JasonStatham wrote: » It's said that people inherently dislike the people that they're most similar to. Judging by all your posts on here about Stanley, you're quite like him.
Jinglejangle69 wrote: » How's that United Ireland objective working out?Seems the kingdom is more united than ever:)
Jinglejangle69 wrote: » How's that United Ireland objective working out? Seems the kingdom is more united than ever:)
blanch152 wrote: » They achieved peace by stopping killing people, just like the man who stopped beating his wife achieved a peaceful marriage.
Floppybits wrote: » Really scraping the bottom of the barrel with that one. Of course the person waffling about his principals likes it. Shows where his principals really are.
Ireland2020 wrote: » Highest Polling with Red C EVER Best Election is decades Alls going good
walshb wrote: » Their ultimate goal was to remove British control of the North.. They may not have achieved that, but they did achieve peace up North. They did win back the rights and dignities of the oppressed up North. They did make the oppressor take notice and relent and ease back on their pressing of oppression.. They had “wins.” Wins that many people may not fully see, understand or appreciate..But many people do understand and see and appreciate.. There is no place for the IRA now or recently. Their job is done, over. Desperate that any people had to die, but the IRA (humans/people) did what they felt they absolutely had to do at the time under the circumstances.. I would never fault them for that!
blanch152 wrote: » It is pretty much the John Hume/Seamus Mallon take on events so more like SDLP on the brain.
Ireland2020 wrote: » SF on the membrane
blanch152 wrote: » They achieved peace by stopping killing people, just like the man who stopped beating his wife achieved a peaceful marriage. All of the rest was on offer in Sunningdale and was achievable by peaceful means. It was delayed not helped by terrorism as the terrorism gave the Brits and unionists an excuse not to implement change.
Hamsterchops wrote: » Deep man :rolleyes:
Bowie wrote: » I'm sure you do. People lying to use the subjects of racism and homophobia to further an agenda disrespects and belittles genuine critics.
batman75 wrote: » Curious as to what you define as successful. The IRA failed in the ultimate objective which was to remove British governance from the island.
KarlMarks wrote: » I'm a proud Irish Republican. Why would I want to apologise for the actions of the IRA (even though I sided more with the actions of another republican grouping and am a reluctant SF voter)? The British Army are a foreign army on this island and the PIRA carried out a succcesful action that struck right at the heart of the enemy. That is to be celebrated. Its you Free Staters who like to pick and choose which bits of history you celebrate who are the ones having to jump through hoops.
FrancieBrady wrote: » He is calling Leo a Tory as many have.
rdwight wrote: » You think the phrase "yippee for D tory" is a celebration of either Leo's election or a gay rights referendum from two years previously? God love you. Stop digging Francie.
FrancieBrady wrote: » I am not aware of any. I could show you a tweet where a member says Yippee we have rights for gays but what we need now is workers rights. Written by somebody who is in a party that campaigned for those rights as he did himself while other members of the Oireachtas denied d those rights until it was politically advantageous not to oppose them anymore.
FrancieBrady wrote: » I am not aware of any. I could show you a tweet where a member says Yippee we have rights for gays but what we need now is workers rights. Written by somebody who is in a party that campaigned for those rights as he did himself while other members of the Oireachtas denied those rights until it was politically advantageous not to oppose them anymore.
expectationlost wrote: » he deleted his account https://twitter.com/BrianStanleyTD/ and FB
rdwight wrote: » Perhaps you can point out other instances where one member of the Oireachtas went out of their way to reference the sexual life of another member.
FrancieBrady wrote: » Prove what? That you ignore fat shaming of a specific female politician? The 'principled caller outer' should be able to link us to a post of his on the many SF threads where it routinely happens showing him calling it out in a principled way.