markodaly wrote: » Having the odd comparison is one thing, but every post of yours is pretty much an attempt to distract from the issues at hand for SF. You post more about FG and FF than SF in the SF thread. Says it all.
FrancieBrady wrote: » People use comparisons in debates about political parties...another shocking revelation. .
Suckit wrote: » Speaking of well paid.. I'm guessing it's just a coincidence that a prominent FG poster 'disappeared' from here and 4 or 5 posters appear in his place?
Kraftwerk wrote: » If you want to go down that road 20% of posts in this thread are from one poster. That's close to 1500 posts in this thread defending SF or an average of 360 posts a month in 1 thread! If anyone deserves a few days off at Christmas it's the Shinners...
Jinglejangle69 wrote: » Well in fairness its well known they are paid by HQ to post here, but weldone on the observation.
Jinglejangle69 wrote: » None of the SF lads who post here constantly defending SF are in the student nurses thread criticising the government except for one. Really telling. If they really cared about the citizens and nurses like they claim they would be in that thread putting even half the amount of effort in that they do supporting SF here. Defend at all costs.
FrancieBrady wrote: » It's neither illegal or a big deal jingle. Certainly triggered you though.
Jinglejangle69 wrote: » Yeah anyway. So Brid and you have no evidence of her claim. More accusations and ranting that leads to nothing. How's that Garda investigation going into Leo you told us all to "watch this space" for?? Hilarious:) Boring..
FrancieBrady wrote: » Nobody in the studio asked her to back it up. So unless somebody does, what she says is worthy of quoting. Would it embarrass you if they did employ someone? This is the party whose leader was suggesting using anonymous accounts on Twitter after all. They don't appear to take a very ethical approach to online activity.https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/politics/varadkar-suggested-creating-anonymous-accounts-online-to-make-positive-comments-on-news-37275799.html
Higgins5473 wrote: » Sweet Jesus, 500 plus posts in a month? Is it managed by just you or a few others. It must be exhausting. Do they give you days off at Xmas? Depending on leakage info of course.
Jinglejangle69 wrote: » I never said it was a crime. But if you make a claim, at least have something to back it up with. Can we agree on that at least? Or we can all just run around accusing people of all sorts without any evidence. That would end well.
FrancieBrady wrote: » Brid Smith claimed on RTE today that FG have employed somebody to do this full time. Trawl twitter and FB. FG intend to get down and dirty rather than give up power. Fun times ahead.
FrancieBrady wrote: » Why? It isn't a crime she was accusing them of even though you might be embarrassed about it.
Solutionking wrote: » Brid Smith part of the party which wrote a letter to Sinn Fein begging them to talk and try form a government. She has everything to gain from joining up with SF.
Jinglejangle69 wrote: » Bríd Smith would want to back up her claim with evidence.
FrancieBrady wrote: » Agree. But it is gonna get dirty and counterproductive. As you see somebody is already on the thread shooting the messenger Brid Smith. Smith said while still criticising Stanley for what she also believes was a homophobic tweet, so no gain in her saying it. With The ex editor of the Sun onboard the government now, the last ditch cling on of the power swap is gonna be nasty. Redtop politics.
Solutionking wrote: » The same Brid Smith who was talking about what jacket Leo was wearing Not what anyone would call a reliable source of information
Nobotty wrote: » I'd well believe it I'd also be concerned that they are so cocky that they don't mind people knowing this Its not in FG's gift to give up or attain power Thats the peoples gift Enough see it as painted here or enough don't Thats the nature of it On the plus side,this new FG playbook was tried before By David Cameron And we know where he is now Its not at the levers of power The best laid plans/schemes often end up uptripped
Ireland2020 wrote: » More people voted for SF Govt than FF or FG or any other party Facts
Nobotty wrote: » Sorry, could someone remind me again what Stanley believes that we never knew he believed? Also Stanley's tweet on Vradakar as homophobey as it is,was 2 years ago,why didn't journalists and other politicians following him raise an issue then? His digression was to post about his party's well known core beliefs for which his party won special acceptances in the Good Friday agreement? Seriously? This is woke gone mad Its also woke being used as revenge, I'd say FG agents are behind it IMO Its going to get worse
Nobotty wrote: » Also Stanley's tweet on Vradakar as homophobey as it is,was 2 years ago,why didn't journalists and other politicians following him raise an issue then?
Brendan Bendar wrote: » Now.... if I was MLMD this lad would never see the light of day of any position high or low under my leadership. What did she do......nowt. Might explain why Sf a long long way from power. Go figure.
Ireland2020 wrote: » More people voted for SF than any other party