walshb wrote: » Yep. Of course. The Shinners magic money tree!
blanch152 wrote: » He is not one of those, is he? Anti-flouride, anti-Chinese chicken, a dog-whistle homophobe and glorifies terrorism. What a nice man.
jh79 wrote: » He was the public face but it was a party effort. Local councils where SF had a majority passed motions to end it.FG were against it too but they didn't use "research" from the dregs of the internet .
Bowie wrote: » Desperate There was politicians of all stripes agin vaccinations, flouride etc. etc. The FG effort to try make out that anyone doesn't vote for them has issues is pretty weird.
jh79 wrote: » I know there are but they were getting scientific advice from an "Angel Reader" ffs. I wouldn't vote Green either for similar reasons. They've supported homeopathy in the past. That's even worse in my book.
FrancieBrady wrote: » What is 'Angel Reader' a reference to?
jh79 wrote: » Girl Against Fluoride.
jh79 wrote: » You don't think people who think the pill pollutes our water and causes homosexuality have issues? That was the company he was keeping.
FrancieBrady wrote: » Wh the f**k is that? Jesus, what is wrong with you and downcow and Brendi etc that you cannot use names?
Bowie wrote: » Odd balls in many parties is all I'm saying. Likening protestors to ISIS, wanting to reintroduce wolves, thinking it was covid number 19 and so on. There's a movement on here to demean the average punter for not voting FG.
Bowie wrote: » Odd balls in many parties is all I'm saying. Likening protestors to ISIS, wanting to reintroduce wolves, thinking it was covid number 19 and so on. There's a movement on here to demean the average punter for not voting FG. It's bizarre in it's own right. Manys a voter floats, probably the majority of them.
For Forks Sake wrote: » He's been decommissioned it would seemhttps://twitter.com/gavreilly/status/1334596162897272834
jh79 wrote: » Apart from COVID 18/19 not a clue what you're talking about. I was posting on the fluoride thread at the time, must be nearly 10 years ago. Long before I ever posted in a SF thread.
FrancieBrady wrote: » I'd do the same myself if there was someone snooping around looking for something to be principled and outraged about.
jh79 wrote: » I'd say it's a bit late now. Should of just left it. All they did was give the news a nice twitter screenshot to show.
walshb wrote: » I really think that ANY party that needs to have a member close down their social media accounts needs to take a long hard look at the caliber of people they are attracting!!
FrancieBrady wrote: » Loads of examples of politicians having to delete tweets walshb. The holier than thou nonsense about this is hilarious. Here's one on a quick google ...loads out there.https://www.msn.com/en-ie/news/generalelection2020/fine-gael-td-advisor-admits-mary-lube-mcdonald-tweet-was-not-right/ar-BBZJGIi?li=BBr5KbJ
FrancieBrady wrote: » How would , 'It was all wrong from the start' be excusing of any of it mark?
Another trip up a time wasting blind alley of attacking a poster.
walshb wrote: » Yes, and like said...ANY party needing to watch/discipline or have any persons associated with them close down their social media accounts due to turn not being trusted....well.. Nothing to do with holier than thou at all Simple standards and decency And its decadence is society’s biggest ill.
markodaly wrote: » I thought it would be obvious. Your catch phrase of "It was all wrong" is always followed by other posts blaming partition. "It was all wrong ... but" Anytime the murderous actions of SF/IRA are brought up, we get the "But"... remark usually followed about how its really the fault of partition or da Brits or something else... Attacking? I am merely quoting back to you what you said. That is all.
FrancieBrady wrote: » He suspended his account because very obviously anther party smells blood and is desperate for something to show. First attack didn't work, the mob is looking for more.
Bishop of hope wrote: » If there's nothing to see why shut it down? Looks like he's been censored to me.