboy wrote: » I keep suggesting that it may have been a natural virus released from a lab. The medical organisations saying that it is a natural virus are not saying that it wasn’t released from a lab. They don’t know where it came from.
jackboy wrote: » To answer your question about the Covid deaths we would need a definition of a covid death. There are many potential definitions.
King Mob wrote: » Nope. The definition is pretty clear. A covid death is a death caused by covid. Do you believe that the numbers are being inflated? Please don't do the usual conspiracy theorist thing and dodge questions. They are simple and direct ones.
jackboy wrote: » Your wrong about the definition. Deaths are reported as, deaths from Covid, deaths with Covid or deaths related to Covid. There is not clarity.
Deaths with COVID-19 on the death certificate by area Total number of deaths since the start of the pandemic of people whose death certificate mentioned COVID-19 as one of the causes. The data are published weekly by the ONS, NRS and NISRA and there is a lag in reporting of at least 11 days because the data are based on death registrations. Only data available for the latest reported date are shown.
King Mob wrote: » You're dodging questions now. From eariler.https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/details/deaths Do you believe that this number is being inflated. Yes or no? Do you believe that the virus was artificially created? Yes or no? Do you believe that this is a valid possibility? Yes or no? If you dodge again, there's no point trying to continue discussing.
jackboy wrote: » Your gas, I mentioned the possibility that the virus was natural but maybe released from a lab. I never suggested that the virus was artificially created. I have never said that the virus is anything other than natural. Then you start going on about flat earths and aliens. I don’t know about the numbers being inflated or not because definition of a covid death varies country to country and also over time. Realistically, it will probably take years of research to get a good picture of how many died from covid. The definition you showed me is actually as clear as mud.
Harika wrote: » Show evidence of that please.
Wantedbymany wrote: » You may not be able to watch this but here goes
Wantedbymany wrote: » Another screen shot
Wantedbymany wrote: » London
Wantedbymany wrote: » https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/harvard-university-professor-and-two-chinese-nationals-charged-three-separate-china-related before COVID became a huge thing that government page said files of sars cvd19
AMKC wrote: » How could it have said Covid 19 do because it was the WHO who named it that and only after it came out not the Chinese so that has to be fake.
Wantedbymany wrote: » It said Sars cvd19
Wantedbymany wrote: » Who is the world health organisation? Founders ?main people ? President?
Charles lieber paid to manufacture your so called virus to disperse protesters in China back when the people rebelled against the new government that was forced upon them by the military coup government that got in to place
Dohnjoe wrote: » You previously wrote: What's your evidence for that?
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w8.vanillicon.com/v2/867a9f20e705add43a3ada2e4f4480cc.svg)
